NCT07625475

Brief Summary

Temporal summation (TS) and offset analgesia (OA) are widely used psychophysical endpoints in pain research that index different components of central nociceptive processing. While crossover designs are commonly used in experimental pain studies to reduce between-participant variability, the design-stability of these endpoints under repeated testing during experimental sensitisation is not well characterised. This study compared the design-stability of mechanical TS (Sumscore) and offset analgesia magnitude (OffA) in a two-period, vehicle-controlled crossover trial of capsaicin-evoked secondary hyperalgesia in healthy adults. The primary aim was methodological: to determine whether session-order effects differ between TS and OffA when these are used as outcome measures in two-period crossover designs of capsaicin-induced central sensitisation. Topical capsaicin was used as a reversible experimental intervention to create a controlled, transient state of secondary hyperalgesia rather than as a therapeutic intervention. The study informs endpoint selection in future quantitative sensory testing (QST) crossover trials.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
16

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2024

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2024

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 30, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 30, 2025

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 22, 2026

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 4, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

June 4, 2026

Status Verified

June 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

12 months

First QC Date

May 22, 2026

Last Update Submit

June 3, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

temporal summationoffset analgesiatopical capsaicinsecondary hyperalgesiaquantitative sensory testing (QST)crossover trialsession-order effectcentral sensitisation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Mechanical temporal summation (Sumscore)

    Sumscore is a summed pinprick temporal-summation response computed from a train of 16 repeated 256 mN pinprick stimuli delivered perpendicularly to the skin at 1 Hz, paced by a metronome. Pain ratings (NPRS 0-10) immediately after each stimulus were summed (Clouse et al., 2021). The primary Sumscore endpoint was pre-specified as the average of the lateral and inferior testing sites at the lateral elbow, expressed as a baseline-normalised ratio.

    Baseline and 10, 20, 30, and 40 min post-intervention (within each of two sessions, separated by a minimum 1-week washout)

  • Offset analgesia magnitude (OffA)

    OffA was measured during a three-phase stepped-stimulus thermal protocol (32-45-46-45-32°C; T1/T2/T3 phases) using a 32 x 32 mm Peltier contact thermode (TSA-II NeuroSensory Analyzer, Medoc AMS). Continuous pain ratings were collected via CoVAS (0-100) at 10 Hz. OA magnitude was quantified as peak minus nadir CoVAS during the 46°C hold and the subsequent 45°C phase. The primary OffA endpoint was pre-specified as the duration-averaged value across three thermal hold durations (5, 10, and 15 s at 46°C), expressed as a baseline-normalised ratio.

    Baseline and 10, 20, 30, and 40 min post-intervention (within each of two sessions, separated by a minimum 1-week washout)

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Within-session temporal stability (ICC(2,1)) of Sumscore and OffA

    10, 20, 30, and 40 minutes post-intervention

  • Differential design-sensitivity (Measure × Intervention × Period interaction)

    10, 20, 30, and 40 minutes post-intervention, across two crossover periods separated by a minimum 1-week washout.

Study Arms (2)

Arm 1: Sequence A-to-B (Capsaicin first)

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants received topical 0.075% capsaicin (Zostrix) cream (5 mL) in Period 1, followed by topical inert (Lubriderm) vehicle (5 mL) in Period 2. Periods were separated by a minimum 1-week washout. n = 6.

Drug: Topical 0.075% capsaicin cream (Zostrix)Other: Topical vehicle lotion (Lubriderm)

Arm 2: Sequence B-to-A (Vehicle first)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants received topical inert (Lubriderm) vehicle (5 mL) in Period 1, followed by topical 0.075% capsaicin (Zostrix) cream (5 mL) in Period 2. Periods were separated by a minimum 1-week washout. n = 10.

