Combination Chemotherapy, Bone Marrow Transplant, and Post Transplant Cyclophosphamide for Hematologic Cancer
HLA Matched Related and Unrelated Bone Marrow Transplantation With Busulfan/Cyclophosphamide and Post Transplantation Cyclophosphamide for Hematological Malignancies
4 other identifiers
interventional
142
1 country
1
Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Giving chemotherapy before a donor bone marrow transplant helps stop the growth of cancer and abnormal cells and helps stop the patient's immune system from rejecting the donor's stem cells. When the healthy stem cells from a donor are infused into the patient they may help the patient's bone marrow make stem cells, red blood cells, white blood cells, and platelets. Sometimes the transplanted cells from a donor can make an immune response against the body's normal cells. Giving cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil, or tacrolimus after transplant may stop this from happening. PURPOSE: This clinical trial is studying how well giving combination chemotherapy together with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil works in treating patients who are undergoing a donor bone marrow transplant for hematologic cancer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Jun 2004
Longer than P75 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2004
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 22, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 24, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2010
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 31, 2018
CompletedAugust 31, 2018
August 1, 2018
5.7 years
August 22, 2005
July 31, 2018
August 29, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of Participants Who Develop Acute Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD)
Percentage of participants who developed grades II-IV and grades III-IV acute GVHD. Acute GVHD is defined by the Przepiorka criteria, which stages the degree of organ involvement in the skin, liver, and gastrointestinal (GI) tract, based on severity, with Stage 1+ being least severe and stage 4+ being the most severe. Grading of acute GVHD is as follows: Grade I (skin involvement stages 1+ to 2+, with no liver or GI involvement), Grade II (skin involvement stages 1+ to 3+, liver 1+, GI tract 1+), Grade III (skin involvement stages 2+ to 3+, liver 1+, GI tract 2+ to 4+), Grade IV (skin involvement stages 4+, Liver 4+).
Day 100
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Days to Engraftment
Up to one year
Chimerism
Day 30, Day 60
Non-relapse Mortality
Day 100, 2 years
Relapse
2 years
Study Arms (1)
Bone marrow transplant
EXPERIMENTALMyeloablative bone marrow transplant with a busulfan (Bu), cyclophosphamide (Cy), preparative regimen and post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) as GVHD prophylaxis
Interventions
Days -7 to -4: 4 mg/kg PO daily OR 3.2 mg/kg IV daily OR 160 mg/m\^2 daily (for pediatric recipients)
Days -3, -2, +3, +4: 50 mg/kg IV daily
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
Baltimore, Maryland, 21231-2410, United States
Related Publications (1)
Luznik L, Bolanos-Meade J, Zahurak M, Chen AR, Smith BD, Brodsky R, Huff CA, Borrello I, Matsui W, Powell JD, Kasamon Y, Goodman SN, Hess A, Levitsky HI, Ambinder RF, Jones RJ, Fuchs EJ. High-dose cyclophosphamide as single-agent, short-course prophylaxis of graft-versus-host disease. Blood. 2010 Apr 22;115(16):3224-30. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-11-251595. Epub 2010 Feb 2.
PMID: 20124511RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Leo Luznik, MD
- Organization
- Johns Hopkins University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Leo Luznik, MD
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 22, 2005
First Posted
August 24, 2005
Study Start
June 1, 2004
Primary Completion
February 1, 2010
Study Completion
February 1, 2010
Last Updated
August 31, 2018
Results First Posted
August 31, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share