Electronic Anesthetic Efficacy Prof. Ali Rokia Ph.D. Al-Andalus University Prof . Mouetaz Kheirallah Ph.D ArabUST

NCT07257432 | Active Not Recruiting DMC

• 1 other identifier: ArabUST
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 30
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 2

Brief Summary

A Spilt Mouth Clinical Comparative Evaluation Of The Electronic Anesthetic Efficacy Comparison of traditional local anesthesia with electronic local anesthesia in terms of the ability to reduce pain during injection and the duration of the anesthetic effect

Conditions

Pain Perception

Keywords

Dental Anesthesia

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• Onset time

  was considered as the period between the end of the injection and the first subsequent Onset time was considered as the period between the end of the injection and the first subsequent readings without response. After this period, the tooth was tested every 10 minutes until readings returned to the baseline threshold. Each subject was asked to record the time of return to normal sensation in the lower lip

  2 month

Secondary Outcomes (1)

• Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

  2 month

Other Outcomes (1)

• duration of the anesthesia

  2 month

Study Arms (2)

Electronic syringe therapeutic intervention arm

EXPERIMENTAL

During the appointment, the subjects randomly received 1.8 ml of 2% plain lidocaine for the Intraoral Mental nerve block on both sides (experimental and control). A Carpule syringe with an aspiration and short needles 30G were used on the control side, while Smartject was used on the experimental side

Drug: Experimental group: Electronic syringe therapeutic intervention arm; Drug: control group: therapeutic intervention using a traditional syringe

therapeutic intervention using a traditional syringe

EXPERIMENTAL

During the appointment, the subjects randomly received 1.8 ml of 2% plain lidocaine for the Intraoral Mental nerve block on both sides (experimental and control). A Carpule syringe with an aspiration and short needles 30G were used on the control side, while Smartject was used on the experimental side

Drug: Experimental group: Electronic syringe therapeutic intervention arm; Drug: control group: therapeutic intervention using a traditional syringe

Interventions

Experimental group: Electronic syringe therapeutic intervention arm DRUG

Intraoral Mental nerve block on both sides (experimental and control). A Carpule syringe with an aspiration and short needles 30G were used on the control side, while Smartject was used on the experimental side

Also known as: anesthesia pen x

Electronic syringe therapeutic intervention arm; therapeutic intervention using a traditional syringe

control group: therapeutic intervention using a traditional syringe DRUG

During the appointment, the subjects randomly received 1.8 ml of 2% plain lidocaine for the Intraoral Mental nerve block on both sides (experimental and control). A Carpule syringe with an aspiration and short needles 30G were used on the control side

Also known as: surgimax

Electronic syringe therapeutic intervention arm; therapeutic intervention using a traditional syringe

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 20 Years - 30 Years
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64)

You may not qualify if:

• allergic to local anesthetics ,females during menstural cycle ,bad oral care.

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Mouetaz Kheirallah: lead

Study Sites (2)

Al Andalus University

Tartus, Al Kadmous, Syria

Location

Arab University

Hama, Syria

Location

Related Publications (1)

• Douglas BL. Electronic dental anesthesia. Anesth Prog. 1993;40(3):99-100. No abstract available.

  PMID: 7645794 BACKGROUND

Study Officials

• Ali G Rokia, ph.D

  Al-Andalus University

  STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: DOUBLE
• Who Masked: CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
• Masking Details: single blinded
• Purpose: TREATMENT
• Intervention Model: CROSSOVER
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: Ph.D., OMFS, DDS, Associate Professor

Model Details: The split-mouth design was applied to the study group, with one arm for therapeutic intervention involving Smartject injection , and the other arm involving traditional injectors

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: November 16, 2025
• First Posted: December 2, 2025
• Study Start: September 24, 2025
• Primary Completion: September 24, 2025
• Study Completion (Estimated): May 30, 2026
• Last Updated: December 2, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-11

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will not share

Locations

SY (2)