Radiation Therapy and Either Capecitabine or Fluorouracil With or Without Oxaliplatin Before Surgery in Treating Patients With Resectable Rectal Cancer
A Clinical Trial Comparing Preoperative Radiation Therapy And Capecitabine With or Without Oxaliplatin With Preoperative Radiation Therapy And Continuous Intravenous Infusion Of 5-Fluorouracil With or Without Oxaliplatin In The Treatment Of Patients With Operable Carcinoma Of The Rectum
3 other identifiers
interventional
1,608
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as capecitabine, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin work in different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage tumor cells. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying radiation therapy and either capecitabine or fluorouracil with or without oxaliplatin and comparing them to see how well they work when given before surgery in treating patients with resectable rectal cancer. It is not yet known whether radiation therapy and either capecitabine or fluorouracil is more effective with or without oxaliplatin in treating rectal cancer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3 colorectal-cancer
Started Jul 2004
Longer than P75 for phase_3 colorectal-cancer
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 7, 2003
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 9, 2003
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2004
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2016
CompletedMarch 23, 2016
March 1, 2016
9.1 years
April 7, 2003
March 22, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Loco-regional disease control as assessed by evidence of tumor at 3 years
Time from randomization to first local recurrence up to 3 years
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Clinical complete response as assessed by digital rectal exam and sigmoidoscopy or proctoscopy at time of definitive analysis
Prior to surgery approximately 6 weeks
Pathologic complete response as assessed by gross and microscopic exam of surgical specimens at time of definitive analysis
At the time of surgery approximately 6 weeks
Sphincter-saving surgery at time of definitive analysis
At the time of surgery approximately 6 weeks
Survival as measured by deaths from any cause at time of definitive analysis
From time of randomization through 5 years
Disease-free survival as assessed by recurrence, second primary cancer, or death from any cause at time of definitive analysis
From time of randomization through 5 years
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
Arm 1: 5-FU + RT
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients receive fluorouracil IV continuously and undergo radiation therapy (RT) once daily 5 days a week for 5-6 weeks.
Arm 2: 5-FU + RT + Oxaliplatin
EXPERIMENTALPatients receive fluorouracil and undergo RT as in arm 1. Patients also receive oxaliplatin IV over 1 hour once weekly for 5 weeks.
Arm 3: Capecitabine + RT
EXPERIMENTALPatients receive oral capecitabine twice daily and undergo RT once daily 5 days a week for 5-6 weeks.
Arm 4: Capecitabine + RT + Oxaliplatin
EXPERIMENTALPatients receive capecitabine and undergo RT as in arm 3. Patients also receive oxaliplatin as in arm 2.
Interventions
825 mg/m2 oral daily 5 days a week on days of planned RT
225 mg/m2 IV daily continuous infusion
50 mg/m2 IV 5 days a week on days of planned RT
Given 5 days a week for 5-6 weeks
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients must consent to participate in the study and must have signed and dated an IRB-approved consent form conforming to federal and institutional guidelines.
- Patients must be \> 18 years of age.
- Patients must have a life expectancy of 5 years, excluding their diagnosis of cancer (as determined by the investigator), and must have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) (Zubrod) performance status of 0 or 1.
- Patients must have a diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the rectum obtained by a biopsy technique which leaves the major portion of the tumor intact.
- The interval between the initial diagnosis of rectal adenocarcinoma and randomization must be no more than 42 days.
- Prior to randomization, the investigator must specify the intent for sphincter saving or non-sphincter saving surgery.
- The tumor must be either palpable by digital rectal exam or be accessible via a proctoscope or sigmoidoscope.
- Distal border of the tumor must be located \< 12 cm from the anal verge.
- The tumor must be considered by the surgeon to be amenable to curative resection. (Note that curative resection can include pelvic exenteration.)
- The tumor must be clinically Stage II (T3-4 N0 with N0 being defined as all imaged lymph nodes are \< 1.0 cm) or Stage III (T1-4 N1-2 with the definition of a clinically positive node being any node \> 1.0 cm). Stage of the primary tumor may be determined by ultrasound or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Computed Tomography (CT) scan is acceptable provided there is evidence of T4 and/or N1-2 disease.
- At the time of randomization, all patients must have had the following within the previous 42 days: history and physical examination; if technically feasible, a complete colonoscopic examination; if not feasible, a proctoscopic or sigmoidoscopic exam; clinical staging of the tumor; CT or MRI of the abdomen and pelvis (combined PET/CT may be substituted), and a chest x-ray (PA and lateral) or CT scan of the chest to exclude patients with metastatic disease.
- At the time of randomization: Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) must be \> 1,200/mm3; Platelet count must be \> 100,000/mm3; There must be evidence of adequate hepatic function as follows: total bilirubin must be \< 1.5 x the upper limit of normal (ULN) for the lab; and alkaline phosphatase must be \< 2.5 x Upper Limit of Normal (ULN) for the lab; and the Aspartate Amino Transferase (AST) must be \< 2.5 x ULN for the lab; and If AST is \> ULN, serologic testing for Hepatitis B and C must be performed and results must be negative; Calculated creatinine clearance must be \> 50 mL/min.
