NCT00003088

Brief Summary

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Giving drugs at different times or combining more than one drug may kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known which chemotherapy regimen is more effective for breast cancer. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of chemotherapy consisting of either doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, or paclitaxel given at different times with that of combination chemotherapy consisting of doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel in treating women with stage II or stage IIIA breast cancer.

Trial Health

90
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
2,005

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_3 breast-cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 1997

Geographic Reach
2 countries

19 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 1997

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 1, 1999

Completed
3.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2003

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2003

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 6, 2004

Completed
Last Updated

April 29, 2020

Status Verified

April 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

5.6 years

First QC Date

November 1, 1999

Last Update Submit

April 28, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

stage II breast cancerstage IIIA breast cancer

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Disease free survival

    4 years

Study Arms (4)

Sequential chemotherapy 21 days

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients received doxorubicin 60 mg/m\^2 every 3 weeks for four cycles followed by paclitaxel 175 mg/m\^2 every 3 weeks for four cycles followed by cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m\^2 every 3 weeks for four cycles.

Drug: cyclophosphamideDrug: doxorubicin hydrochlorideDrug: paclitaxel

Concurrent chemotherapy 14 days

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients received doxorubicin 60 mg/m\^2 plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m\^2 every 2 weeks for four cycles followed by paclitaxel 175 mg/m\^2 every 2 weeks for four cycles with filgrastim days 3 to 10 of each cycle at 5 µg/kg rounded to either 300 or 480 µg total dose.

Drug: cyclophosphamideDrug: doxorubicin hydrochlorideDrug: paclitaxel

Sequential chemotherapy 14 days

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients received doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 every 2 weeks for four cycles followed by paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 every 2 weeks for four cycles followed by cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 every 2 weeks for four cycles, with filgrastim days 3 to 10 of each cycle (a total of seven doses) at 5 µg/kg, which could be rounded to either 300 or 480 µg total dose.

Drug: cyclophosphamideDrug: doxorubicin hydrochlorideDrug: paclitaxel

Concurrent chemotherapy 21 days

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients received doxorubicin 60 mg/m\^2 plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m\^2 every 3 weeks for four cycles followed by paclitaxel 175 mg/m\^2 every 3 weeks for four cycles.

Drug: cyclophosphamideDrug: doxorubicin hydrochlorideDrug: paclitaxel

Interventions

given IV

Concurrent chemotherapy 14 daysConcurrent chemotherapy 21 daysSequential chemotherapy 14 daysSequential chemotherapy 21 days

given IV

Concurrent chemotherapy 14 daysConcurrent chemotherapy 21 daysSequential chemotherapy 14 daysSequential chemotherapy 21 days

given IV

Concurrent chemotherapy 14 daysConcurrent chemotherapy 21 daysSequential chemotherapy 14 daysSequential chemotherapy 21 days

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
1. Required Tumor Parameters 1.1 Patients with operable, histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the female breast and positive lymph nodes. Node positivity may be determined by either an axillary node dissection or a positive sentinel node finding by immunohistochemistry or histology. This includes any patient with one or more positive lymph nodes whose tumors are T0, T1, 2 or 3 and N1, N2, MO. Patients with metaplastic carcinoma are eligible. Bilateral disease does not exclude patients from entry. 1.2 Tumors that are locally advanced at diagnosis are not eligible. This is left to investigator judgment. Patients with tumors fixed to the chest wall, peau d'orange skin changes, skin ulcerations, or clinical inflammatory changes (T4 disease) are excluded from this study. Dermal lymphatic involvement noted on pathology without clinical inflammatory changes will not exclude a patient from this study. 1.3 Patients with any ERP/PgR status are eligible. 2. Prior treatment: 2.1 \<84 days from mastectomy or within 84 days of axillary dissection if the patient's most extensive breast surgery was a breast sparing procedure. 2.2 Surgical resection margins - All tumor should be removed by either a modified radical mastectomy or a segmental mastectomy. Node dissection: patients may have had either an axillary node dissection or sentinel lymph node biopsy before beginning treatment on protocol. * Mastectomy: There should be no evidence of gross or microscopic tumor at the surgical resection margins noted in the final surgery or pathology reports for patients who have had a modified radical mastectomy. Patients with close margins (tumor \< 1 mm from margin) are eligible. * Segmental mastectomy (lumpectomy): Although clear margins are preferable, DCIS or LCIS at the surgical resection margin will not render a patient who has undergone a segmental mastectomy ineligible for this study. Invasive tumor at the final resection margin will render a patient ineligible. 2.3 No prior chemotherapy. 2.4 No prior radiation therapy for this malignancy. Patients who received radiation to the breast for DCIS are eligible. Patients who have had segmental mastectomy will be treated with radiotherapy according to standard procedures in the treating physician's institution after completion of all chemotherapy. Patients who have had modified radical mastectomy may also receive radiotherapy at the discretion of the treating physician according to institutional guidelines. 2.5 Patients may receive up to four weeks of tamoxifen therapy for this malignancy and still be eligible for study entry. Patients who received tamoxifen for purposes of chemoprevention (e.g., Breast Cancer Prevention Trial) or for other indications (including previous breast cancer) are eligible. Tamoxifen therapy should be discontinued before the patient is enrolled on this study. 3. Age \> 18. There is no upper age limit for enrollment on this study. 4. Required initial laboratory data: * Granulocyte count \> 1000/mm3 * Platelet count \> 100,000/mm3 * Bilirubin within upper limits of normal

Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (19)

CCOP - Scottsdale Oncology Program

Scottsdale, Arizona, 85259-5404, United States

Location

CCOP - Illinois Oncology Research Association

Peoria, Illinois, 61602, United States

Location

CCOP - Carle Cancer Center

Urbana, Illinois, 61801, United States

Location

CCOP - Cedar Rapids Oncology Project

Cedar Rapids, Iowa, 52403-1206, United States

Location

CCOP - Iowa Oncology Research Association

Des Moines, Iowa, 10309-1016, United States

Location

Siouxland Hematology-Oncology

Sioux City, Iowa, 51101-1733, United States

Location

CCOP - Ochsner

New Orleans, Louisiana, 70121, United States

Location

CCOP - Ann Arbor Regional

Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48106, United States

Location

CCOP - Duluth

Duluth, Minnesota, 55805, United States

Location

Mayo Clinic Cancer Center

Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States

Location

CentraCare Clinic

Saint Cloud, Minnesota, 56303, United States

Location

CCOP - Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium

Omaha, Nebraska, 68131, United States

Location

Quain & Ramstad Clinic, P.C.

Bismarck, North Dakota, 58501, United States

Location

CCOP - Merit Care Hospital

Fargo, North Dakota, 58122, United States

Location

Altru Health Systems

Grand Forks, North Dakota, 58201, United States

Location

CCOP - Toledo Community Hospital Oncology Program

Toledo, Ohio, 43623-3456, United States

Location

Rapid City Regional Hospital

Rapid City, South Dakota, 57709, United States

Location

CCOP - Sioux Community Cancer Consortium

Sioux Falls, South Dakota, 57105-1080, United States

Location

Saskatchewan Cancer Agency

Regina, Saskatchewan, S4S 6X3, Canada

Location

Related Publications (13)

  • Muss HB, Berry DA, Cirrincione C, Budman DR, Henderson IC, Citron ML, Norton L, Winer EP, Hudis CA; Cancer and Leukemia Group B Experience. Toxicity of older and younger patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer: the Cancer and Leukemia Group B Experience. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Aug 20;25(24):3699-704. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.10.9710.

    PMID: 17704418BACKGROUND
  • Berry DA, Cirrincione C, Henderson IC, Citron ML, Budman DR, Goldstein LJ, Martino S, Perez EA, Muss HB, Norton L, Hudis C, Winer EP. Estrogen-receptor status and outcomes of modern chemotherapy for patients with node-positive breast cancer. JAMA. 2006 Apr 12;295(14):1658-67. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.14.1658.

    PMID: 16609087BACKGROUND
  • Muss H, Berry D, Cirrincione C, et al.: Toxicity of older and younger patients (pts) treated (Rx) with intensive adjuvant chemotherapy (Cx) for node-positive (N+) breast cancer (BC): the CALGB experience. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 24 (Suppl 18): A-559, 2006.

