The Effect of Platelet-rich Plasma on the Rate and Type of Orthodontic Tooth Movement
Evaluation of the Rate and Type of Orthodontic Tooth Movement When Injecting Platelet-rich Plasma During Mini-implant-based Segmented En-masse Retraction of Upper Anterior Teeth: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to assess the effect of PRP on the rate and type of OTM during en-masse frictionless retraction of maxillary anterior teeth using a segmental arch technique. Thirty adult patients exhibiting class II division 1 malocclusion requiring upper first premolar extractions followed by en-masse retraction will participate in the study. They will be randomly and equally distributed into the PRP group (G1) and the control group (G2). The injection of PRP will be performed pre-retraction. The rate of orthodontic tooth movement will be assessed clinically by measuring the extraction space with a digital caliper. The cephalometric radiographs will evaluate the type of OTM at the beginning of en-masse retraction (T0) and at the middle of en-masse retraction (T1).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 24, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 12, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 15, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 10, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 15, 2023
CompletedNovember 15, 2023
November 1, 2023
1.6 years
November 10, 2023
November 10, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Rate of retraction
Assessment will be performed clinically by measuring the change in the extraction space. The amount of distance being retracted in millimeters will be divided by the duration of retraction in months to estimate the retraction rate.
At the middle of the retraction procedure (the middle of closing the extraction space); this assessment time is expected to occur within 2 to 3 months and 3 to 4 months after the onset of retraction in the experimental and control groups, respectively
Change in incisors' positions
The position of the incisal edges of the upper incisors will be measured according to a reference plance.
First time point (T0): one day before the beginning of retraction. Second time point (T1): in the middle of extraction space closure (expected to be within 2-3 months in the exp. group and 3-4 months in the control group).
Change in position of the root apex of the incisor vertically (UIA-v).
This variable represents the distance between the upper root apex and X reference plane (line drawn from ANS to PNS which is called the palatal plane SPP). Lateral cephalograms will be taken, and this variable will be measured in millimeters.
First time point (T0): one day before the beginning of retraction. Second time point (T1): in the middle of extraction space closure (expected to be within 2-3 months in the exp. group and 3-4 months in the control group).
Change in position of the incisal edge of the incisor vertically (UIE-v).
This variable represents the distance between the upper incisal edge and X reference plane. Lateral cephalograms will be taken and this variable is going to be measured in millimeters.
First time point (T0): one day before the beginning of retraction. Second time point (T1): in the middle of extraction space closure (expected to be within 2-3 months in the exp. group and 3-4 months in the control group).
Change in position of the root apex of the incisor horizontally (UIA-h)
This variable represents the distance between the upper root apex and Y reference plane (line perpendicular to SPP at lateral PT). Lateral cephalograms will be taken and this variable is going to be measured in millimeters.
First time point (T0): one day before the beginning of retraction. Second time point (T1): in the middle of extraction space closure (expected to be within 2-3 months in the exp. group and 3-4 months in the control group).
Change in position of the incisal edge of the incisor horizontally (UIE-h)
This variable represents the distance between the upper incisal edge and Y reference line. Lateral cephalograms will be taken and this variable is going to be measured in millimeters.
First time point (T0): one day before the beginning of retraction. Second time point (T1): in the middle of extraction space closure (expected to be within 2-3 months in the exp. group and 3-4 months in the control group).
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Change in the UI/SPP angle
First time point (T0): one day before the beginning of retraction. Second time point (T1): in the middle of extraction space closure (expected to be within 2-3 months in the exp. group and 3-4 months in the control group).
Change in the SNA angle
First time point (T0): one day before the beginning of retraction. Second time point (T1): in the middle of extraction space closure (expected to be within 2-3 months in the exp. group and 3-4 months in the control group).
Change in the ANB angle
First time point (T0): one day before the beginning of retraction. Second time point (T1): in the middle of extraction space closure (expected to be within 2-3 months in the exp. group and 3-4 months in the control group).
Change in Overbite
First time point (T0): one day before the beginning of retraction. Second time point (T1): in the middle of extraction space closure (expected to be within 2-3 months in the exp. group and 3-4 months in the control group).
