NCT00312377

Brief Summary

This large phase III clinical study is studying the effect of vandetanib (ZACTIMA) in treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Vandetanib is a new type of agent that targets the blood supply to a cancer tumour (through it's anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) properties) and the tumour cells themselves (through it's anti-endothelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) actions). This study will look at the effects of vandetanib in lung cancer patients who have had their cancer re-appear after treatment with standard chemotherapy. This clinical study will test if the vandetanib anti-VEGF and anti-EGFR characteristics can deliver longer improved progression free survival and improved overall survival than docetaxel (Taxotere) alone. All patients participating this clinical study will receive treatment with docetaxel, a commonly used treatment for recurrent non-small cell lung cancer. In addition, some patients will also receive vandetanib (ZACTIMA), an anti-EGFR / anti-VEGF agent. Recent clinical research shows that vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) inhibition, when used with standard chemotherapy, can lead to increased survival in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Other research shows that epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors, like erlotinib (Tarceva) can also increase overall non-small cell lung cancer survival by killing tumour cells and stopping them from dividing.

Trial Health

98
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Strong global presence with extensive site network
Enrollment
1,690

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_3 nonsmall-cell-lung-cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2006

Longer than P75 for phase_3 nonsmall-cell-lung-cancer

Geographic Reach
25 countries

156 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 6, 2006

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 10, 2006

Completed
21 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2006

Completed
2.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2008

Completed
2.8 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 24, 2011

Completed
2.8 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

September 30, 2016

Status Verified

August 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

2.3 years

First QC Date

April 6, 2006

Results QC Date

April 27, 2011

Last Update Submit

August 24, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

Non-small cell lung cancerNSCLC

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in the Overall Population

    Median time (in weeks) from randomisation until objective disease progression or death (by any cause in the absence of objective progression) provided death is within 3 months from the last evaluable RECIST assessment. Progression was derived according to RECIST 1.0 and is defined as an increase of at least 20% in the total tumour size of measurable lesions over the nadir measurement, unequivocal progression in the non-target lesions or the appearance of one or more new lesions.

    RECIST tumour assessments carried out every 6 weeks from randomisation until the date of first documented objective disease progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first assessed up to 24 months

  • Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in the Female Population

    Median time (in weeks) from randomisation until objective disease progression or death (by any cause in the absence of objective progression) provided death is within 3 months from the last evaluable RECIST assessment. Progression was derived according to RECIST 1.0 and is defined as an increase of at least 20% in the total tumour size of measurable lesions over the nadir measurement, unequivocal progression in the non-target lesions or the appearance of one or more new lesions.

    RECIST tumour assessments carried out every 6 weeks from randomisation until the date of first documented objective disease progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first assessed up to 24 months

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Overall Survival (OS) in the Overall Population

    Time to death in months

  • Overall Survival (OS) in the Female Population

    Time to death in months

  • Objective Response Rate (ORR)

    Each patient was assessed for objective response from the sequence of RECIST scan data up to data cut off. RECIST tumour assessments carried out every 6 weeks from randomisation until objective progression

  • Disease Control Rate (DCR)

    RECIST tumour assessments carried out every 6 weeks from randomisation until objective progression

  • Duration of Response (DoR)

    RECIST tumour assessments carried out every 6 weeks from randomisation until objective progression

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

1

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Docetaxel monotherapy

Drug: Docetaxel

2

EXPERIMENTAL

Vandetanib + Docetaxel

Drug: DocetaxelDrug: Vandetanib

Interventions

infusion

Also known as: TAXOTERE™
12

oral

Also known as: ZACTIMA™, ZD6474
2

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Lung cancer patients who answer true to the following statements are eligible to join this clinical study.
  • I have a confirmed diagnosis of locally advanced or metastatic non small cell lung cancer (Stage IIIb - IV)
  • I have had 1st line anti-cancer therapy. Previous treatment with Avastin (bevacizumab) in first line NSCLC is allowed.

You may not qualify if:

  • Lung cancer patients who answer true to the following are NOT eligible to join this clinical study.
  • I do not have non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
  • I have received treatment with docetaxel (Taxotere). Prior treatment with paclitaxel is acceptable.
  • I have received 2nd line anti-cancer therapy (For example, patients with previous 2nd line non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment with Tarceva (erlotinib, OSI-744), Alimta (pemetrexed) are not eligible)
  • I have been treated with VEGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (sunitinib, sorafenib, other VEGF TKIs). Previous treatment with Avastin (bevacizumab) in 1st line non small cell lung cancer is permitted.
  • I have a history of uncontrolled irregular heartbeat

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (156)

