The Effect of Using Octenidine Hydrochloride as a Final Irrigation Solution on Teeth With Asymptomatic Apical Periodontitis on Postoperative Pain and Treatment Success: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Study
Octenidine Versus Chlorhexidine as the Final Irrigant in Single-visit Endodontics: a Randomized Clinical Trial of Early Postoperative Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
142
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This single-centre, randomized, parallel-group clinical trial compared two commonly used final irrigants in single-visit root canal treatment: octenidine dihydrochloride (OCT) and chlorhexidine (CHX). Adults with single-rooted, single-canal teeth diagnosed with asymptomatic apical periodontitis were treated in one visit under local anaesthesia and rubber-dam isolation. After shaping with sodium hypochlorite and smear-layer removal with EDTA, the assigned final irrigant was delivered and sonically activated. In both groups, OCT 0.1 percent or CHX 2 percent was activated using three 20-second cycles, and the solution was refreshed with 2 mL between cycles (approximate total 6 mL). Postoperative pain was recorded by participants on an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain) at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours. The primary outcome was pain at 48 hours. Secondary outcomes were pain at earlier time points, use of rescue analgesics within 0-48 hours, and unplanned urgent care within 48 hours. The aim was to determine whether OCT reduces early postoperative pain compared with CHX when used as the final irrigant in single-visit endodontics.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2023
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 8, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 18, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 20, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 8, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 15, 2025
CompletedSeptember 15, 2025
September 1, 2025
1.6 years
September 8, 2025
September 8, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain at 48 hours (NRS 0-10)
Patient-reported pain on the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain). Higher scores indicate worse pain. Assessed using a patient diary. Analysis compares OCT vs CHX at 48 hours; analysis population includes all randomized participants with an available 48 h NRS value.
48 hours after treatment
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Pain at 6 hours (NRS 0-10)
6 hours after treatment
Pain at 12 hours (NRS 0-10)
12 hours after treatment
Pain at 24 hours (NRS 0-10)
24 hours after treatment
Rescue analgesic consumption (0-48 hours)
0 to 48 hours after treatment
Unplanned urgent care within 48 hours
Up to 48 hours after treatment
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (1)
Analgesic-free participants (0-48 hours)
0 to 48 hours after treatment
Study Arms (2)
Octenidine 0.1% final irrigant
EXPERIMENTALSingle-visit root canal treatment with octenidine dihydrochloride 0.1% as the final irrigant. The irrigant was sonically activated using three 20-second cycles; the solution was refreshed with 2 mL between cycles (approximate total 6 mL). Delivery through a side-vented needle positioned short of the working length. The final irrigant was administered once, during the final irrigation phase. All other procedural steps were identical to the comparator arm.
Chlorhexidine 2% final irrigant
ACTIVE COMPARATORSingle-visit root canal treatment with chlorhexidine 2% as the final irrigant. The irrigant was sonically activated using the same protocol as the experimental arm: three 20-second cycles with the solution refreshed with 2 mL between cycles (approximate total 6 mL). Delivery through a side-vented needle positioned short of the working length. The final irrigant was administered once, during the final irrigation phase. All other procedural steps were identical to the experimental arm.
Interventions
Final intracanal irrigant (aqueous solution); single administration during the final irrigation phase. Sonic activation performed in three 20-second cycles; solution refreshed with 2 mL between cycles (approximate total 6 mL per canal). Delivered through a side-vented needle positioned short of the working length.
Final intracanal irrigant (aqueous solution); single administration during the final irrigation phase. Sonic activation performed in three 20-second cycles; solution refreshed with 2 mL between cycles (approximate total 6 mL per canal). Delivered through a side-vented needle positioned short of the working length.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults aged 18 to 65 years (inclusive)
- Single-rooted, single-canal tooth
- Diagnosis of asymptomatic apical periodontitis on periapical radiographs
- Able and willing to provide written informed consent
- Able to complete a 48-hour pain diary (6 h, 12 h, 24 h, 48 h)
You may not qualify if:
- Symptomatic apical periodontitis or acute apical abscess
- Previous root canal treatment of the study tooth
- Systemic condition requiring antibiotic prophylaxis or that interferes with pain assessment
- Pregnancy or lactation
- Known allergy or contraindication to study irrigants/materials
- Use of analgesics or anti-inflammatory drugs within 12 hours before treatment
- Inability to comply with study procedures
- More than one eligible tooth (one patient = one tooth rule; a pre-specified index tooth is selected)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Bezmialem Vakif University Dental Hospital - Department of Endodontics
Istanbul, 34093, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
fatma B peker, dds
Department of Endodontics, Bezmialem Vakif University, Istanbul, Turkey
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Irrigants prepared by a third party in identical opaque A/B syringes; allocation concealed with SNOSE; participants, care provider (operator), and outcomes assessor were blinded; A/B code broken only after database lock.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 8, 2025
First Posted
September 15, 2025
Study Start
March 8, 2023
Primary Completion
October 18, 2024
Study Completion
July 20, 2025
Last Updated
September 15, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share