Cephalometric Changes Following Retraction of the Upper Anterior Teeth Stimulated by Low-intensity Electrical Current
Evaluation of the Skeletal, Dental and Soft-tissue Changes After En-masse Retraction of the Upper Anterior Teeth Stimulated by Low-intensity Electrical Current: A Single-centered, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
36
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Thirty-six patients requiring extraction of maxillary first premolars and en-masse retraction of upper anterior teeth will participate in the study. They will be randomly assigned into two groups: low-intensity electrical stimulation group (LIES) and traditional retraction group (TRAD) after the leveling and alignment phase is completed. En-masse retraction will be initiated in both groups via closed nickel-titanium coil springs that applying 250 g of force on each side, Mini-implants will be inserted to provide the highest level of anchorage. The skeletal, dental, and soft tissue changes will be detected using lateral cephalometric radiographs, which will be obtained pretreatment, pre-, and post-en-masse retraction of the anterior teeth.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started May 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 15, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 10, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 15, 2024
CompletedJanuary 14, 2025
January 1, 2025
7 months
October 10, 2024
January 12, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (18)
Duration of the en-masse retraction of anterior teeth
Assessment will be performed by calculating the time required to achieve complete retraction of the upper anterior teeth (six teeth) through clinical examination.
At the end of en-masse retraction which is expected to occur within 6-10 months.
Change in the SNA angle
This angle represents the position of the upper jaw in the cephalometric analysis in the anteroposterior direction. Lateral cephalograms will be taken and this angle is going to be measured in degrees.
The cephalogram will be taken at three times: (T0) before the orthodontic treatment began, (T1) before the en-masse retraction began, (T3) at the end of the en-masse retraction phase (expected to occur within 6-10 months)
Change in the SNB angle
This angle represents the position of the lower jaw in the cephalometric analysis in the anteroposterior direction. Lateral cephalograms will be taken, and this angle will be measured in degrees.
The cephalogram will be taken at three times: (T0) before the orthodontic treatment began, (T1) before the en-masse retraction began, (T3) at the end of the en-masse retraction phase (expected to occur within 6-10 months)
Change in the ANB angle
This angle represents the relationship between the upper and lower jaws in the cephalometric analysis in the anteroposterior direction. Lateral cephalograms will be taken, and this angle will be measured in degrees.
The cephalogram will be taken at three times: (T0) before the orthodontic treatment began, (T1) before the en-masse retraction began, (T3) at the end of the en-masse retraction phase (expected to occur within 6-10 months)
Change in the SNPog angle
This angle represents the position of the chin in the cephalometric analysis in the anteroposterior direction. Lateral cephalograms will be taken, and this angle will be measured in degrees.
The cephalogram will be taken at three times: (T0) before the orthodontic treatment began, (T1) before the en-masse retraction began, (T3) at the end of the en-masse retraction phase (expected to occur within 6-10 months)
Change in the SN-GoMe angle
This angle represents the position of the lower jaw in the cephalometric analysis in the vertical direction. Lateral cephalograms will be taken, and this angle will be measured in degrees.
The cephalogram will be taken at three times: (T0) before the orthodontic treatment began, (T1) before the en-masse retraction began, (T3) at the end of the en-masse retraction phase (expected to occur within 6-10 months)
Change in the MM angle
This angle represents the amount of vertical divergence between the upper and lower jaws in the cephalometric analysis. Lateral cephalograms will be taken, and this angle will be measured in degrees.
The cephalogram will be taken at three times: (T0) before the orthodontic treatment began, (T1) before the en-masse retraction began, (T3) at the end of the en-masse retraction phase (expected to occur within 6-10 months)
Change in the Bjork's sum
This angle represents the amount of vertical divergence in the cephalometric analysis. Lateral cephalograms will be taken, and this angle will be measured in degrees.
The cephalogram will be taken at three times: (T0) before the orthodontic treatment began, (T1) before the en-masse retraction began, (T3) at the end of the en-masse retraction phase (expected to occur within 6-10 months)
Change in Y-axis angle
This angle represents the amount of vertical divergence in the cephalometric analysis. Lateral cephalograms will be taken, and this angle will be measured in degrees.
The cephalogram will be taken at three times: (T0) before the orthodontic treatment began, (T1) before the en-masse retraction began, (T3) at the end of the en-masse retraction phase (expected to occur within 6-10 months)
Change in the SN-U1
This angle represents the relationship of the upper anterior teeth with SN in the cephalometric analysis in the anteroposterior direction. Lateral cephalograms will be taken, and this angle is going to be measured in degrees
The cephalogram will be taken at three times: (T0) before the orthodontic treatment began, (T1) before the en-masse retraction began, (T3) at the end of the en-masse retraction phase (expected to occur within 6-10 months)
Change in the GoMe-L1 angle
This angle represents the relationship of the lower anterior teeth with the mandibular plane in the cephalometric analysis in the anteroposterior direction. Lateral cephalograms will be taken, and this angle will be measured in degrees.
The cephalogram will be taken at three times: (T0) before the orthodontic treatment began, (T1) before the en-masse retraction began, (T3) at the end of the en-masse retraction phase (expected to occur within 6-10 months)
Change in the IIA angle
This angle represents the relationship of the upper and lower anterior teeth in the cephalometric analysis in the anteroposterior direction. Lateral cephalograms will be taken, and this angle is going to be measured in degrees.
The cephalogram will be taken at three times: (T0) before the orthodontic treatment began, (T1) before the en-masse retraction began, (T3) at the end of the en-masse retraction phase (expected to occur within 6-10 months)
Change in the SV-U1E distance
This measurement represents the distance of the incisal edge of the maxillary incisors from the reference plane SV. Lateral cephalograms will be taken, and this measurement will be in millimeters.