Research Site

Fullerton, California, United States

Location

Research Site

Los Angeles, California, United States

Location

Research Site

Northridge, California, United States

Location

Research Site

Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States

Location

Research Site

Norwalk, Connecticut, United States

Location

Research Site

Ocala, Florida, United States

Location

Research Site

Marietta, Georgia, United States

Location

Research Site

Joliet, Illinois, United States

Location

Research Site

Park Ridge, Illinois, United States

Location

Research Site

Hutchinson, Kansas, United States

Location

Research Site

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Location

Research Site

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Location

Research Site

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Location

Research Site

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Location

Research Site

Henderson, Nevada, United States

Location

Research Site

Albany, New York, United States

Location

Research Site

Armonk, New York, United States

Location

Research Site

New York, New York, United States

Location

Research Site

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Location

Research Site

Hickory, North Carolina, United States

Location

Research Site

Portland, Oregon, United States

Location

Research Site

Austin, Texas, United States

Location

Research Site

Houston, Texas, United States

Location

Research Site

Ogden, Utah, United States

Location

Research Site

Alexandria, Virginia, United States

Location

Research Site

Salem, Virginia, United States

Location

Research Site

Vancouver, Washington, United States

Location

Research Site

Bahía Blanca, Argentina

Location

Research Site

Capital Federal, Argentina

Location

Research Site

Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina

Location

Research Site

Mendoza, Argentina

Location

Research Site

Rosario, Argentina

Location

Research Site

Graz, Austria

Location

Research Site

Grimmenstein, Austria

Location

Research Site

Innsbruck, Austria

Location

Research Site

Linz, Austria

Location

Research Site

Vienna, Austria

Location

Research Site

Wels, Austria

Location

Research Site

Brussels (Jette), Belgium

Location

Research Site

Brussels (Woluwé-St-Lambert), Belgium

Location

Research Site

Edegem, Belgium

Location

Research Site

Genk, Belgium

Location

Research Site

Liège, Belgium

Location

Research Site

Fortaleza, Brazil

Location

Research Site

Goiânia, Brazil

Location

Research Site

Porto Alegre, Brazil

Location

Research Site

Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Location

Research Site

São Paulo, Brazil

Location

Research Site

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Location

Research Site

Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada

Location

Research Site

Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Location

Research Site

Kitchener, Ontario, Canada

Location

Research Site

London, Ontario, Canada

Location

Research Site

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Location

Research Site

Laval, Quebec, Canada

Location

Research Site

Québec, Quebec, Canada

Location

Research Site

Beijing, China

Location

Research Site

Chongqing, China

Location

Research Site

Guangzhou, China

Location

Research Site

Nanjing, China

Location

Research Site

Shanghai, China

Location

Research Site

Wuhan, China

Location

Research Site

Herlev, Denmark

Location

Research Site

København Ø, Denmark

Location

Research Site

Odense, Denmark

Location

Research Site

Roskilde, Denmark

Location

Research Site

Vejle, Denmark

Location

Research Site

Bordeaux, France

Location

Research Site

Boulogne-Billancourt, France

Location

Research Site

Caen, France

Location

Research Site

Dijon, France

Location

Research Site

Nancy, France

Location

Research Site

Paris, France

Location

Research Site

Pierre-Bénite, France

Location

Research Site

Saint-Herblain, France

Location

Research Site

Bad Berka, Germany

Location

Research Site

Berlin, Germany

Location

Research Site

Cologne, Germany

Location

Research Site

Essen, Germany

Location

Research Site

Großhansdorf, Germany

Location

Research Site

Halle, Germany

Location

Research Site

Hamburg, Germany

Location

Research Site

Heidelberg, Germany

Location

Research Site

Oldenburg, Germany

Location

Research Site

Ulm, Germany

Location

Research Site

Wiesbaden, Germany

Location

Research Site

Athens, Greece

Location

Research Site

Heraklion, Greece

Location

Research Site

Ahmedabad, India

Location

Research Site

Chennai, India

Location

Research Site

Hyderabad, India

Location

Research Site

Kolkata, India

Location

Research Site

New Delhi, India

Location

Research Site

Pune, India

Location

Research Site

Vellore, India

Location

Research Site

Jakarta Timur, Indonesia

Location

Research Site

Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Location

Research Site

Ancona, Italy

Location

Research Site

Avellino, Italy

Location

Research Site

Bologna, Italy

Location

Research Site

