High-Flow Nasal Catheter (HFNC) Compared With Conventional Oxygenation
1 other identifier
interventional
90
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study, is to clarify whether there is benefit from the perioperative use of HFNC in thoracic surgeries, from intubation to the postoperative period, evaluating hipoxemia during orotracheal intubation, immediate complications after intubation, mortality and in-hospital complications.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 29, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 20, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 28, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2024
CompletedAugust 1, 2023
July 1, 2023
1 year
May 29, 2023
July 28, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Pulmonary Complications
To evaluate the incidence of in-hospital pulmonary complications in 30 days in patients submitted to the use of HFNC in the perioperative period of patients undergoing thoracic surgery, when compared to the use of conventional oxygen therapy. extubation
30 days
Mortality
To evaluate in-hospital postoperative mortality within 30 days.
30 days
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Incidence of hipoxemia
5 minuts
Complications after intubation and extubation
5 minuts
Study Arms (2)
HFNC
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe intervention group will receive HFNC therapy at induction of anesthesia. The intervention group will receive oxygen by 100% HFNC with a flow of 40 L.min-1 being increased to 70 L.min-1 during the period of apnea. A rapid sequence of orotracheal intubation will be performed, considering the time of apnea the moment of disappearance of the capnography line until the first ventilation after tube placement.
Convencional oxygen therapy
NO INTERVENTIONControl group will receive conventional oxygen therapy by mask facial, with 100% oxygen and flow of 10 L.min-1.After surgery, patients who are extubated in the operating room or in theintensive care unit, will remain in the control and intervention groups and will receive therapy for conventional oxygen or HFNC, respectively.
Interventions
The purpose of this intervention is clarify the benefit with the perioperative use of HFNC, in thoracic surgeries, from intubation to the postoperative period, evaluating mortality and in-hospital complications. is to clarify whether there is benefit from the perioperative use of HFNC, in thoracic surgeries, from intubation to the postoperative period, evaluating mortality and in-hospital complications.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All patients over 18 years of age who will undergo elective thoracic surgery and who have an ARISCAT score \> 26.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who need urgent/emergency surgery, pregnant women, who do not have an ARISCAT score \> 26 and those who refuse to participate in the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Desejo Tarso Maioli
Bento Gonçalves, Rio Grande do Sul, 95700348, Brazil
Related Publications (24)
Nepogodiev D, Martin J, Biccard B, Makupe A, Bhangu A; National Institute for Health Research Global Health Research Unit on Global Surgery. Global burden of postoperative death. Lancet. 2019 Feb 2;393(10170):401. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)33139-8. No abstract available.
PMID: 30722955BACKGROUNDAhmad T, Bouwman RA, Grigoras I, Aldecoa C, Hofer C, Hoeft A, Holt P, Fleisher LA, Buhre W, Pearse RM; International Surgical Outcomes Study (ISOS) group. Use of failure-to-rescue to identify international variation in postoperative care in low-, middle- and high-income countries: a 7-day cohort study of elective surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2017 Aug 1;119(2):258-266. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex185.
PMID: 28854536BACKGROUNDSerpa Neto A, Hemmes SN, Barbas CS, Beiderlinden M, Fernandez-Bustamante A, Futier E, Hollmann MW, Jaber S, Kozian A, Licker M, Lin WQ, Moine P, Scavonetto F, Schilling T, Selmo G, Severgnini P, Sprung J, Treschan T, Unzueta C, Weingarten TN, Wolthuis EK, Wrigge H, Gama de Abreu M, Pelosi P, Schultz MJ; PROVE Network investigators. Incidence of mortality and morbidity related to postoperative lung injury in patients who have undergone abdominal or thoracic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Respir Med. 2014 Dec;2(12):1007-15. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70228-0. Epub 2014 Nov 13.
PMID: 25466352BACKGROUNDCanet J, Gallart L, Gomar C, Paluzie G, Valles J, Castillo J, Sabate S, Mazo V, Briones Z, Sanchis J; ARISCAT Group. Prediction of postoperative pulmonary complications in a population-based surgical cohort. Anesthesiology. 2010 Dec;113(6):1338-50. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181fc6e0a.
