Study to Assess Effectiveness of Giving Combination of Standard Chemotherapy Drugs Versus Combination of Standard Chemotherapy and New Drug Ixabepilone When Given Before Surgical Removal of Early Stage Breast Cancer
A Randomized Phase II Biomarker Neoadjuvant Study of Sequential AC Followed by Ixabepilone Compared to Sequential AC Followed by Paclitaxel in Women With Early Stage Breast Cancer
2 other identifiers
interventional
384
15 countries
49
Brief Summary
The study will evaluate the effectiveness of ixabepilone when given after doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide (AC) compared to standard treatment of paclitaxel given after doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide in patients with early stage breast cancer. In addition the study will verify predefined biomarkers as well as discover new biomarkers that could identify patients who are more likely to respond to ixabepilone than standard paclitaxel based therapy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2 breast-cancer
Started Oct 2007
Shorter than P25 for phase_2 breast-cancer
49 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 2, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 3, 2007
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 4, 2011
CompletedFebruary 24, 2016
January 1, 2016
2.2 years
April 2, 2007
March 4, 2011
January 25, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Percentage of Participants Achieving Pathologic Complete Response (pCR)
The pCR was defined as no histologic evidence of residual invasive adenocarcinoma in the breast and axillary lymph nodes, with or without the presence of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in the breast.
at surgery (performed 4-6 weeks after the last dose of 12 weeks of therapy)
Percentage of Participants Achieving Pathologic Complete Response (pCR) in Biomarker-Defined Populations
Beta III tubulin positivity determined by cross-validation method. Optimal cutoff: ≥46% tumor cells staining at 2 plus or 3 plus intensity (corresponding Beta III tubulin positivity=39.4%). Pre-specified cutoff of Beta III tubulin positivity: ≥50% 2plus or 3plus cells (corresponding prevalence=38.5%). Optimal cutoffs for TACC3 and CAPG positivity determined by cross-validation method: 6.889 and 6.844 \[log2 normalized intensity units\], respectively (corresponding to prevalence rates of 43.3% and 44.3%).
pCR evaluated at time of surgery (4-6 weeks after the last dose of therapy); mandatory tumor tissue biopsy obtained prior to treatment.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Pathologic Complete Response (pCR) in 20- and 26-Gene Model Subgroups
For each of the 2 biomarker sets (20-gene or 26-gene), a multi-gene model was built using penalized logistic regression on all pharmacogenomic evaluable subjects for each treatment arm separately. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) plots for separate arm using 5 fold cross validation were generated. ROC for separate arms using cross over were also added. Further analysis on the multiple gene models (as mentioned in the SAP) was planned only based on the initial findings from the 2 ROC plots. For 20- and 26-gene models, ROC curves generated for each study arm did not indicate that these multi-gene models differentially predicted for pCR between the treatment arms, so further analyses to estimate the optimal cut-off and the pCR rates were not conducted.
pCR evaluated at time of surgery (4-6 weeks after the last dose of therapy); mandatory tumor tissue biopsy obtained prior to treatment.
Secondary Outcomes (20)
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Objective Response
after the last dose of either ixabepilone or paclitaxel (at 12 weeks) but before surgery (4-6 weeks after the last dose of 12 weeks of therapy)
Percentage of Participants Requiring Breast Conservation Surgery
at surgery (performed 4-6 weeks after the last dose of 12 weeks of therapy)
Percentage of Participants Achieving Combined pCR and Minimal Residual Cancer Burden (RCB) 1
at surgery (performed 4-6 weeks after the last dose of 12 weeks of therapy)
Randomized Participants With Non-missing pCR & Biomarker Expression (GENE [Probe Set]), to Explore Whether Gene Expression Patterns for GTSE1, Isoforms of β-tubulin, Kallikreins 5, 6, 10 Are Differentially Predictive of pCR
pCR evaluated at time of surgery (performed 4-6 weeks after the last dose of 12 weeks of therapy); mandatory tumor tissue biopsy obtained prior to treatment.
Randomized Participants With Non-missing pCR & Biomarker Expression (GENE [Probe Set]) to Explore Whether Gene Expression Patterns for GTSE1, Isoforms of β-tubulin, Kallikreins 5, 6, 10 Are Differentially Predictive of pCR/RCB1
pCR evaluated at time of surgery (4-6 weeks after the last dose of therapy); mandatory tumor tissue biopsy obtained prior to treatment.
