Effectiveness of Vibratory Versus Cold Stimuli on Pain Perception in Children
1 other identifier
interventional
72
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Local anesthesia is an anxiety-provoking procedure. Pain control is important for effective behavior guidance, specially among pediatric patients. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of Buzzy® as a topical anesthetic in pain perception through two ways: once using vibration mode without the cold pack and the other using the cold pack without vibration and comparing it to topical anesthetic gel during different anesthetic techniques Methods: A randomized controlled clinical trial involving 72 healthy cooperative patients aged 5-9 years. They will be allocated to receive local anesthesia either using the vibration mode of Buzzy Bee (test group) or the cold pack of Buzzy Bee (test group) or conventional topical anesthetic gel (control group). Pain response will be assessed using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and SEM scale.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 17, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 23, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 24, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 25, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 25, 2025
CompletedFebruary 24, 2025
February 1, 2025
1 month
February 17, 2025
February 20, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain perception during needle insertion in different anesthetic techniques Using SEM scale
Objective method of pain assessment using SEM (sound, eye and movement scale). It is a behavioral assessment tool to evaluate pain and distress responses in children during dental procedures. It uses scores from 0 till 3 according to increasing levels of distress.
during the procedure (needle insertion)
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Pain will be assessed after local anesthesia injection by means of Visual analogue scale.
immediately after the procedure (needle insertion)
Study Arms (3)
topical anesthesia
ACTIVE COMPARATORTopical anesthetic gels are applied prior to injection at the injection site to minimize pain upon insertion of the needle during local anesthesia
vibration
EXPERIMENTALVibration using a vibrating devise (Buzzy) can help reduce the pain during local anesthesia injection. It is placed extra-orally before and during needle insertion
cold pack
EXPERIMENTALCold pack provided with the Buzzy device will be used without the vibration mode of the device. It is applied extra-orally before and during needle insertion.
Interventions
gels applied directly to the mucous membranes to provide localized relief of pain by numbing the area. They typically contain active ingredients such as lidocaine, benzocaine, or prilocaine, which work by blocking nerve signals to reduce sensation and discomfort
The vibration generated by the Buzzy device functions as a non-pharmacological agent that can reduce pain perception in children based on the principles of the Gate Control Theory of Pain.
cold packs are also provided by the Buzzy device. they act as non-pharmacological agents that can reduce pain perception in children based on the Gate Control Theory of Pain.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients indicated for simple restorative procedures.
- Children with physical status ASA I, II.
- Children with no learning disabilities
- Positive or definitely positive behavior during preoperative assessments according to the Frankl Scale.
- Patients whom parents will give consent to participate
You may not qualify if:
- Patients allergic to local anesthesia or having a family history of allergy to local anesthesia.
- Patients with acute oral or facial infection (swelling and/or cellulites)
- Having active sites of pathosis in the area of injection that could affect anesthetic assessment.
- Children with special health care needs.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of Dentistry- Alexandria University
Alexandria, 21511, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Lecturer of Pediatric Dentistry
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 17, 2025
First Posted
February 24, 2025
Study Start
February 23, 2025
Primary Completion
March 25, 2025
Study Completion
March 25, 2025
Last Updated
February 24, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-02