Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Breast Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Trial of Sequential Chemotherapy Using Doxorubicin, Paclitaxel, and Cyclophosphamide or Concurrent Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide Followed by Paclitaxel at 14 or 21 Day Intervals in Women With Node Positive Stage II/IIIA Breast Cancer
3 other identifiers
interventional
2,005
2 countries
19
Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Giving drugs at different times or combining more than one drug may kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known which chemotherapy regimen is more effective for breast cancer. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of chemotherapy consisting of either doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, or paclitaxel given at different times with that of combination chemotherapy consisting of doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel in treating women with stage II or stage IIIA breast cancer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3 breast-cancer
Started Sep 1997
19 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 1997
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 1, 1999
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2003
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2003
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 6, 2004
CompletedApril 29, 2020
April 1, 2020
5.6 years
November 1, 1999
April 28, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Disease free survival
4 years
Study Arms (4)
Sequential chemotherapy 21 days
EXPERIMENTALPatients received doxorubicin 60 mg/m\^2 every 3 weeks for four cycles followed by paclitaxel 175 mg/m\^2 every 3 weeks for four cycles followed by cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m\^2 every 3 weeks for four cycles.
Concurrent chemotherapy 14 days
EXPERIMENTALPatients received doxorubicin 60 mg/m\^2 plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m\^2 every 2 weeks for four cycles followed by paclitaxel 175 mg/m\^2 every 2 weeks for four cycles with filgrastim days 3 to 10 of each cycle at 5 µg/kg rounded to either 300 or 480 µg total dose.
Sequential chemotherapy 14 days
EXPERIMENTALPatients received doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 every 2 weeks for four cycles followed by paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 every 2 weeks for four cycles followed by cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 every 2 weeks for four cycles, with filgrastim days 3 to 10 of each cycle (a total of seven doses) at 5 µg/kg, which could be rounded to either 300 or 480 µg total dose.
Concurrent chemotherapy 21 days
EXPERIMENTALPatients received doxorubicin 60 mg/m\^2 plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m\^2 every 3 weeks for four cycles followed by paclitaxel 175 mg/m\^2 every 3 weeks for four cycles.
Interventions
given IV
given IV
given IV
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (19)
CCOP - Scottsdale Oncology Program
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85259-5404, United States
CCOP - Illinois Oncology Research Association
Peoria, Illinois, 61602, United States
CCOP - Carle Cancer Center
Urbana, Illinois, 61801, United States
CCOP - Cedar Rapids Oncology Project
Cedar Rapids, Iowa, 52403-1206, United States
CCOP - Iowa Oncology Research Association
Des Moines, Iowa, 10309-1016, United States
Siouxland Hematology-Oncology
Sioux City, Iowa, 51101-1733, United States
CCOP - Ochsner
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70121, United States
CCOP - Ann Arbor Regional
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48106, United States
CCOP - Duluth
Duluth, Minnesota, 55805, United States
Mayo Clinic Cancer Center
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
CentraCare Clinic
Saint Cloud, Minnesota, 56303, United States
CCOP - Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium
Omaha, Nebraska, 68131, United States
Quain & Ramstad Clinic, P.C.
Bismarck, North Dakota, 58501, United States
CCOP - Merit Care Hospital
Fargo, North Dakota, 58122, United States
Altru Health Systems
Grand Forks, North Dakota, 58201, United States
CCOP - Toledo Community Hospital Oncology Program
Toledo, Ohio, 43623-3456, United States
Rapid City Regional Hospital
Rapid City, South Dakota, 57709, United States
CCOP - Sioux Community Cancer Consortium
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, 57105-1080, United States
Saskatchewan Cancer Agency
Regina, Saskatchewan, S4S 6X3, Canada
Related Publications (13)
Muss HB, Berry DA, Cirrincione C, Budman DR, Henderson IC, Citron ML, Norton L, Winer EP, Hudis CA; Cancer and Leukemia Group B Experience. Toxicity of older and younger patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer: the Cancer and Leukemia Group B Experience. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Aug 20;25(24):3699-704. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.10.9710.
