NCT07637240

Brief Summary

This is a prospective, observational, blinded clinical study with the purpose of assessing the safety of a non-invasive decision support system for the identification and management of shock (the CRUISE system). Researchers will compare the recommendations provided by the CRUISE system with those executed as part of the standard of care by transport paramedics and medics in acute ill adult critically ill patients in shock or requiring active resuscitation being transported by helicopter (STAT MedEvac) to Presbyterian Hospital. Planned total enrollment is 60 patients.

Trial Health

65
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
14mo left

Started Jul 2026

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 3, 2026

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 9, 2026

Completed
22 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2026

Expected
10 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2027

4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2027

Last Updated

June 9, 2026

Status Verified

June 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

10 months

First QC Date

April 3, 2026

Last Update Submit

June 5, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

HelicopterShockTransportResuscitationTraumaMedicalDeviceSTAT MedvecEmergency

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • CRUISE system decisions Versus Standard Care by Transport decisions - total time to resuscitate

    Measurable Outcome Description: 1.Overall comparison between CRUISE GEN system \& Standard Care by Transport paramedics in amount of time spent on resuscitating acute ill adult critically ill patients in shock. Name of Measurement: Total Length of time to resuscitate Measurement Tool: CRUISE Device clock data collected Versus Standard Care Device Clock data collected

    Up to 4 hours of monitoring

Study Arms (1)

Observational Blinded Group

Device: Observation blinded group with the purpose of assessing the safety of a non-invasive decision support system for the identification and management of shock (the CRUISE system).

Interventions

The sensor device will be removed either by STAT MedEvac personnel or by the investigator after arrival at the hospital. The patient will receive their standard care upon hospital arrival. The sensor device will be manually retrieved by the investigator, and deidentified physiological, and waveform data will be loaded to a research server. Maintain a linkage list to connect this deidentified data back to the original patient. Prehospital XMLs are downloaded from SQL database as XMLs, they are then processed and appended to STATA tables. The primary key (PRID) is then linked to the noninvasive monitors with the same key and temporally matched if key is not present. EHR is linked through secondary keys (MRN and FIN). Further EHR linkage is done by perfectly matching Protected Health Information (PHI) patient name and date of admission from trauma registry. An arbitrary study ID variable is created for each subject, and a linkage list is saved along with all other PHI information

Observational Blinded Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 100 Years
Sexall(Gender-based eligibility)
Gender Eligibility DetailsMale Female
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Critical ill patients being transported to the hospital by EMS to the core tertiary UPMC hospitals (UPMC Presbyterian, Shadyside, Mercy, and Passavant).

You may qualify if:

  • All adult patients with signs of shock evaluated, treated, and/or transported by Emergency Medical Services under medical oversight of UPMC EMS Medical Directors and/or arriving at UPMC facilities with which the PI and Co-investigators routinely have access to the records.

You may not qualify if:

  • Age \< 18 years
  • Active atrial fibrillation or irregular rhythm
  • Open chest
  • Known right ventricular failure

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (9)

  • Food and Drug Administration. "Guidance for industry: oversight of clinical investigations-a risk-based approach to monitoring." Silver Spring, MD: FDA (2013).

    BACKGROUND
  • Lamia B, Kim HK, Severyn DA, Pinsky MR. Cross-comparisons of trending accuracies of continuous cardiac-output measurements: pulse contour analysis, bioreactance, and pulmonary-artery catheter. J Clin Monit Comput. 2018 Feb;32(1):33-43. doi: 10.1007/s10877-017-9983-4. Epub 2017 Feb 10.

    PMID: 28188408BACKGROUND
  • Summers RL, Kolb JC, Woodward LH, Galli RL. Differentiating systolic from diastolic heart failure using impedance cardiography. Acad Emerg Med. 1999 Jul;6(7):693-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1999.tb00437.x.

    PMID: 10433528BACKGROUND
  • Summers RL, Kolb JC, Woodward LH, Galli RL. Diagnostic uses for thoracic electrical bioimpedance in the emergency department: clinical case series. Eur J Emerg Med. 1999 Sep;6(3):193-9. doi: 10.1097/00063110-199909000-00004.

    PMID: 10622382BACKGROUND
  • Siegel LC, Shafer SL, Martinez GM, Ream AK, Scott JC. Simultaneous measurements of cardiac output by thermodilution, esophageal Doppler, and electrical impedance in anesthetized patients. J Cardiothorac Anesth. 1988 Oct;2(5):590-5. doi: 10.1016/0888-6296(88)90049-x.

    PMID: 17171947BACKGROUND
  • Michard F, Chemla D, Richard C, Wysocki M, Pinsky MR, Lecarpentier Y, Teboul JL. Clinical use of respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure to monitor the hemodynamic effects of PEEP. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999 Mar;159(3):935-9. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.159.3.9805077.

    PMID: 10051276BACKGROUND
  • Michard F, Boussat S, Chemla D, Anguel N, Mercat A, Lecarpentier Y, Richard C, Pinsky MR, Teboul JL. Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000 Jul;162(1):134-8. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.162.1.9903035.

    PMID: 10903232BACKGROUND
  • Ramsey SD, Saint S, Sullivan SD, Dey L, Kelley K, Bowdle A. Clinical and economic effects of pulmonary artery catheterization in nonemergent coronary artery bypass graft surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2000 Apr;14(2):113-8. doi: 10.1016/s1053-0770(00)90001-6.

    PMID: 10794325BACKGROUND
  • Connors AF Jr, Speroff T, Dawson NV, Thomas C, Harrell FE Jr, Wagner D, Desbiens N, Goldman L, Wu AW, Califf RM, Fulkerson WJ Jr, Vidaillet H, Broste S, Bellamy P, Lynn J, Knaus WA. The effectiveness of right heart catheterization in the initial care of critically ill patients. SUPPORT Investigators. JAMA. 1996 Sep 18;276(11):889-97. doi: 10.1001/jama.276.11.889.

    PMID: 8782638BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

ShockWounds and InjuriesEmergencies

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Pathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsDisease Attributes

Study Officials

  • Hernando Gomez, MD

    University of Pittsburgh

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Howard R Stein, MS

CONTACT

Hernando Gomez, MD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 3, 2026

First Posted

June 9, 2026

Study Start (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2027

Last Updated

June 9, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

The plan is not to share any data outside the study team. The DOD requires all vendors to sign NDAs and commit to the rules of the study. Any party that may have access to the data will be part of the study team and committed thru NDAs \& subcontracts.