Drug: Topical 0.075% capsaicin cream (Zostrix)Other: Topical vehicle lotion (Lubriderm)

Interventions

5 mL of 0.075% capsaicin cream (Zostrix; Hi-Tech Pharmacal, Amityville, NY, USA) applied to a 5 x 10 cm target region on the lateral elbow and to bilateral C5-C6 cervicothoracic dermatomes (total 15 mL). The cream was massaged into the skin by a gloved investigator until no residue was visible. Used as an experimental probe to evoke transient, reversible secondary hyperalgesia; not under therapeutic evaluation.

Arm 1: Sequence A-to-B (Capsaicin first)Arm 2: Sequence B-to-A (Vehicle first)

5 mL of inert vehicle lotion (Lubriderm; Johnson \& Johnson, Montgomery, NJ, USA) applied to the same dermatomes as the capsaicin condition (total 15 mL), using the identical preparation and massage technique. Matched to the capsaicin cream for colour and texture.

Arm 1: Sequence A-to-B (Capsaicin first)Arm 2: Sequence B-to-A (Vehicle first)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Healthy adult volunteers (≥18 years of age)
  • Able to provide written informed consent in English

You may not qualify if:

  • Current or chronic pain
  • Neurological disease
  • Skin conditions or sensitivity over the test sites to capsaicin
  • Contraindications to thermal stimulation of the skin
  • Musculoskeletal conditions that could alter somatosensory processing
  • Use of analgesic medications within 24 hours prior to each session
  • Use of caffeine within 24 hours prior to each session
  • Use of alcohol within 24 hours prior to each session

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Human Health Sciences, University of Guelph

Guelph, Ontario, N1G2W1, Canada

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Dwan K, Li T, Altman DG, Elbourne D. CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised crossover trials. BMJ. 2019 Jul 31;366:l4378. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4378.

    PMID: 31366597BACKGROUND
  • Clouse JA, et al. The reliability of a temporal summation Sumscore. (2021)

    BACKGROUND
  • Grill JD, Coghill RC. Transient analgesia evoked by noxious stimulus offset. J Neurophysiol. 2002 Apr;87(4):2205-8. doi: 10.1152/jn.00730.2001.

    PMID: 11929939BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Hyperalgesia

Interventions

Capsaicin

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Somatosensory DisordersSensation DisordersNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Polyunsaturated AlkamidesAmidesOrganic ChemicalsAlkenesHydrocarbons, AcyclicHydrocarbonsCatecholsPhenolsBenzene DerivativesHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, CyclicSolanaceous AlkaloidsAlkaloidsHeterocyclic CompoundsFatty Acids, MonounsaturatedFatty Acids, UnsaturatedFatty AcidsLipids

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
By design, participants, the investigator who applied the creams and collected the outcome data, and the data analyst were blinded to allocation. The randomisation sequence was computer-generated by a research assistant not involved in testing and concealed in sequentially sealed, opaque envelopes; capsaicin and vehicle creams were matched for colour and texture and dispensed in unlabelled containers. Because topical 0.075% capsaicin can produce perceptible burning and visible erythema, participant and investigator blinding may have been incompletely maintained. Participant allocation guesses were collected and investigator awareness of allocation was not formally assessed. The data analyst remained blinded through data lock and application of pre-specified exclusion criteria, and was unblinded only after the analysis dataset was finalised.
Purpose
BASIC SCIENCE
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: Two-period crossover. Participants were randomised in a 1:1 intended allocation (actual 6:10) to one of two sequences (capsaicin-first or vehicle-first). Sessions were separated by a minimum 1-week washout.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 22, 2026

First Posted

June 4, 2026

Study Start

May 1, 2024

Primary Completion

April 30, 2025

Study Completion

April 30, 2025

Last Updated

June 4, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

De-identified individual participant data (IPD) and statistical analysis code will be available from the corresponding author on reasonable request, subject to a data-use agreement and institutional ethics/data-sharing requirements. Materials required to reproduce the intervention and assessment protocol are described in the published Methods and Supplementary Materials.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
On request following publication of the primary manuscript.
Access Criteria
Reasonable request to the corresponding author for non-commercial research use, subject to a data-use agreement consistent with University of Guelph data-sharing policy.

Locations