PMID: 17704418BACKGROUNDBerry DA, Cirrincione C, Henderson IC, Citron ML, Budman DR, Goldstein LJ, Martino S, Perez EA, Muss HB, Norton L, Hudis C, Winer EP. Estrogen-receptor status and outcomes of modern chemotherapy for patients with node-positive breast cancer. JAMA. 2006 Apr 12;295(14):1658-67. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.14.1658.
PMID: 16609087BACKGROUNDMuss H, Berry D, Cirrincione C, et al.: Toxicity of older and younger patients (pts) treated (Rx) with intensive adjuvant chemotherapy (Cx) for node-positive (N+) breast cancer (BC): the CALGB experience. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 24 (Suppl 18): A-559, 2006.
BACKGROUNDCampone M, Fumoleau P, Bourbouloux E, Kerbrat P, Roche H. Taxanes in adjuvant breast cancer setting: which standard in Europe? Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2005 Sep;55(3):167-75. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2005.04.003.
PMID: 16039867BACKGROUNDOrzano JA, Swain SM. Concepts and clinical trials of dose-dense chemotherapy for breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer. 2005 Dec;6(5):402-11. doi: 10.3816/CBC.2005.n.044.
PMID: 16381623BACKGROUNDBerry DA, Cirrincione C, Henderson IC, et al.: Effects of improvements in chemotherapy on disease-free and overall survival of estrogen-receptor negative, node-positive breast cancer: 20-year experience of the CALGB U.S. Breast Intergroup. [Abstract] Breast Cancer Res Treat 88 (Suppl 1): A-29, 2004.
BACKGROUNDCitron ML, Berry DA, Cirrincione C, et al.: Dose-dense (DD) AC followed by paclitaxel is associated with moderate, frequent anemia compared to sequential (S) and/or less DD treatment: update by CALGB on Breast Cancer Intergroup Trial C9741 with ECOG, SWOG, & NCCTG. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 23 (Suppl 16): A-620, 33s, 2005.
RESULTFornier M, Norton L. Dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy for primary breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2005;7(2):64-9. doi: 10.1186/bcr1007. Epub 2005 Feb 10.
PMID: 15743513RESULTHudis C, Citron M, Berry D, et al.: Five year follow-up of INT C9741: dose-dense (DD) chemotherapy (CRx) is safe and effective. [Abstract] Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 94 (Suppl 1): A-41, 2005.
RESULTSchwartz J, Domchek SM, Hwang WT, Fox K. Evaluation of anemia, neutropenia and skin toxicities in standard or dose-dense doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC)-paclitaxel or docetaxel adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2005 Feb;16(2):247-52. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdi058.
PMID: 15668278RESULTCitron ML, Berry DA, Cirrincione C, Hudis C, Winer EP, Gradishar WJ, Davidson NE, Martino S, Livingston R, Ingle JN, Perez EA, Carpenter J, Hurd D, Holland JF, Smith BL, Sartor CI, Leung EH, Abrams J, Schilsky RL, Muss HB, Norton L. Randomized trial of dose-dense versus conventionally scheduled and sequential versus concurrent combination chemotherapy as postoperative adjuvant treatment of node-positive primary breast cancer: first report of Intergroup Trial C9741/Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 9741. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Apr 15;21(8):1431-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.09.081. Epub 2003 Feb 13.
PMID: 12668651RESULTCitron M, Berry D, Cirrincione C, et al.: Superiority of dose-dense (DD) over conventional scheduling (CS) and equivalence of sequential (SC) vs. combination adjuvant chemotherapy (CC) for node-positive breast cancer (CALGB 9741, INT C9741). [Abstract] Breast Cancer Res Treat 76 (Suppl 1): A-15, 2002.
RESULTMetzger Filho O, Ballman K, Campbell J, Liu M, Ligibel J, Watson M, Chen E, Du L, Stover D, Carey L, Partridge A, Kirshner J, Muss H, Hudis C, Winer EP, Norton L, Symmans WF. Adjuvant Dose-Dense Chemotherapy in Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2025 Apr;43(10):1229-1239. doi: 10.1200/JCO-24-01875. Epub 2025 Jan 2.
PMID: 39746162DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Marc L. Citron, MD
ProHEALTH Care Associates, LLP
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 1, 1999
First Posted
September 6, 2004
Study Start
September 1, 1997
Primary Completion
April 1, 2003
Study Completion
June 1, 2003
Last Updated
April 29, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-04