The cephalogram will be taken at three times: (T0) before the orthodontic treatment began, (T1) before the en-masse retraction began, (T3) at the end of the en-masse retraction phase (expected to occur within 6-10 months)
Change in the SV-U1A distance
This measurement represents the distance of the apex of the maxillary incisors from the reference plane SV. Lateral cephalograms will be taken, and this measurement will be in millimeters.
The cephalogram will be taken at three times: (T0) before the orthodontic treatment began, (T1) before the en-masse retraction began, (T3) at the end of the en-masse retraction phase (expected to occur within 6-10 months)
Change in the Nasolabial angle
This angle represents the relationship of the upper lip with the nose in the cephalometric analysis. Lateral cephalograms will be taken, and this angle will be measured in degrees.
The cephalogram will be taken at three times: (T0) before the orthodontic treatment began, (T1) before the en-masse retraction began, (T3) at the end of the en-masse retraction phase (expected to occur within 6-10 months)
Change in the labiomental angle
This angle represents the relationship of the lower lip with the chin in the cephalometric analysis. Lateral cephalograms will be taken, and this angle will be measured in degrees.
The cephalogram will be taken at three times: (T0) before the orthodontic treatment began, (T1) before the en-masse retraction began, (T3) at the end of the en-masse retraction phase (expected to occur within 6-10 months)
Change in the UL-E Line distance
This measurement represents the relationship between the upper lip and the Ricketts line in cephalometric analysis. Lateral cephalograms will be taken, and this variable will be measured in mm.
The cephalogram will be taken at three times: (T0) before the orthodontic treatment began, (T1) before the en-masse retraction began, (T3) at the end of the en-masse retraction phase (expected to occur within 6-10 months)
Change in the LL-E Line distance
This measurement represents the relationship between the Lower lip and the Ricketts line in cephalometric analysis. Lateral cephalograms will be taken, and this variable will be measured in mm.
The cephalogram will be taken at three times: (T0) before the orthodontic treatment began, (T1) before the en-masse retraction began, (T3) at the end of the en-masse retraction phase (expected to occur within 6-10 months)
Study Arms (2)
Electrical Stimulation
EXPERIMENTALElectric current will be applied in this group of patients using a removable device.
Conventional treatment with no stimulation
ACTIVE COMPARATORNo acceleration method will be performed in this group
Interventions
A removable appliance will be used to accelerate orthodontic tooth movement by emitting electrical stimulation.
No additional appliances will be used. Only the traditional fixed appliances (braces).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult healthy patients, Male and female, Aged 18-25 years.
- Class II Division 1 malocclusion :
- Mild/moderate skeletal Class II (ANB= 5-7 degrees)
- Overjet ≤10
- Normal or excessive facial height (Clinically and then cephalometrically assessed using these three angles: mandibular/cranial base angle, maxillary/mandibular plane angle, and facial axis angle)
- Mild to moderate crowding ≤ 4
- Permanent occlusion.
- Existence of all the upper teeth (except third molars).
- Good oral and periodontal health:
- Probing depth \< 4 mm
- No radiographic evidence of bone loss.
- Gingival index ≤ 1
- Plaque index ≤ 1
You may not qualify if:
- Medical problems that affect tooth movement (corticosteroids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), …)
- Presence of primary teeth in the maxillary arch
- Missing permanent maxillary teeth (except third molars).
- Poor oral hygiene or Current periodontal disease:
- Probing depth ≥ 4 mm Radiographic evidence of bone loss Gingival index \> 1 Plaque index \> 1
- Patient had previous orthodontic treatment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Damascus
Damascus, Syria
Related Publications (4)
Spadari GS, Zaniboni E, Vedovello SA, Santamaria MP, do Amaral ME, Dos Santos GM, Esquisatto MA, Mendonca FA, Santamaria M Jr. Electrical stimulation enhances tissue reorganization during orthodontic tooth movement in rats. Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Jan;21(1):111-120. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1759-6. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
PMID: 26917494BACKGROUNDDavidovitch Z, Finkelson MD, Steigman S, Shanfeld JL, Montgomery PC, Korostoff E. Electric currents, bone remodeling, and orthodontic tooth movement. II. Increase in rate of tooth movement and periodontal cyclic nucleotide levels by combined force and electric current. Am J Orthod. 1980 Jan;77(1):33-47. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(80)90222-5.
PMID: 6243448BACKGROUNDShaadouh RI, Hajeer MY, Al-Sabbagh R, Alam MK, Mahmoud G, Idris G. A Novel Method to Accelerate Orthodontic Tooth Movement Using Low-Intensity Direct Electrical Current in Patients Requiring en-Masse Retraction of the Upper Anterior Teeth: A Preliminary Clinical Report. Cureus. 2023 May 24;15(5):e39438. doi: 10.7759/cureus.39438. eCollection 2023 May.
PMID: 37234453BACKGROUNDShaadouh RI, Hajeer MY, Alam MK, Sultan K, Aljabban O. Evaluation of the skeletal, dental, and soft-tissue changes after the en-masse retraction of upper anterior teeth stimulated by low-intensity electrical current: a randomized controlled clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jun 3;25(1):902. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06316-4.
PMID: 40462109DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Mohammad Younis Hajeer, DDS MSc PhD
Orthodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Damascus
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 10, 2024
First Posted
October 15, 2024
Study Start
May 1, 2023
Primary Completion
November 15, 2023
Study Completion
December 1, 2023
Last Updated
January 14, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share