Study Arms (2)
PRP group
EXPERIMENTALPRP will be injected in the palatal mucosa of the upper anterior teeth to accelerate orthodontic tooth movement. Patients in this group will undergo en-masse retraction of their upper front teeth using the same technique as the control group.
Traditional retraction group
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn this group, patients will undergo en-masse retraction of their upper front teeth using a frictionless method by using coil springs attached between the anterior portion of the dental arch (which is an anterior segment only) to the miniscrews placed between the upper second premolars and the upper first molars.
Interventions
The PRP will be prepared according to a well-established technique and then injected into the palatal mucosa of the upper anterior teeth before retraction.
The anterior teeth will be moved backward in an en-masse retraction way using a frictionless method. The anterior teeth will be manipulated as one block. Coil springs will be stretched between the power arms (in the anterior area) to the miniscrews placed in the posterior area bilaterally.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age range between 16 and 27 years
- Class II division I malocclusion in which extraction of upper first premolars is indicated
- skeletal class II relationships (4°\<ANB\<10°),
- Non-growing patients
- No maxillary constriction
- overjet \>5 and \<10 mm
- normal overbite of 0-50%
- normal anterior facial height
- No systemic disease.
You may not qualify if:
- patients who have undergone previous orthodontic treatment
- patients who need orthopedic surgery
- moderate to severe anterior crowding (Disharmony Dento-Maxillary (DDM≥3)
- Poor oral hygiene,
- long-term use of medical drugs, especially NSAIDs
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Aleppo University
Aleppo, AI20 3JZ, Syria
Related Publications (7)
Khlef HN, Hajeer MY, Ajaj MA, Heshmeh O. Evaluation of Treatment Outcomes of En masse Retraction with Temporary Skeletal Anchorage Devices in Comparison with Two-step Retraction with Conventional Anchorage in Patients with Dentoalveolar Protrusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Contemp Clin Dent. 2018 Oct-Dec;9(4):513-523. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_661_18.
PMID: 31772456BACKGROUNDOzaki H, Tominaga JY, Hamanaka R, Sumi M, Chiang PC, Tanaka M, Koga Y, Yoshida N. Biomechanical aspects of segmented arch mechanics combined with power arm for controlled anterior tooth movement: A three-dimensional finite element study. J Dent Biomech. 2015 Jan 8;6:1758736014566337. doi: 10.1177/1758736014566337. eCollection 2015.
PMID: 25610497BACKGROUNDAl-Naoum F, Hajeer MY, Al-Jundi A. Does alveolar corticotomy accelerate orthodontic tooth movement when retracting upper canines? A split-mouth design randomized controlled trial. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Oct;72(10):1880-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2014.05.003. Epub 2014 May 14.
PMID: 25128922BACKGROUNDAl-Imam GMF, Ajaj MA, Hajeer MY, Al-Mdalal Y, Almashaal E. Evaluation of the effectiveness of piezocision-assisted flapless corticotomy in the retraction of four upper incisors: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Dent Med Probl. 2019 Oct-Dec;56(4):385-394. doi: 10.17219/dmp/110432.
PMID: 31794163BACKGROUNDGulec A, Bakkalbasi BC, Cumbul A, Uslu U, Alev B, Yarat A. Effects of local platelet-rich plasma injection on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement in a rat model: A histomorphometric study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017 Jan;151(1):92-104. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.05.016.
PMID: 28024792BACKGROUNDAngel SL, Samrit VD, Kharbanda OP, Duggal R, Kumar V, Chauhan SS, Coshic P. Effects of submucosally administered platelet-rich plasma on the rate of tooth movement. Angle Orthod. 2022 Jan 1;92(1):73-79. doi: 10.2319/011221-40.1.
PMID: 34491291BACKGROUNDAl-Sibaie S, Hajeer MY. Assessment of changes following en-masse retraction with mini-implants anchorage compared to two-step retraction with conventional anchorage in patients with class II division 1 malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Orthod. 2014 Jun;36(3):275-83. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjt046. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
PMID: 23787192BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Mohammad Y Hajeer, DDS MSc PhD
Professor of Orthodontics, Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Damascus
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 10, 2023
First Posted
November 15, 2023
Study Start
February 24, 2019
Primary Completion
September 12, 2020
Study Completion
December 15, 2021
Last Updated
November 15, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share