Activator vs the EF Class II Standard in the Treatment of Severe Overjet in Angle Class II Division 1 Malocclusion
A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Activator Versus the EF (Functional Education) Class II Standard in the Treatment of Severe Overjet in Angle Class II Division 1 Malocclusion in Vietnamese Population: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical effectiveness of reducing severe overjet in Angle Class II division 1 malocclusion between Activator and the EF (Functional Education) class II standard in treating. Methods: A randomized clinical trial was conducted on a total of ̉60 patients with an Angle Class II, division 1 malocclusion (ANB angle ≥ 4°, basic normal maxillary status), and an overjet of ≥ 6 mm in the developmental stage (CS1-CS3) who were eligible for the study. Thus, the sample consisted of 60 subjects (29 girls and 31 boys) with a mean age of 9.7 ± 1.31 years. The investigators designed the study to treat patients, randomly assigning them by lottery to receive either an activator or the EF (Functional Education) class II standard. The activator versus the EF (Functional Education) class II standard group consisted of 30 subjects (17 girls, 13 boys) and 30 subjects (12 girls, 18 boys), respectively. The changes in skeletal, dental, and soft tissue were recorded before, at 6 months of treatment. Blinding was not performed. After six months of treatment, the study's endpoint was reached.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 8, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 22, 2024
CompletedAugust 22, 2024
August 1, 2024
1.1 years
August 8, 2024
August 20, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To compare the clinical effectiveness of reducing severe overjet in Angle Class II division 1 malocclusion between Activator and the EF (Functional Education) class II standard in treating.
Every month, the research participants from both groups underwent regular re-examinations, during which they collected cephalometric radiographs for assessment at two specific time points: T0, before treatment, and T1 after 6 months of treatment. A Planmeca ProMax® 2D digital X-ray system (Planmeca, Poland) captured the cephalometric radiographs. The Dental Hospital used the licensed AudaxCeph program to accurately draw lines and perform measurements on the cephalometric images.
6 months
Study Arms (2)
Skeletal, dental, soft tissue index changes in Activator group
EXPERIMENTALActivator The researcher made wax impressions of the study's patients for both the activator and treatment monitoring. The researcher instructed the patients to use the activator device for 12-14 hours daily, with a minimum requirement of 12 hours. Precise ablation of the activator created plastic surfaces that guided the process of tooth eruption.
Skeletal, dental, soft tissue index changes in EF class II standard group
EXPERIMENTALEF class II standard The researcher monitored the study children through therapy. The research used four types of EF class II standard appliances (Orthoplus, France). Patients were required to wear the EF class II standard device for at least 12 hours every day, including the entire night and at least 2 hours during the day.
Interventions
After being interviewed and provided by a doctor with two kinds of appliances (Activator and EF class II standard) for treating class II malocclusion, the patients choose their appliance. The patients were separated into two groups (30 in each). Group 1 was treated with an Activator appliance (Activator group), whereas Group 2 was treated with an EF class II standard appliance (EF line group)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Vietnamese children between the ages of 7 and 12 with central incisors erupted
- Angle Class II division 1 malocclusion (ANB angle ≥ 4°, basic normal maxillary status)
- Severe overjet ≥ 6mm
- The developmental stage (CS1-CS3)
- No previous orthodontic treatment
- Agreeing to engage in the study
You may not qualify if:
- The young with crossbite
- Severe crowding
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Orthodontics, Ho Chi Minh City Dental Hospital
Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Lam Nguyen Le, PhD
Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 8, 2024
First Posted
August 22, 2024
Study Start
April 1, 2023
Primary Completion
May 1, 2024
Study Completion
June 1, 2024
Last Updated
August 22, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-08