Influence of Sonic Activation of Root Sealers on Post-Operative Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Aim: This clinical study aims to compare post-operative pain after single-visit root canal treatment of teeth with asymptomatic apical periodontitis using epoxy-resin based AH Plus and calcium silicate based Endosequence BC sealers with or without sonic activation. Materials and Methods: The study included 72 individuals having one first or second mandibular premolar tooth with asymptomatic apical periodontitis. They were randomly divided into 4 groups according to the root canal sealer (AH Plus or Endosequence BC) and activation protocol (sonic activation or non-activation) (n=18). Participants were ask to rate their post-operative pain intensity on a NRS scale as none, minimal, moderate, or severe after 24 h, 48 h, 72 h and 7 days following treatment. Patients were also asked to record the number of prescribed analgesic medication tablets (ibuprofen 400 mg) taken. The collected data were statistically analyzed at 0.05 significance level.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 16, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 21, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 28, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 3, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 7, 2024
CompletedMay 9, 2024
May 1, 2024
10 months
May 3, 2024
May 7, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
post operative pain
All participants were given a questionnaire based on a 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS), with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating the worst pain. Patients recorded their pain on days 1, 2, 3 and 7 after treatment. Pain intensity was rated into 4 categories using the NRS. None: (NRS 0); Mild (NRS 1-3); Moderate (NRS 4-7); Severe (NRS 8-10).
1 week
Study Arms (4)
AH Plus-NA
EXPERIMENTALAH Plus was mixed according to the manufacturer's instructions. The R40 gutta-percha (VDW) was coated with the sealer and inserted into the canal, and the root canals were filled using the single cone technique (SCT). The sealer was not activated.
AH Plus- EA
EXPERIMENTALAn EA 25/04 tip was coated with AH Plus and activated in the root canals for 10 seconds. Then, the R40 gutta-percha was coated with the sealer and inserted into the canal, and the root canals were filled using SCT.
BC-NA
EXPERIMENTALThe ready-to-use EndoSequence BC was injected into the root canals and no activation was performed. Then, the R40 gutta-percha was inserted into the canali and the root canals were filled using SCT.
BC-EA
EXPERIMENTALEndoSequence BC was injected into the root canals. An EA 25/04 tip was inserted 2 mm beyond the WL and activated for 10 s. Then, the R40 gutta-percha was inserted into the canal and the root canals were filled using SCT.
Interventions
Root canal treatment procedures explained in arm descriptions.
Root canal treatment procedures explained in arm descriptions.
Root canal treatment procedures explained in arm descriptions.
Root canal treatment procedures explained in arm descriptions.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Mandibular first and second premolar teeth diagnosed with asymptomatic apical periodontitis
- Single rooted teeth with a single canal.
You may not qualify if:
- Previous root canal treatment
- Use of any analgesic or antibiotics in the last 7 days
- Symptomatic teeth
- Sinus tract
- Presence of advanced periodontal problem (probing depth \>4 mm)
- Complications during treatment such as broken file, ledging
- Teeth with extensive coronal destruction.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Mustafa Kemal University
Hatay, Antakya, 31000, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (7)
Fonseca B, Coelho MS, Bueno CEDS, Fontana CE, Martin AS, Rocha DGP. Assessment of Extrusion and Postoperative Pain of a Bioceramic and Resin-Based Root Canal Sealer. Eur J Dent. 2019 Jul;13(3):343-348. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-3399457. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
PMID: 31794999RESULTGundogar M, Sezgin GP, Kaplan SS, Ozyurek H, Uslu G, Ozyurek T. Postoperative pain after different irrigation activation techniques: a randomized, clinical trial. Odontology. 2021 Apr;109(2):385-392. doi: 10.1007/s10266-020-00553-5. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
PMID: 32915346RESULTAslan T, Donmez Ozkan H. The effect of two calcium silicate-based and one epoxy resin-based root canal sealer on postoperative pain: a randomized controlled trial. Int Endod J. 2021 Feb;54(2):190-197. doi: 10.1111/iej.13411. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
PMID: 32929721RESULTGraunaite I, Skucaite N, Lodiene G, Agentiene I, Machiulskiene V. Effect of Resin-based and Bioceramic Root Canal Sealers on Postoperative Pain: A Split-mouth Randomized Controlled Trial. J Endod. 2018 May;44(5):689-693. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2018.02.010. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
PMID: 29571915RESULTWiesse PEB, Silva-Sousa YT, Pereira RD, Estrela C, Domingues LM, Pecora JD, Sousa-Neto MD. Effect of ultrasonic and sonic activation of root canal sealers on the push-out bond strength and interfacial adaptation to root canal dentine. Int Endod J. 2018 Jan;51(1):102-111. doi: 10.1111/iej.12794. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
PMID: 28543092RESULTLopes FC, Zangirolami C, Mazzi-Chaves JF, Silva-Sousa AC, Crozeta BM, Silva-Sousa YTC, Sousa-Neto MD. Effect of sonic and ultrasonic activation on physicochemical properties of root canal sealers. J Appl Oral Sci. 2019 Sep 9;27:e20180556. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0556.
PMID: 31508791RESULTYilmaz K, Sari M. Influence of sonic activation of epoxy-resin and calcium silicate sealer on postoperative pain: a patient-blinded, parallel group, randomized clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2024 Oct 23;24(1):1268. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05049-0.
PMID: 39443924DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- The patients were blinded to the chosen root canal sealer and activation protocol.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 3, 2024
First Posted
May 7, 2024
Study Start
January 16, 2023
Primary Completion
November 21, 2023
Study Completion
November 28, 2023
Last Updated
May 9, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share