Pain and Comfort During Functional Orthodontic Treatment With Laser or Ultrasounic Waves.
Patient-Reported Outcomes During Functional Treatment of Skeletal Class II Malocclusion With Low-Level Laser Versus Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound: A Randomized Non-controlled Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Pain, discomfort, and functional limitations are common during functional orthodontic treatment and may affect appliance acceptance, compliance, and treatment satisfaction. This randomized clinical trial will compare patient-reported outcomes associated with low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) and low-level laser therapy (LLLT) as adjuncts to functional orthopedic treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion. Forty growing patients with skeletal Class II Division 1 malocclusion will be randomly allocated to a LIPUS-assisted Modified Schmuth Activator group or an LLLT-assisted Modified Schmuth Activator group, with 20 patients in each group. All patients will be treated using a standardized Modified Schmuth Activator, which will be worn for 18 hours per day. LIPUS will be applied bilaterally over the temporomandibular joint regions, whereas LLLT will be administered to five points around the condylar region on each side. Patient-reported outcomes will be assessed using a Visual Analog Scale questionnaire evaluating soft-tissue tension, muscle pain, temporomandibular joint pain, difficulty in mouth opening, and overall satisfaction. Assessments will be performed at 7 days, 14 days, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after appliance insertion.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 2, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 30, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 30, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 25, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 1, 2026
CompletedOctober 1, 2026
September 1, 2026
9 months
September 25, 2026
September 25, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Change in the levels of soft tissue tension
Assessment will be performed using questionnaires via the Visual Analog scale (VAS). The Visual Analog Scale is a 100 mm horizontal line with two focal points at its beginning and end (0: no tension - 100: the worst tension).
Time 1: 1 week after the insertion of the appliance; Time 2: 2 weeks; Time 3: 6 weeks; Time 4: 3 months; Time 5: 6 months following the treatment initiation.
Change in the levels of muscle pain
Assessment will be performed using questionnaires via the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The Visual Analog Scale is a 100 mm horizontal line with two focal points at its beginning and end (0: no pain - 100: the worst pain).
Time 1: 1 week after after the insertion of the appliance; Time 2: 2 weeks; Time 3: 6 weeks; Time 4: 3 months; Time 5: 6 months following the treatment initiation.
Change in the levels of TMJ pain
Assessment will be performed using questionnaires via the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The Visual Analog Scale is a 100 mm horizontal line with two focal points at its beginning and end (0: no pain - 100: the worst pain).
Time 1: 1 week after the insertion of the appliance; Time 2: 2 weeks; Time 3: 6 weeks; Time 4: 3 months; Time 5: 6 months following the treatment initiation.
Change in the levels of difficulties in mouth opening.
Assessment will be performed using questionnaires via the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The Visual Analog Scale is a 100 mm horizontal line with two focal points at its beginning and end (0: no difficulties - 100: the worst difficulties).
Time 1: 1 week after the insertion of the appliance; Time 2: 2 weeks; Time 3: 6 weeks; Time 4: 3 months; Time 5: 6 months following the treatment initiation
Change in the levels of satisfaction.
Assessment will be performed using questionnaires via the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The Visual Analog Scale is a 100 mm horizontal line with two focal points at its beginning and end (0: no satisfaction - 100: the highest satisfaction).
Time 1: 1 week after the insertion of the appliance; Time 2: 2 weeks; Time 3: 6 weeks; Time 4: 3 months; Time 5: 6 months following the treatment initiation.
Study Arms (2)
Functional treatment + LIPUS
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will be treated using the Modified Schmuth Activator with low-intensity pulsed ultrasound
Functional treatment + LLLT
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants will be treated using the Modified Schmuth Activator with low-level laser therapy
Interventions
• In this group, low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) will be applied bilaterally to the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) region using the US PRO 2000™ 2nd Edition device. The device will generate 200-µs bursts of a 1-MHz sine wave at a pulse repetition frequency of 100 Hz, with a temporal average intensity of 0.03 W/cm². LIPUS will be administered twice weekly during the first month, once every two weeks during the second month, and subsequently once every three weeks until completion of active treatment. All sessions will be performed by the principal investigator to ensure consistency of the treatment protocol.
In this group, low-level laser therapy (LLLT) will be applied bilaterally around the condylar region using the Mercury™ laser device, with a power output of 0.20 W and a wavelength of 810 nm. The laser will be applied to five points on each side: the anterior, superior, inferior, and posterior regions of the condyle, as well as along the external auditory canal. Each point will receive 4 J of laser energy for 20 seconds. LLLT will be administered according to the same treatment schedule as LIPUS: twice weekly during the first month, once every two weeks during the second month, and subsequently once every three weeks until completion of active treatment.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Skeletal Class II Division 1 malocclusion with an ANB angle greater than 5°.
- Overjet exceeding 4 mm.
- Normal lower incisor inclination.
- Horizontal or average facial growth pattern.
- No previous orthodontic treatment.
- Evidence of a pubertal growth spurt at treatment initiation, as assessed by hand-wrist radiographs.
You may not qualify if:
- History of TMJ trauma
- Radiographic evidence of post- pubertal growth spurt.
- systemic disease affecting growth
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Damascus
Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic, DM20AM19, Syria
Related Publications (5)
Almrayati DM, Hajeer MY, Burhan AS, Almahdi WH, Jaber ST. A Novel Protocol to Accelerate Functional Orthopedic Treatment Using Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound in Patients With Skeletal Class II Malocclusion: A Preliminary Clinical Report. Cureus. 2026 Mar 11;18(3):e105067. doi: 10.7759/cureus.105067. eCollection 2026 Mar.
PMID: 41822256BACKGROUNDAlsilq MN, Youssef M. Dentoskeletal effects of aesthetic and conventional twin block appliances in the treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial. Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 13;15(1):1879. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-86219-0.
PMID: 39805909BACKGROUNDAbdulhadi A, Burhan AS, Hajeer MY, Hamadah O, Mahmoud G, Nawaya FR, Namera MO. Evaluation of the Functional Treatment of Patients With Skeletal Class II Malocclusion Using Low-Level Laser Therapy-Assisted Twin-Block Appliance: A Three-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial. Cureus. 2022 Mar 24;14(3):e23449. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23449. eCollection 2022 Mar.
PMID: 35345811BACKGROUNDNamera MO, Mahmoud G, Abdulhadi A, Burhan A. Effects of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) applied on the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) region on the functional treatment of class II malocclusion: A randomized controlled trial. Dent Med Probl. 2020 Jan-Mar;57(1):53-60. doi: 10.17219/dmp/112321.
PMID: 32307933BACKGROUNDAlmasri AMH, Hajeer MY, Ajaj MA, Almusawi AOA, Jaber ST, Zakaria AS, Alam MK. Patient Satisfaction Following Orthodontic Treatment: A Systematic Review. Cureus. 2024 Jul 25;16(7):e65339. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65339. eCollection 2024 Jul.
PMID: 39055972BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dima M. Almrayati, DDS, MSc
Damascus University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Mohammad Y. Hajeer, DDS, MSc, PhD
Damascus University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Wael Almahdi, DDS, MSc, PhD
Damascus University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 25, 2026
First Posted
October 1, 2026
Study Start
April 2, 2023
Primary Completion
December 30, 2023
Study Completion
January 30, 2024
Last Updated
October 1, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share