Paclitaxel With or Without Carboplatin in Treating Women With Metastatic Breast Cancer
A Randomized, Phase II Trial of Weekly Taxol (Paclitaxel) Versus Weekly Taxol Plus Paraplatin (Carboplatin) as First-Line Chemotherapy in Patients Age 65 Years or Older With Metastatic Breast Cancer
3 other identifiers
interventional
N/A
1 country
25
Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. It is not yet known if paclitaxel is more effective with or without carboplatin in treating stage IV breast cancer. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of paclitaxel with or without carboplatin in treating women who have stage IV breast cancer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
25 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2001
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 11, 2001
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 5, 2003
CompletedJuly 24, 2008
September 1, 2006
October 11, 2001
July 23, 2008
Conditions
Keywords
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Theradexlead
Study Sites (25)
Highlands Oncology Group
Springdale, Arkansas, 72764, United States
Monterey Bay Oncology
Monterey, California, 93940, United States
Wilshire Oncology Medical Group, Inc.
Pomona, California, 91767-3021, United States
University of California Davis Cancer Center
Sacramento, California, 95817, United States
New Britain General Hospital
New Britain, Connecticut, 06050, United States
Center for Hematology and Oncology
Boca Raton, Florida, 33486, United States
Cancer Research Network, Inc.
Hollywood, Florida, 33020, United States
Mayo Clinic
Jacksonville, Florida, 32224, United States
MacNeal Cancer Center
Berwyn, Illinois, 60402, United States
Oncology Specialists, SC
Park Ridge, Illinois, 60068, United States
Maine Center for Cancer Medicine and Blood Disorders
Scarborough, Maine, 04074, United States
Maryland Hematology/Oncology Associates
Baltimore, Maryland, 21236, United States
St. John's Mercy Medical Center
St Louis, Missouri, 63141, United States
St. Barnabas Medical Center
Livingston, New Jersey, 07039, United States
Finger Lakes Community Cancer Center
Clifton Springs, New York, 14432, United States
Clinical Hematology & Oncology Service, Inc.
Akron, Ohio, 44302, United States
Scranton Hematology-Oncology
Scranton, Pennsylvania, 18510, United States
East Tennessee Oncology/Hematology, P.C.
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37920, United States
West Clinic
Memphis, Tennessee, 38120, United States
Texas Cancer Care
Fort Worth, Texas, 76104, United States
Oncology Consultants
Houston, Texas, 77024, United States
Scott and White Clinic
Temple, Texas, 76508, United States
Northern Virginia Oncology Group, P.C.
Fairfax, Virginia, 22031, United States
Seattle Cancer Care Alliance
Seattle, Washington, 98109, United States
Dean Medical Center
Madison, Wisconsin, 53715, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Edith A. Perez, MD
Mayo Clinic
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 11, 2001
First Posted
August 5, 2003
Study Start
January 1, 2001
Last Updated
July 24, 2008
Record last verified: 2006-09