A First in Human Study to Compare Feasibility of Inertial Cavitation Irrigation to SNI in Root Canal Treatment.
Comparative Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Root Canal Preparation After Irrigation Using Endodontic Needle and Inertial Cavitation: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
10
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The study design is a single-center 2-arm randomized controlled clinical trial. 10 subjects (teeth) requiring a root canal treatment will be enrolled in 2 groups (5 in each group). The aim of the study is to compare the postoperative pain intensity levels in patients with asymptomatic teeth diagnosed for non-surgical orthograde root canal treatment that are disinfected during the root canal treatment procedure by manual irrigation with sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) solution using an endodontic needle or by a inertial cavitation-generating device.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started May 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 10, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 10, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 16, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 31, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 31, 2022
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 25, 2024
CompletedJuly 25, 2024
July 1, 2024
21 days
May 10, 2022
October 3, 2023
July 9, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Clinical Postoperative Pain
Pain intensity levels were graded using Visual Analog Scale (VAS). This scale is a horizontal 100 mm bar, marked in every 10mm with two ends. One end (0) indicated "no pain" and the other end (100) indicated "worst pain possible". Categorization of pain scores is as follows: 0-4 mm = No Pain, 5-44 mm = Mild Pain, 45-74 mm = Moderate Pain, 75-100 mm = severe pain.
6 hours
Clinical Postoperative Pain
Pain intensity levels were graded using Visual Analog Scale (VAS). This scale is a horizontal 100 mm bar, marked in every 10mm with two ends. One end (0) indicated "no pain" and the other end (100) indicated "worst pain possible". Categorization of pain scores is as follows: 0-4 mm = No Pain, 5-44 mm = Mild Pain, 45-74 mm = Moderate Pain, 75-100 mm = severe pain.
24 hours
Clinical Postoperative Pain
Pain intensity levels were graded using Visual Analog Scale (VAS). This scale is a horizontal 100 mm bar, marked in every 10mm with two ends. One end (0) indicated "no pain" and the other end (100) indicated "worst pain possible". Categorization of pain scores is as follows: 0-4 mm = No Pain, 5-44 mm = Mild Pain, 45-74 mm = Moderate Pain, 75-100 mm = severe pain.
48 hours
Clinical Postoperative Pain
Pain intensity levels were graded using Visual Analog Scale (VAS). This scale is a horizontal 100 mm bar, marked in every 10mm with two ends. One end (0) indicated "no pain" and the other end (100) indicated "worst pain possible". Categorization of pain scores is as follows: 0-4 mm = No Pain, 5-44 mm = Mild Pain, 45-74 mm = Moderate Pain, 75-100 mm = severe pain.
72 hours
Clinical Postoperative Pain
Pain intensity levels were graded using Visual Analog Scale (VAS). This scale is a horizontal 100 mm bar, marked in every 10mm with two ends. One end (0) indicated "no pain" and the other end (100) indicated "worst pain possible". Categorization of pain scores is as follows: 0-4 mm = No Pain, 5-44 mm = Mild Pain, 45-74 mm = Moderate Pain, 75-100 mm = severe pain.
1 week
Study Arms (2)
Conventional irrigation
ACTIVE COMPARATORRoot canal cleaning will be performed by manual irrigation with sodium hypochlorite NaOCl solution.
Inertial cavitation
EXPERIMENTALRoot canal cleaning will be performed by inertial cavitation-generating device.
Interventions
The participant will be treated by manual irrigation with sodium hypochlorite NaOCl.
The participant will be treated by inertial cavitation-generating device, that generates hydraulic cavitation to clean root canals deeper and more effectively than other existing systems.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Physical status classification system described was used for patients' recruitment. Healthy patients, who were classified by the American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) as ASA I and II
- Patients with the age of 18 and over
- Patients who were diagnosed as in need of non-surgical orthograde root canal treatment of an asymptomatic tooth
- Tooth without signs of previously initiated Root Canal Therapy
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant and lactating females
- Patients with chronic periodontal diseases
- Patients with sensitivity or adverse reactions to any medication or materials that were used throughout the treatment procedure
- Patients with acute periapical periodontitis
- Patients with acute periodontal abscess
- Patients who could not abide by the follow-up time
- Patients who used analgesics 1-week prior or antibiotics 1-month prior to treatment
- Uncooperative patients
- Teeth that cannot be made functional nor restored or difficult to access teeth with no importance (wisdom teeth)
- Teeth with poor prognosis, for example, due to deep root caries or big root resorption
- Teeth with more than/or equal 4 mm periodontal pocket depth
- Teeth with an inaccessible root end
- Teeth with apical resorption or a radiologically not clearly defined apex
- Fractured teeth
- Teeth with immature or open apices
- +2 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Lumendo AGlead
Study Sites (1)
İstanbul Medipol Universitesi, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Endodontics
Istanbul, Unkapanı, Fatih, 34083, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Mark Bispinghoff
- Organization
- Lumendo
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tan Firat EYÜBOĞLU, DDS, MDS
İstanbul Medipol University, Department of Endodontics, İstanbul/Türkiye
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Mutlu ÖZCAN, DDS, MDS
İstanbul Medipol University, Istanbul Turkey
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DEVICE FEASIBILITY
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 10, 2022
First Posted
May 16, 2022
Study Start
May 10, 2022
Primary Completion
May 31, 2022
Study Completion
May 31, 2022
Last Updated
July 25, 2024
Results First Posted
July 25, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share