    BACKGROUND
  • Campone M, Fumoleau P, Bourbouloux E, Kerbrat P, Roche H. Taxanes in adjuvant breast cancer setting: which standard in Europe? Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2005 Sep;55(3):167-75. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2005.04.003.

    PMID: 16039867BACKGROUND
  • Orzano JA, Swain SM. Concepts and clinical trials of dose-dense chemotherapy for breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer. 2005 Dec;6(5):402-11. doi: 10.3816/CBC.2005.n.044.

    PMID: 16381623BACKGROUND
  • Berry DA, Cirrincione C, Henderson IC, et al.: Effects of improvements in chemotherapy on disease-free and overall survival of estrogen-receptor negative, node-positive breast cancer: 20-year experience of the CALGB U.S. Breast Intergroup. [Abstract] Breast Cancer Res Treat 88 (Suppl 1): A-29, 2004.

    BACKGROUND
  • Citron ML, Berry DA, Cirrincione C, et al.: Dose-dense (DD) AC followed by paclitaxel is associated with moderate, frequent anemia compared to sequential (S) and/or less DD treatment: update by CALGB on Breast Cancer Intergroup Trial C9741 with ECOG, SWOG, & NCCTG. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 23 (Suppl 16): A-620, 33s, 2005.

    RESULT
  • Fornier M, Norton L. Dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy for primary breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2005;7(2):64-9. doi: 10.1186/bcr1007. Epub 2005 Feb 10.

  • Hudis C, Citron M, Berry D, et al.: Five year follow-up of INT C9741: dose-dense (DD) chemotherapy (CRx) is safe and effective. [Abstract] Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 94 (Suppl 1): A-41, 2005.

    RESULT
  • Schwartz J, Domchek SM, Hwang WT, Fox K. Evaluation of anemia, neutropenia and skin toxicities in standard or dose-dense doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC)-paclitaxel or docetaxel adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2005 Feb;16(2):247-52. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdi058.

  • Citron ML, Berry DA, Cirrincione C, Hudis C, Winer EP, Gradishar WJ, Davidson NE, Martino S, Livingston R, Ingle JN, Perez EA, Carpenter J, Hurd D, Holland JF, Smith BL, Sartor CI, Leung EH, Abrams J, Schilsky RL, Muss HB, Norton L. Randomized trial of dose-dense versus conventionally scheduled and sequential versus concurrent combination chemotherapy as postoperative adjuvant treatment of node-positive primary breast cancer: first report of Intergroup Trial C9741/Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 9741. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Apr 15;21(8):1431-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.09.081. Epub 2003 Feb 13.

  • Citron M, Berry D, Cirrincione C, et al.: Superiority of dose-dense (DD) over conventional scheduling (CS) and equivalence of sequential (SC) vs. combination adjuvant chemotherapy (CC) for node-positive breast cancer (CALGB 9741, INT C9741). [Abstract] Breast Cancer Res Treat 76 (Suppl 1): A-15, 2002.

    RESULT
  • Metzger Filho O, Ballman K, Campbell J, Liu M, Ligibel J, Watson M, Chen E, Du L, Stover D, Carey L, Partridge A, Kirshner J, Muss H, Hudis C, Winer EP, Norton L, Symmans WF. Adjuvant Dose-Dense Chemotherapy in Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2025 Apr;43(10):1229-1239. doi: 10.1200/JCO-24-01875. Epub 2025 Jan 2.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Breast Neoplasms

Interventions

CyclophosphamideDoxorubicinPaclitaxel

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsBreast DiseasesSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Phosphoramide MustardsNitrogen Mustard CompoundsMustard CompoundsHydrocarbons, HalogenatedHydrocarbonsOrganic ChemicalsPhosphoramidesOrganophosphorus CompoundsDaunorubicinAnthracyclinesNaphthacenesPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, CyclicPolycyclic CompoundsAminoglycosidesGlycosidesCarbohydratesTaxoidsCyclodecanesCycloparaffinsHydrocarbons, AlicyclicDiterpenesTerpenes

Study Officials

  • Marc L. Citron, MD

    ProHEALTH Care Associates, LLP

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 1, 1999

First Posted

September 6, 2004

Study Start

September 1, 1997

Primary Completion

April 1, 2003

Study Completion

June 1, 2003

Last Updated

April 29, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-04

Locations