Different Kinematics Within a Single-File System and Postoperative Pain
The Impact of Employing Different Kinematics Within a Single-File System on the Perception of Postoperative Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
75
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluating the influence of single file rotary system for root canal instrumentation using different kinematics on postoperative pain, the primary purpose: measuring post-operative pain by Numerical rating scale in a cohort population treatyed in Jordan Universoit of science and technology post graduate clinics with previously intittaed root canal treatement and could include any of the following: sex/gender, age groups (18-65 ), and healthy volunteers. The main questions it aims to answer \[is/are:
- Is there any difference in postoperative pain after root canal treatment with different kinamtics
- Is this correlated with the level of cytokines measured taken from inside the canal system before and after treament whioch will be analyzed by the ELISA Kit for pain biomarkers.
- Is this related to in vitro debris extrusion, and can it validate previous research with the same methodology for debris extrusion measurement Researchers will compare 5 groups, which are Canal pro jeni, Continuous clockwise rotation (CCR), Optimum Torque Reverse (OTR), Forward reciprocating motion (REC), and Twisted Adaptive motion (TFA). All motions will be used with the One Curve file system Participants will report the level of pain after traatment level of cytokines will be measured by taking samples from the periapical area before, during, and after trematemtn
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2024
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 10, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 24, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 10, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 13, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 10, 2026
ExpectedJuly 13, 2026
July 1, 2026
2.1 years
February 24, 2026
July 7, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Postoperative Pain
Pain will be assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The VAS is a self-reported instrument with scores ranging from a minimum of 0 (no pain) to a maximum of 10 (worst possible pain). Higher scores indicate a worse clinical outcome (more severe pain).
Up to 48 hours post-treatment
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Change in Cytokine Levels
From baseline up to Day 3 post-treatment
Study Arms (5)
canal pro Jeni
ACTIVE COMPARATORmotion kinematics by canal pro Jeni
Optimum Torque Reverse (OTR)
ACTIVE COMPARATORMotion kinematics by Optimum Torque Reverse (OTR)
Continuous clockwise rotation (CCR)
ACTIVE COMPARATORMotion kinematics by Continuous clockwise rotation (CCR)
Forward reciprocating motion (REC)
ACTIVE COMPARATORMotion kinematics by Forward reciprocating motion (REC)
Twisted Adaptive motion (TFA)
ACTIVE COMPARATORMotion kinematics by Twisted Adaptive motion (TFA)
Interventions
motor that is capable of doing the adaptive motion
endodontic motor with the ability to change reciprocating angles and speed
endodontic motor that is designed for rotate in Optimum Torque Reverse (OTR)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged between 18-65 year
- Fully mature roots
- Asymptomatic
- Not taking neither antibiotics nor analgesics withing last 2 weeks
- ASA I and ASA II
You may not qualify if:
- patients that are younger or older than the selected age group 18-65 years - Immature roots
- Symptomatic, presence of sinus tract, fistula, or swelling.
- patient on medication antibiotics or analgesics withing last 2 weeks -Pregnant women,
- retreatment cases,
- allergic reactions
- resorption in the relevant tooth,
- periapical abscess,
- apical resorption, systemic diseases,ASA III-VI
- inability to understand the treatment procedure
- Any mesial canals with initial apical file larger than ISO 20
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Jordan University of science and technology
Irbid, Northen, 22110, Jordan
Related Publications (22)
24. https://whyy.org/segments/reassessing-the-assessment-of-pain-how-the-numeric-scale-became-so-popular-in-health-care
BACKGROUNDGundogdu EC, Arslan H. Effects of Various Cryotherapy Applications on Postoperative Pain in Molar Teeth with Symptomatic Apical Periodontitis: A Preliminary Randomized Prospective Clinical Trial. J Endod. 2018 Mar;44(3):349-354. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.11.002. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
PMID: 29398090BACKGROUNDAl Omari TMN, La Rosa GRM, Albanna RHI, Tabnjh A, Papale F, Pedulla E. The effect of different kinematics on apical debris extrusion with a single-file system. Odontology. 2023 Oct;111(4):910-915. doi: 10.1007/s10266-023-00802-3. Epub 2023 Mar 14.
PMID: 36917401BACKGROUNDPirani C, Iacono F, Zamparini F, Generali L, Prati C. Retreatment of Experimental Carrier-Based Obturators with the Remover NiTi Instrument: Evaluation of Apical Extrusion and Effects of New Kinematics. Int J Dent. 2021 Oct 23;2021:2755680. doi: 10.1155/2021/2755680. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 34725547BACKGROUND19. J Morita Corporation (2016) DentaPort ZX Set OTR brochure. Available at: http://www.jmoritaeurope.de/cms/file s/MO_65827_Update_B_Dentaport_RZ_en.pdf. [Accessed on 3 September 2016]
BACKGROUNDGambarini G, Piasecki L, Miccoli G, Gaimari G, Di Giorgio R, Di Nardo D, Azim AA, Testarelli L. Classification and cyclic fatigue evaluation of new kinematics for endodontic instruments. Aust Endod J. 2019 Aug;45(2):154-162. doi: 10.1111/aej.12294. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
PMID: 30113735BACKGROUNDCapar ID, Ertas H, Ok E, Arslan H, Ertas ET. Comparative study of different novel nickel-titanium rotary systems for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals. J Endod. 2014 Jun;40(6):852-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.10.010. Epub 2013 Nov 7.
