NCT06133361

Brief Summary

This study aims to assess the effect of PRP on the rate and type of OTM during en-masse frictionless retraction of maxillary anterior teeth using a segmental arch technique. Thirty adult patients exhibiting class II division 1 malocclusion requiring upper first premolar extractions followed by en-masse retraction will participate in the study. They will be randomly and equally distributed into the PRP group (G1) and the control group (G2). The injection of PRP will be performed pre-retraction. The rate of orthodontic tooth movement will be assessed clinically by measuring the extraction space with a digital caliper. The cephalometric radiographs will evaluate the type of OTM at the beginning of en-masse retraction (T0) and at the middle of en-masse retraction (T1).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2019

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 24, 2019

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 12, 2020

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 15, 2021

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 10, 2023

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 15, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

November 15, 2023

Status Verified

November 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1.6 years

First QC Date

November 10, 2023

Last Update Submit

November 10, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Rate of retraction

    Assessment will be performed clinically by measuring the change in the extraction space. The amount of distance being retracted in millimeters will be divided by the duration of retraction in months to estimate the retraction rate.

    At the middle of the retraction procedure (the middle of closing the extraction space); this assessment time is expected to occur within 2 to 3 months and 3 to 4 months after the onset of retraction in the experimental and control groups, respectively

  • Change in incisors' positions

    The position of the incisal edges of the upper incisors will be measured according to a reference plance.

    First time point (T0): one day before the beginning of retraction. Second time point (T1): in the middle of extraction space closure (expected to be within 2-3 months in the exp. group and 3-4 months in the control group).

  • Change in position of the root apex of the incisor vertically (UIA-v).

    This variable represents the distance between the upper root apex and X reference plane (line drawn from ANS to PNS which is called the palatal plane SPP). Lateral cephalograms will be taken, and this variable will be measured in millimeters.

    First time point (T0): one day before the beginning of retraction. Second time point (T1): in the middle of extraction space closure (expected to be within 2-3 months in the exp. group and 3-4 months in the control group).

  • Change in position of the incisal edge of the incisor vertically (UIE-v).

    This variable represents the distance between the upper incisal edge and X reference plane. Lateral cephalograms will be taken and this variable is going to be measured in millimeters.

    First time point (T0): one day before the beginning of retraction. Second time point (T1): in the middle of extraction space closure (expected to be within 2-3 months in the exp. group and 3-4 months in the control group).

  • Change in position of the root apex of the incisor horizontally (UIA-h)

    This variable represents the distance between the upper root apex and Y reference plane (line perpendicular to SPP at lateral PT). Lateral cephalograms will be taken and this variable is going to be measured in millimeters.

    First time point (T0): one day before the beginning of retraction. Second time point (T1): in the middle of extraction space closure (expected to be within 2-3 months in the exp. group and 3-4 months in the control group).

  • Change in position of the incisal edge of the incisor horizontally (UIE-h)

    This variable represents the distance between the upper incisal edge and Y reference line. Lateral cephalograms will be taken and this variable is going to be measured in millimeters.

    First time point (T0): one day before the beginning of retraction. Second time point (T1): in the middle of extraction space closure (expected to be within 2-3 months in the exp. group and 3-4 months in the control group).

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Change in the UI/SPP angle

    First time point (T0): one day before the beginning of retraction. Second time point (T1): in the middle of extraction space closure (expected to be within 2-3 months in the exp. group and 3-4 months in the control group).

  • Change in the SNA angle

    First time point (T0): one day before the beginning of retraction. Second time point (T1): in the middle of extraction space closure (expected to be within 2-3 months in the exp. group and 3-4 months in the control group).

  • Change in the ANB angle

    First time point (T0): one day before the beginning of retraction. Second time point (T1): in the middle of extraction space closure (expected to be within 2-3 months in the exp. group and 3-4 months in the control group).

  • Change in Overbite

    First time point (T0): one day before the beginning of retraction. Second time point (T1): in the middle of extraction space closure (expected to be within 2-3 months in the exp. group and 3-4 months in the control group).

Study Arms (2)

PRP group

EXPERIMENTAL

PRP will be injected in the palatal mucosa of the upper anterior teeth to accelerate orthodontic tooth movement. Patients in this group will undergo en-masse retraction of their upper front teeth using the same technique as the control group.

Biological: PRP injection

Traditional retraction group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

In this group, patients will undergo en-masse retraction of their upper front teeth using a frictionless method by using coil springs attached between the anterior portion of the dental arch (which is an anterior segment only) to the miniscrews placed between the upper second premolars and the upper first molars.