- +15 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
A
EXPERIMENTALB
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Intravenous Solution, intravenous (IV), 40mg/m², Day 1 every 21 days, 12 Weeks
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Histologically confirmed primary invasive adenocarcinoma of the breast , T2-3, N0-3, M0, with tumor size of ≥ 2 cm
- All patients with early stage breast adenocarcinoma may enroll irrespective of receptor status
- No prior treatment for breast cancer excluding therapy for DCIS
- Karnofsky performance status of 80 - 100
- left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 50% by echocardiogram or multiple gated acquisition (MUGA)
- Adequate hematologic, hepatic and renal function
You may not qualify if:
- women of child-bearing potential (WOCBP) unwilling or unable to use an acceptable method to avoid pregnancy during and up to 8 weeks after the last dose of the investigational drug
- Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding
- Inflammatory or metastatic breast cancer
- Unfit for breast and/or axillary surgery
- Evidence of baseline sensory or motor neuropathy
- Significant history of cardiovascular disease, serious intercurrent illness or infections including known human immu immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection
- History of prior anthracycline therapy Allergies to any study medication or Cremophor® EL
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (49)
Comprehensive Cancer Center
Palm Springs, California, 92262, United States
Northwest Oncology & Hematology Associates
Coral Spring, Florida, 33065, United States
Florida Cancer Research Institute
Davie, Florida, 33328, United States
Medical Specialists Of Palm Beaches
Lake Worth, Florida, 33467, United States
Moffitt Cancer Center
Tampa, Florida, 33612, United States
University Medical Center, Inc
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202, United States
University Of New Mexico Cancer Center
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87131, United States
Albert Einstein Cancer Center
The Bronx, New York, 10461, United States
Virginia Mason Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, 98101, United States
Providence Cancer Center
Spokane, Washington, 99204, United States
Local Institution
Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, 1180AAX, Argentina
Local Institution
Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, 1650, Argentina
Local Institution
Capital Federal, Buenos Aires, 1417, Argentina
Local Institution
Capital Federal, Buenos Aires, 1425, Argentina
Local Institution
Salzburg, 5020, Austria
Local Institution
Vienna, 1090, Austria
Local Institution
Bordeaux, 33000, France
Local Institution
Saint-Herblain, 44805, France
Local Institution
Düsseldorf, 40235, Germany
Local Institution
Erlangen, 91054, Germany
Local Institution
Jena, 07743, Germany
Local Institution
Bangalore, Karnataka, 560029, India
Local Institution
Trivandrum, Kerala, 695011, India
Local Institution
Pune, Maharashtra, 411001, India
Local Institution
New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, 110 095, India
Local Institution
Bhopal, 462001, India
Local Institution
Hyderabad, 500 004, India
Local Institution
Mumbai, 400012, India
Local Institution
Vellore, 632004, India
Local Institution
Bologna, 40138, Italy
Local Institution
Lima, Lima Province, 34, Peru
Local Institution
Lima, Lima Province, LIMA 11, Peru
Local Institution
Callao, Provincia Constitucional del Callao, 2, Peru
Local Institution
Cebu City, 6000, Philippines
Local Institution
Davao City, 8000, Philippines
Local Institution
Quezon City, 1114, Philippines
Local Institution
Kazan', 420029, Russia
Local Institution
Moscow, 129128, Russia
Local Institution
Saint Petersburg, 197022, Russia
Local Institution
Singapore, 308433, Singapore
Local Institution
Seoul, 135-710, South Korea
Local Institution
Seoul, 135-720, South Korea
Local Institution
Barcelona, 08035, Spain
Local Institution
Jaén, 23007, Spain
Local Institution
Lleida, 25198, Spain
Local Institution
Taipei, 100, Taiwan
Local Institution
Taipei, 11217, Taiwan
Local Institution
Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG5 1PB, United Kingdom
Local Institution
Coventry, Warwickshire, CV22DX, United Kingdom
Related Publications (1)
Abdel-Fatah TMA, Agarwal D, Liu DX, Russell R, Rueda OM, Liu K, Xu B, Moseley PM, Green AR, Pockley AG, Rees RC, Caldas C, Ellis IO, Ball GR, Chan SYT. SPAG5 as a prognostic biomarker and chemotherapy sensitivity predictor in breast cancer: a retrospective, integrated genomic, transcriptomic, and protein analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jul;17(7):1004-1018. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)00174-1. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
PMID: 27312051DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- BMS Study Director
- Organization
- Bristol-Myers Squibb
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 2, 2007
First Posted
April 3, 2007
Study Start
October 1, 2007
Primary Completion
December 1, 2009
Study Completion
December 1, 2009
Last Updated
February 24, 2016
Results First Posted
April 4, 2011
Record last verified: 2016-01