PMID: 21045639BACKGROUNDArozullah AM, Daley J, Henderson WG, Khuri SF. Multifactorial risk index for predicting postoperative respiratory failure in men after major noncardiac surgery. The National Veterans Administration Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg. 2000 Aug;232(2):242-53. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200008000-00015.
PMID: 10903604BACKGROUNDMeara JG, Leather AJ, Hagander L, Alkire BC, Alonso N, Ameh EA, Bickler SW, Conteh L, Dare AJ, Davies J, Merisier ED, El-Halabi S, Farmer PE, Gawande A, Gillies R, Greenberg SL, Grimes CE, Gruen RL, Ismail EA, Kamara TB, Lavy C, Lundeg G, Mkandawire NC, Raykar NP, Riesel JN, Rodas E, Rose J, Roy N, Shrime MG, Sullivan R, Verguet S, Watters D, Weiser TG, Wilson IH, Yamey G, Yip W. Global Surgery 2030: evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2016 Feb;25:75-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2015.09.006. Epub 2015 Sep 30. No abstract available.
PMID: 26597405BACKGROUNDWittenstein J, Ball L, Pelosi P, Gama de Abreu M. High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy in patients undergoing thoracic surgery: current evidence and practice. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2019 Feb;32(1):44-49. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000682.
PMID: 30543553BACKGROUNDPapazian L, Corley A, Hess D, Fraser JF, Frat JP, Guitton C, Jaber S, Maggiore SM, Nava S, Rello J, Ricard JD, Stephan F, Trisolini R, Azoulay E. Use of high-flow nasal cannula oxygenation in ICU adults: a narrative review. Intensive Care Med. 2016 Sep;42(9):1336-49. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4277-8. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
PMID: 26969671BACKGROUNDSpence EA, Rajaleelan W, Wong J, Chung F, Wong DT. The Effectiveness of High-Flow Nasal Oxygen During the Intraoperative Period: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2020 Oct;131(4):1102-1110. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005073.
PMID: 32925331BACKGROUNDLodenius A, Piehl J, Ostlund A, Ullman J, Jonsson Fagerlund M. Transnasal humidified rapid-insufflation ventilatory exchange (THRIVE) vs. facemask breathing pre-oxygenation for rapid sequence induction in adults: a prospective randomised non-blinded clinical trial. Anaesthesia. 2018 May;73(5):564-571. doi: 10.1111/anae.14215. Epub 2018 Jan 13.
PMID: 29330853BACKGROUNDPennisi MA, Bello G, Congedo MT, Montini L, Nachira D, Ferretti GM, Meacci E, Gualtieri E, De Pascale G, Grieco DL, Margaritora S, Antonelli M. Early nasal high-flow versus Venturi mask oxygen therapy after lung resection: a randomized trial. Crit Care. 2019 Feb 28;23(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2361-5.
PMID: 30819227BACKGROUNDBrainard J, Scott BK, Sullivan BL, Fernandez-Bustamante A, Piccoli JR, Gebbink MG, Bartels K. Heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula oxygen after thoracic surgery - A randomized prospective clinical pilot trial. J Crit Care. 2017 Aug;40:225-228. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.04.023. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
PMID: 28454060BACKGROUNDYu Y, Qian X, Liu C, Zhu C. Effect of High-Flow Nasal Cannula versus Conventional Oxygen Therapy for Patients with Thoracoscopic Lobectomy after Extubation. Can Respir J. 2017;2017:7894631. doi: 10.1155/2017/7894631. Epub 2017 Feb 19.
PMID: 28298878BACKGROUNDFraser JF, Spooner AJ, Dunster KR, Anstey CM, Corley A. Nasal high flow oxygen therapy in patients with COPD reduces respiratory rate and tissue carbon dioxide while increasing tidal and end-expiratory lung volumes: a randomised crossover trial. Thorax. 2016 Aug;71(8):759-61. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-207962. Epub 2016 Mar 25.
PMID: 27015801BACKGROUNDSklar MC, Dres M, Rittayamai N, West B, Grieco DL, Telias I, Junhasavasdikul D, Rauseo M, Pham T, Madotto F, Campbell C, Tullis E, Brochard L. High-flow nasal oxygen versus noninvasive ventilation in adult patients with cystic fibrosis: a randomized crossover physiological study. Ann Intensive Care. 2018 Sep 5;8(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s13613-018-0432-4.
PMID: 30187270BACKGROUNDVourc'h M, Nicolet J, Volteau C, Caubert L, Chabbert C, Lepoivre T, Senage T, Roussel JC, Rozec B. High-Flow Therapy by Nasal Cannulae Versus High-Flow Face Mask in Severe Hypoxemia After Cardiac Surgery: A Single-Center Randomized Controlled Study-The HEART FLOW Study. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2020 Jan;34(1):157-165. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2019.05.039. Epub 2019 May 29.
PMID: 31230964BACKGROUNDStephan F, Barrucand B, Petit P, Rezaiguia-Delclaux S, Medard A, Delannoy B, Cosserant B, Flicoteaux G, Imbert A, Pilorge C, Berard L; BiPOP Study Group. High-Flow Nasal Oxygen vs Noninvasive Positive Airway Pressure in Hypoxemic Patients After Cardiothoracic Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2015 Jun 16;313(23):2331-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.5213.
PMID: 25980660BACKGROUNDWu X, Cao W, Zhang B, Wang S. Effect of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy vs conventional oxygen therapy on adult postcardiothoracic operation: A meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Oct;97(41):e12783. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012783.
PMID: 30313100BACKGROUNDZochios V, Collier T, Blaudszun G, Butchart A, Earwaker M, Jones N, Klein AA. The effect of high-flow nasal oxygen on hospital length of stay in cardiac surgical patients at high risk for respiratory complications: a randomised controlled trial. Anaesthesia. 2018 Dec;73(12):1478-1488. doi: 10.1111/anae.14345. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
PMID: 30019747BACKGROUNDRochwerg B, Granton D, Wang DX, Helviz Y, Einav S, Frat JP, Mekontso-Dessap A, Schreiber A, Azoulay E, Mercat A, Demoule A, Lemiale V, Pesenti A, Riviello ED, Mauri T, Mancebo J, Brochard L, Burns K. High flow nasal cannula compared with conventional oxygen therapy for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2019 May;45(5):563-572. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05590-5. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
PMID: 30888444BACKGROUNDNi YN, Luo J, Yu H, Liu D, Liang BM, Yao R, Liang ZA. Can high-flow nasal cannula reduce the rate of reintubation in adult patients after extubation? A meta-analysis. BMC Pulm Med. 2017 Nov 17;17(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12890-017-0491-6.
PMID: 29149868BACKGROUNDHernandez G, Vaquero C, Gonzalez P, Subira C, Frutos-Vivar F, Rialp G, Laborda C, Colinas L, Cuena R, Fernandez R. Effect of Postextubation High-Flow Nasal Cannula vs Conventional Oxygen Therapy on Reintubation in Low-Risk Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2016 Apr 5;315(13):1354-61. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.2711.
PMID: 26975498BACKGROUNDHernandez G, Vaquero C, Colinas L, Cuena R, Gonzalez P, Canabal A, Sanchez S, Rodriguez ML, Villasclaras A, Fernandez R. Effect of Postextubation High-Flow Nasal Cannula vs Noninvasive Ventilation on Reintubation and Postextubation Respiratory Failure in High-Risk Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2016 Oct 18;316(15):1565-1574. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.14194.
PMID: 27706464BACKGROUNDCortegiani A, Accurso G, Mercadante S, Giarratano A, Gregoretti C. High flow nasal therapy in perioperative medicine: from operating room to general ward. BMC Anesthesiol. 2018 Nov 10;18(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s12871-018-0623-4.
PMID: 30414608BACKGROUND
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 29, 2023
First Posted
June 20, 2023
Study Start
July 28, 2023
Primary Completion
July 30, 2024
Study Completion
December 30, 2024
Last Updated
August 1, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share