Procedure: En-masse retraction of upper anterior teeth

Interventions

PRP injectionBIOLOGICAL

The PRP will be prepared according to a well-established technique and then injected into the palatal mucosa of the upper anterior teeth before retraction.

Also known as: platelet-rich plasma (PRP)
PRP group

The anterior teeth will be moved backward in an en-masse retraction way using a frictionless method. The anterior teeth will be manipulated as one block. Coil springs will be stretched between the power arms (in the anterior area) to the miniscrews placed in the posterior area bilaterally.

Traditional retraction group

Eligibility Criteria

Age16 Years - 27 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • age range between 16 and 27 years
  • Class II division I malocclusion in which extraction of upper first premolars is indicated
  • skeletal class II relationships (4°\<ANB\<10°),
  • Non-growing patients
  • No maxillary constriction
  • overjet \>5 and \<10 mm
  • normal overbite of 0-50%
  • normal anterior facial height
  • No systemic disease.

You may not qualify if:

  • patients who have undergone previous orthodontic treatment
  • patients who need orthopedic surgery
  • moderate to severe anterior crowding (Disharmony Dento-Maxillary (DDM≥3)
  • Poor oral hygiene,
  • long-term use of medical drugs, especially NSAIDs

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Aleppo University

Aleppo, AI20 3JZ, Syria

Location

Related Publications (7)

  • Khlef HN, Hajeer MY, Ajaj MA, Heshmeh O. Evaluation of Treatment Outcomes of En masse Retraction with Temporary Skeletal Anchorage Devices in Comparison with Two-step Retraction with Conventional Anchorage in Patients with Dentoalveolar Protrusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Contemp Clin Dent. 2018 Oct-Dec;9(4):513-523. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_661_18.

    PMID: 31772456BACKGROUND
  • Ozaki H, Tominaga JY, Hamanaka R, Sumi M, Chiang PC, Tanaka M, Koga Y, Yoshida N. Biomechanical aspects of segmented arch mechanics combined with power arm for controlled anterior tooth movement: A three-dimensional finite element study. J Dent Biomech. 2015 Jan 8;6:1758736014566337. doi: 10.1177/1758736014566337. eCollection 2015.

    PMID: 25610497BACKGROUND
  • Al-Naoum F, Hajeer MY, Al-Jundi A. Does alveolar corticotomy accelerate orthodontic tooth movement when retracting upper canines? A split-mouth design randomized controlled trial. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Oct;72(10):1880-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2014.05.003. Epub 2014 May 14.

    PMID: 25128922BACKGROUND
  • Al-Imam GMF, Ajaj MA, Hajeer MY, Al-Mdalal Y, Almashaal E. Evaluation of the effectiveness of piezocision-assisted flapless corticotomy in the retraction of four upper incisors: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Dent Med Probl. 2019 Oct-Dec;56(4):385-394. doi: 10.17219/dmp/110432.

    PMID: 31794163BACKGROUND
  • Gulec A, Bakkalbasi BC, Cumbul A, Uslu U, Alev B, Yarat A. Effects of local platelet-rich plasma injection on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement in a rat model: A histomorphometric study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017 Jan;151(1):92-104. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.05.016.

    PMID: 28024792BACKGROUND
  • Angel SL, Samrit VD, Kharbanda OP, Duggal R, Kumar V, Chauhan SS, Coshic P. Effects of submucosally administered platelet-rich plasma on the rate of tooth movement. Angle Orthod. 2022 Jan 1;92(1):73-79. doi: 10.2319/011221-40.1.

    PMID: 34491291BACKGROUND
  • Al-Sibaie S, Hajeer MY. Assessment of changes following en-masse retraction with mini-implants anchorage compared to two-step retraction with conventional anchorage in patients with class II division 1 malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Orthod. 2014 Jun;36(3):275-83. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjt046. Epub 2013 Jun 20.

    PMID: 23787192BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Malocclusion, Angle Class II

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

MalocclusionTooth DiseasesStomatognathic Diseases

Study Officials

  • Mohammad Y Hajeer, DDS MSc PhD

    Professor of Orthodontics, Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Damascus

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 10, 2023

First Posted

November 15, 2023

Study Start

February 24, 2019

Primary Completion

September 12, 2020

Study Completion

December 15, 2021

Last Updated

November 15, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations