Different Drilling Techniques in Posterior Maxilla

NCT07606456 | Completed

• 1 other identifier: A0101025OS
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 32
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

The study aimed to evaluate clinically and radiographically the effect of Magnetic Mallet technique versus Conventional Drilling technique on early loaded implant in posterior maxilla.

Conditions

Implant Dentistry; Implant Loading; Osteotomy Protocols

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

• Implant stability

  The analysis of resonance frequency analysis (RFA) w made using an Osstell Mentor apparatus

  9 months

• Bone Density measurement

  Relative bone density records will be collected from the bucco-palatal view of the cross sectional plane using the Hounsfield unit

  9 months

• Marginal Bone Loss (MBL)

  For the calculation of marginal bone loss (MBL), the implant was used as a reference

  9 months

Study Arms (2)

Magnetic Mallet Group

EXPERIMENTAL

osteotomy site preparation using magnetic mallet

Procedure: Magnetic Mallet Technique

Conventional Drilling Group

EXPERIMENTAL

osteotomy site preparation using conventional drilling technique

Procedure: Conventional Drilling Technique

Interventions

Magnetic Mallet Technique PROCEDURE

Osteotomy preparation for dental implant placement using a magneto-dynamic device (Magnetic Mallet) that delivers controlled percussive forces to condense bone and prepare the implant site in the posterior maxilla. Implants will be placed and early loaded after 2 months.

Magnetic Mallet Group

Conventional Drilling Technique PROCEDURE

Osteotomy preparation for dental implant placement using traditional drilling technique in bone and prepare the implant site in the posterior maxilla. Implants will be placed and early loaded after 2 months.

Conventional Drilling Group

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 18 Years - 50 Years
• Sex: female
• Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

• Patient with missing one or more posterior maxillary teeth.
• Patients in the age group between 18 and 50 years old.
• mm or more vertical bone height is present.
• No gender preface in selection of the patients.
• Good oral hygiene.
• Non-smokers.
• Patients willing to be present during the study follow up intervals.
• Patients free from any systemic diseases.
• mm or more ridge width is present.
• Crown height space of at least 8 mm. •!Patients without any para-functional habits (bruxism and clenching).

You may not qualify if:

• Patients with any pathological lesion or root tips at the planned surgical site.
• Patients with systemic diseases that contra-indicate the surgical procedure or affect bone healing process such as uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, bleeding disorders.
• serious osseous disorders, and mental disorders.
• Patient taking drugs that could affect bone healing process as in
• Immunosuppressive drugs and bisphosphonates.
• Alcoholism.
• Untreated periodontal disease or bad oral hygiene.
• Pregnancy.

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Mansoura University: lead

Study Sites (1)

Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University

Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate, 35516, Egypt

Location

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: TRIPLE
• Who Masked: PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
• Purpose: TREATMENT
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: May 19, 2026
• First Posted: May 26, 2026
• Study Start: May 1, 2025
• Primary Completion: May 1, 2026
• Study Completion: May 1, 2026
• Last Updated: May 27, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-05

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will not share

Locations

EG (1)