Genova, Italy

Location

Research Site

Mantova, Italy

Location

Research Site

Napoli, Italy

Location

Research Site

Orbassano, Italy

Location

Research Site

Parma, Italy

Location

Research Site

Perugia, Italy

Location

Research Site

Pisa, Italy

Location

Research Site

Reggio Emilia, Italy

Location

Research Site

Akashi-shi, Japan

Location

Research Site

Fukuoka, Japan

Location

Research Site

Isehara-shi, Japan

Location

Research Site

Kobe, Japan

Location

Research Site

Kōtoku, Japan

Location

Research Site

Kumamoto, Japan

Location

Research Site

Matsuyama, Japan

Location

Research Site

Nagoya, Japan

Location

Research Site

Okayama, Japan

Location

Research Site

Okazaki-shi, Japan

Location

Research Site

Osaka, Japan

Location

Research Site

Osakasayama-shi, Japan

Location

Research Site

Sakaishi, Japan

Location

Research Site

Sapporo, Japan

Location

Research Site

Shinjuku-ku, Japan

Location

Research Site

Sunto-gun, Japan

Location

Research Site

Toyonaka, Japan

Location

Research Site

Ube-shi, Japan

Location

Research Site

Utsunomiya, Japan

Location

Research Site

Yokohama, Japan

Location

Research Site

George Town, Malaysia

Location

Research Site

Kampung Baharu Nilai, Malaysia

Location

Research Site

Kubang Kerian, Malaysia

Location

Research Site

Durango, Mexico

Location

Research Site

Morelia, Mexico

Location

Research Site

Toluca, Mexico

Location

Research Site

's-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands

Location

Research Site

Amsterdam, Netherlands

Location

Research Site

Groningen, Netherlands

Location

Research Site

Maastricht, Netherlands

Location

Research Site

Coimbra, Portugal

Location

Research Site

Funchal, Portugal

Location

Research Site

Lisbon, Portugal

Location

Research Site

Porto, Portugal

Location

Research Site

Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal

Location

Research Site

Singapore, Singapore

Location

Research Site

Seoul, South Korea

Location

Research Site

A Coruña, Spain

Location

Research Site

Alicante, Spain

Location

Research Site

Madrid, Spain

Location

Research Site

Málaga, Spain

Location

Research Site

Zaragoza, Spain

Location

Research Site

Chiang Mai, Thailand

Location

Research Site

Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Research Site

Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Research Site

Izmir, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Research Site

Hanoi, Vietnam

Location

Research Site

Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Lombard A, Mistry H, Aarons L, Ogungbenro K. Dose individualisation in oncology using chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: Example of docetaxel in non-small cell lung cancer patients. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Apr;87(4):2053-2063. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14614. Epub 2020 Dec 19.

  • Platt A, Morten J, Ji Q, Elvin P, Womack C, Su X, Donald E, Gray N, Read J, Bigley G, Blockley L, Cresswell C, Dale A, Davies A, Zhang T, Fan S, Fu H, Gladwin A, Harrod G, Stevens J, Williams V, Ye Q, Zheng L, de Boer R, Herbst RS, Lee JS, Vasselli J. A retrospective analysis of RET translocation, gene copy number gain and expression in NSCLC patients treated with vandetanib in four randomized Phase III studies. BMC Cancer. 2015 Mar 23;15:171. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1146-8.

  • Heymach JV, Lockwood SJ, Herbst RS, Johnson BE, Ryan AJ. EGFR biomarkers predict benefit from vandetanib in combination with docetaxel in a randomized phase III study of second-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol. 2014 Oct;25(10):1941-1948. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu269. Epub 2014 Jul 23.

  • Herbst RS, Sun Y, Eberhardt WE, Germonpre P, Saijo N, Zhou C, Wang J, Li L, Kabbinavar F, Ichinose Y, Qin S, Zhang L, Biesma B, Heymach JV, Langmuir P, Kennedy SJ, Tada H, Johnson BE. Vandetanib plus docetaxel versus docetaxel as second-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (ZODIAC): a double-blind, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010 Jul;11(7):619-26. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70132-7.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung Neoplasms

Interventions

Docetaxelvandetanib

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Carcinoma, BronchogenicBronchial NeoplasmsRespiratory Tract NeoplasmsThoracic NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsLung DiseasesRespiratory Tract Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

TaxoidsCyclodecanesCycloparaffinsHydrocarbons, AlicyclicHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbonsOrganic ChemicalsDiterpenesTerpenes

Results Point of Contact

Title
Trial Transparency Team
Organization
Sanofi

Study Officials

  • Contact-US@sanofi.com

    Sanofi

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 6, 2006

First Posted

April 10, 2006

Study Start

May 1, 2006

Primary Completion

August 1, 2008

Study Completion

March 1, 2014

Last Updated

September 30, 2016

Results First Posted

May 24, 2011

Record last verified: 2016-08

Locations