Hyperangulated vs Standard Videolaryngoscopy vs Direct Laryngoscopy for Double-Lumen Endobronchial Tube Intubation
Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Hyperangulated and Standard Curvature Blade Video Laryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Double-Lumen Endobronchial Tube Intubation
2 other identifiers
interventional
180
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This is a prospective, randomized, single-center, three-arm, open-label, low-risk medical device clinical study conducted at the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Trakya University Medical Faculty. The study aims to compare the efficacy, safety, and clinical usability of three laryngoscopy methods for double-lumen endotracheal tube (DLT) intubation in patients undergoing elective thoracic surgery requiring one-lung ventilation: (i) C-MAC hyperangulated (D-blade) videolaryngoscopy, (ii) C-MAC Macintosh blade videolaryngoscopy, and (iii) direct Macintosh laryngoscopy. The primary outcome is the total time to successful DLT placement (in seconds), defined as the interval from the end of mask ventilation to fiberoptic bronchoscopic confirmation of correct tube position. Secondary outcomes include glottic visualization quality (POGO score and Cormack-Lehane grade), intubation difficulty (Intubation Difficulty Scale), number of intubation attempts, need for auxiliary maneuvers, intubation-related complications, malposition rate, and postoperative airway symptoms (sore throat, dysphonia) assessed at 1, 6, and 24 hours postoperatively. Eligible patients are adults (≥18 years), ASA class I-III, scheduled for elective thoracic surgery requiring one-lung ventilation. Patients with anticipated difficult airway, emergency surgery, pregnancy, or prior upper airway surgery are excluded. A total of 180 patients will be enrolled and randomized 1:1:1 into three groups (60 per group) using computer-generated block randomization.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started May 2026
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 11, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 15, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 29, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 15, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 15, 2029
May 29, 2026
May 1, 2026
2.5 years
May 11, 2026
May 28, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Total time to successful double-lumen endotracheal tube placement-seconds
Total intubation time in seconds, defined as the interval from cessation of mask ventilation to the appearance of the first complete end-tidal CO2 waveform confirming successful endotracheal tube placement. Final tube position is verified by fiberoptic bronchoscopy. If the tube is not placed properly, fiberoptic bronchoscopy is used to correct the position. Time is recorded continuously for each participant using a stopwatch. In cases requiring multiple intubation attempts, cumulative time across all attempts is recorded. Cases requiring activation of the difficult airway algorithm after three failed attempts are classified as intubation failure and analyzed separately.
Intraoperative (from cessation of mask ventilation to appearance of the first complete end-tidal CO2 waveform confirming successful DLT placement, assessed immediately after intubation)
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Glottic visualization quality - POGO score
Intraoperative (assessed immediately upon laryngoscope insertion)
Glottic visualization quality - Cormack-Lehane grade
Intraoperative (assessed immediately upon laryngoscope insertion)
Intubation difficulty - Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS)
Intraoperative (assessed immediately after intubation)
Number of intubation attempts
Intraoperative (recorded during the intubation procedure)
Rate of need for auxiliary maneuvers
Intraoperative (recorded during the intubation procedure)
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Hyper-angulated blade C-MAC videolaryngoscopy
EXPERIMENTALHCMAC: DLT intubation performed using the Storz C-MAC hyperangulated D-blade videolaryngoscope. The D-blade provides an acutely angled geometry and transmits a high-resolution glottic image to an external monitor. The DLT stylet is shaped to match the hyperangulated blade curvature prior to intubation. Glottic view, intubation time, number of attempts, auxiliary maneuvers, and intubation-related complications are recorded. Correct tube placement is confirmed by fiberoptic bronchoscopy.
Macintosh-type blade C-MAC videolaryngoscopy
EXPERIMENTALMCMAC: DLT intubation performed using the Storz C-MAC Macintosh blade videolaryngoscope. The Macintosh geometry blade allows both direct and indirect (video-assisted) laryngoscopy and preserves standard hand mechanics familiar to the operator. The DLT stylet is shaped to match the Macintosh blade curvature prior to intubation. Glottic view, intubation time, number of attempts, auxiliary maneuvers, and intubation-related complications are recorded. Correct tube placement is confirmed by fiberoptic bronchoscopy.
Direct laryngoscopy
ACTIVE COMPARATORDL: DLT intubation performed using a standard direct Macintosh laryngoscope without video assistance. This arm serves as the active comparator representing current standard clinical practice for DLT intubation in thoracic surgery. The DLT stylet is shaped to match the Macintosh blade curvature prior to intubation. Glottic view, intubation time, number of attempts, auxiliary maneuvers, and intubation-related complications are recorded. Correct tube placement is confirmed by fiberoptic bronchoscopy.
Interventions
Double-lumen endotracheal tube intubation performed using the Storz C-MAC hyperangulated D-blade videolaryngoscope. The D-blade provides an acutely angled viewing geometry with high-resolution video transmission to an external monitor. The DLT stylet is shaped to match the D-blade curvature prior to intubation. All devices are CE-marked and used in accordance with the manufacturer's intended purpose.
Double-lumen endotracheal tube intubation performed using the Storz C-MAC Macintosh blade videolaryngoscope. The Macintosh geometry blade enables both direct and video-assisted laryngoscopy while preserving standard hand mechanics. The DLT stylet is shaped to match the Macintosh blade curvature prior to intubation. All devices are CE-marked and used in accordance with the manufacturer's intended purpose.
Double-lumen endotracheal tube intubation performed using a standard direct Macintosh laryngoscope without video assistance. This represents current standard clinical practice for DLT intubation in thoracic surgery and serves as the active comparator. The DLT stylet is shaped to match the Macintosh blade curvature prior to intubation. All devices are CE-marked and used in accordance with the manufacturer's intended purpose.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18 years or older
- Written informed consent obtained prior to surgery
- ASA physical status class I, II, or III
- Scheduled for elective thoracic surgery requiring one-lung ventilation and double-lumen endobronchial intubation
You may not qualify if:
- Age under 18 years
- Refusal or inability to provide informed consent
- ASA physical status class IV or above
- Emergency surgery
- Anticipated difficult airway, defined by any of the following: Mallampati score 4, thyromental distance less than 6.5 cm, restricted mouth opening, or BMI greater than 30 kg/m²
- History of upper airway surgery
- Significant upper airway obstruction or stridor
- Pregnancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Links
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 11, 2026
First Posted
May 29, 2026
Study Start
May 15, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
November 15, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
January 15, 2029
Last Updated
May 29, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-05