- Patients with prior malignancies, including invasive colon cancer, are eligible if they have been disease-free for \> 5 years and are deemed by their physician to be at low risk for recurrence. Patients with squamous or basal cell carcinoma of the skin, melanoma in situ, carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or carcinoma in situ of the colon or rectum that have been effectively treated are eligible, even if these conditions were diagnosed within 5 years prior to randomization.
You may not qualify if:
- Findings of metastatic disease.
- On imaging, clear indication of involvement of the pelvic side wall(s).
- Rectal cancers other than adenocarcinoma, i.e., sarcoma, lymphoma, carcinoid, squamous cell carcinoma, cloacogenic carcinoma, etc.
- History of invasive rectal malignancy, regardless of disease-free interval.
- Pregnancy or lactation at the time of proposed randomization. Eligible patients of reproductive potential (both sexes) must agree to use adequate contraceptive methods.
- Any therapy for this cancer prior to randomization.
- Synchronous colon cancer.
- History of viral hepatitis or other chronic liver disease.
- Nonmalignant systemic disease (cardiovascular, renal, hepatic, etc.) that would preclude the patient from receiving any chemotherapy treatment option or would prevent required follow-up. Specifically excluded are patients with active ischemic heart disease (class III\* or class IV\*\* myocardial disease as described by the New York Heart Association), a recent history (within 6 months) of myocardial infarction, or symptomatic arrhythmia at the time of randomization. \*Class III: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. Such patients are comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary physical activity that causes fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, or anginal pain. \*\*Class IV: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in inability to perform any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of cardiac insufficiency or anginal syndrome may be present even at rest.
- Patients who, in the opinion of the investigator, have uncontrolled hypertension.
- Active inflammatory bowel disease (i.e., patients requiring current medical interventions or who are symptomatic).
- Prior pelvic radiation therapy for any reason.
- Known hypersensitivity to 5-fluorouracil, capecitabine, or oxaliplatin.
- Clinically significant peripheral neuropathy at the time of randomization (defined in the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 \[CTCAE v3.0\] as grade 2 or greater neurosensory or neuromotor toxicity).
- Existing uncontrolled coagulopathy.
- +3 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- NSABP Foundation Inclead
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)collaborator
- Cancer and Leukemia Group Bcollaborator
Related Publications (6)
Ganz PA, Lopa SH, Yothers G, et al.: Comparative effectiveness of sphincter-sparing surgery (SSS) versus abdomino-perineal resection (APR) in rectal cancer: patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from NSABP R-04. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 30 (Suppl 15): A-3545, 2012.
RESULTRoh MS, Yothers GA, O'Connell MJ, et al.: The impact of capecitabine and oxaliplatin in the preoperative multimodality treatment in patients with carcinoma of the rectum: NSABP R-04. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 29 (Suppl 15): A-3503, 2011.
RESULTO'Connell MJ, Colangelo LH, Beart RW, Petrelli NJ, Allegra CJ, Sharif S, Pitot HC, Shields AF, Landry JC, Ryan DP, Parda DS, Mohiuddin M, Arora A, Evans LS, Bahary N, Soori GS, Eakle J, Robertson JM, Moore DF Jr, Mullane MR, Marchello BT, Ward PJ, Wozniak TF, Roh MS, Yothers G, Wolmark N. Capecitabine and oxaliplatin in the preoperative multimodality treatment of rectal cancer: surgical end points from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project trial R-04. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Jun 20;32(18):1927-34. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.53.7753. Epub 2014 May 5.
PMID: 24799484RESULTRussell MM, Ganz PA, Lopa S, Yothers G, Ko CY, Arora A, Atkins JN, Bahary N, Soori GS, Robertson JM, Eakle J, Marchello BT, Wozniak TF, Beart RW Jr, Wolmark N. Comparative effectiveness of sphincter-sparing surgery versus abdominoperineal resection in rectal cancer: patient-reported outcomes in National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project randomized trial R-04. Ann Surg. 2015 Jan;261(1):144-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000594.
PMID: 24670844RESULTPeipert JD, Roydhouse J, Tighiouart M, Henry NL, Kim S, Hays RD, Rogatko A, Yothers G, Ganz PA. Overall side effect assessment of oxaliplatin toxicity in rectal cancer patients in NRG oncology/NSABP R04. Qual Life Res. 2024 Nov;33(11):3069-3079. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03746-5. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
PMID: 39080091DERIVEDGanz PA, Hays RD, Spritzer KL, Rogatko A, Ko CY, Colangelo LH, Arora A, Hopkins JO, Evans TL, Yothers G. Health-related quality of life outcomes after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer in NRG Oncology/NSABP R-04. Cancer. 2022 Sep 1;128(17):3233-3242. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34341. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
PMID: 35749631DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Norman Wolmark, MD
NSABP Foundation Inc
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- NETWORK
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 7, 2003
First Posted
April 9, 2003
Study Start
July 1, 2004
Primary Completion
August 1, 2013
Study Completion
May 1, 2016
Last Updated
March 23, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-03