PMID: 24862716BACKGROUND16. https://www.kerrdental.com/ca/kerr-endodontics/elements-motor-adaptive-motion-shape#docs
BACKGROUNDAlOmari T, AlThobiti G, AlThobaiti S, AlOufi F, Masuadi E, Jamleh A. Incidence of postoperative pain after canal shaping by using Reciproc and Twisted File Adaptive systems: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Jul;24(7):2445-2450. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-03106-5. Epub 2019 Nov 1.
PMID: 31673858BACKGROUNDGambarini G, Gergi R, Naaman A, Osta N, Al Sudani D. Cyclic fatigue analysis of twisted file rotary NiTi instruments used in reciprocating motion. Int Endod J. 2012 Sep;45(9):802-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2012.02036.x. Epub 2012 Mar 19.
PMID: 22429241BACKGROUNDSaricam E, Kayaoglu G. Comparison of OneShape, 2Shape and One Curve endodontic instruments for debris and irrigant extrusion. Dent Med Probl. 2020 Jul-Sep;57(3):255-259. doi: 10.17219/dmp/119771.
PMID: 33064376BACKGROUNDAhn SY, Kim HC, Kim E. Kinematic Effects of Nickel-Titanium Instruments with Reciprocating or Continuous Rotation Motion: A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies. J Endod. 2016 Jul;42(7):1009-17. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.04.002. Epub 2016 May 13.
PMID: 27185740BACKGROUNDCaviedes-Bucheli J, Castellanos F, Vasquez N, Ulate E, Munoz HR. The influence of two reciprocating single-file and two rotary-file systems on the apical extrusion of debris and its biological relationship with symptomatic apical periodontitis. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Endod J. 2016 Mar;49(3):255-70. doi: 10.1111/iej.12452. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
PMID: 25816688BACKGROUNDYammine SD, Jabbour EA. Apically Extruded Debris following Programmed Over Instrumentation of Curved Canals with Three Nickel Titanium Rotary Instruments. Eur J Dent. 2021 Feb;15(1):20-26. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1714175. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
PMID: 32864731BACKGROUNDCaviedes-Bucheli J, Munoz HR, Azuero-Holguin MM, Ulate E. Neuropeptides in dental pulp: the silent protagonists. J Endod. 2008 Jul;34(7):773-88. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.03.010.
PMID: 18570980BACKGROUNDCaviedes-Bucheli J, Munoz-Alvear HD, Lopez-Moncayo LF, Kacharaju KR, Velasquez-Rivera AC, Carlosama-Recalde LA, Pazmino JC, Gomez-Sosa JF, Diaz-Barrera LE, Munoz HR. Substance P/calcitonin gene-related peptide and their receptors expression in human periodontal ligament after root canal preparation with five different systems. Int Endod J. 2024 May;57(5):576-585. doi: 10.1111/iej.14035. Epub 2024 Jan 31.
PMID: 38294105BACKGROUNDRelvas JB, Bastos MM, Marques AA, Garrido AD, Sponchiado EC Jr. Assessment of postoperative pain after reciprocating or rotary NiTi instrumentation of root canals: a randomized, controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2016 Nov;20(8):1987-1993. doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1692-0. Epub 2015 Dec 19.
PMID: 26685850BACKGROUNDSilva EJ, Carapia MF, Lopes RM, Belladonna FG, Senna PM, Souza EM, De-Deus G. Comparison of apically extruded debris after large apical preparations by full-sequence rotary and single-file reciprocating systems. Int Endod J. 2016 Jul;49(7):700-5. doi: 10.1111/iej.12503. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
PMID: 26174577BACKGROUNDSiqueira JF Jr, Rocas IN, Santos SR, Lima KC, Magalhaes FA, de Uzeda M. Efficacy of instrumentation techniques and irrigation regimens in reducing the bacterial population within root canals. J Endod. 2002 Mar;28(3):181-4. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200203000-00009.
PMID: 12017176BACKGROUNDSeltzer S, Naidorf IJ. Flare-ups in endodontics: I. Etiological factors. J Endod. 1985 Nov;11(11):472-8. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(85)80220-X. No abstract available.
PMID: 3868692BACKGROUNDPak JG, White SN. Pain prevalence and severity before, during, and after root canal treatment: a systematic review. J Endod. 2011 Apr;37(4):429-38. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.12.016.
PMID: 21419285BACKGROUNDKherlakian D, Cunha RS, Ehrhardt IC, Zuolo ML, Kishen A, da Silveira Bueno CE. Comparison of the Incidence of Postoperative Pain after Using 2 Reciprocating Systems and a Continuous Rotary System: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial. J Endod. 2016 Feb;42(2):171-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.10.011. Epub 2015 Nov 29.
PMID: 26614017BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Taher Mohammed Al Omari, BDS, MSc, JB Endo, M Endo RCSE
Jordan University of Science and Technology
- STUDY CHAIR
Aladdin Al Qudah, BDS, MSc, PhD
Jordan University of Science and Technology
- STUDY CHAIR
Lina Elsalem Elsalem, BDS, MSc, PhD
Jordan University of Science and Technology
- STUDY CHAIR
Rami AL Banna, BDS, JB Endo
Jordan University of Science and Technology
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- biomarker analysis technician
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 24, 2026
First Posted
July 13, 2026
Study Start
April 10, 2024
Primary Completion
May 10, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 10, 2026
Last Updated
July 13, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, ICF, CSR
- Time Frame
- june 2026 to june 2027
At the publication stage, the IPD will be shared