NCT07294820

Brief Summary

Study hypothesis The hypothesis is that a full-digital workflow for immediate implant placement with immediate restoration is able to provide at least the same outcomes as standard analog implant placement in the same clinical scenario (immediate placement with immediate loading), in terms of implant success and survival and marginal bone level stability. A VAS scale evaluation will be created to measure patients' aesthetic and overall satisfaction, as well the duration of the procedure will be measured. Type of study Clinical Study design Prospective, single-arm using BLC implants with full digital workflow. Patients treated within "Clinical and radiological evaluation of a novel implant design (Straumann BLX) in the esthetic zone: a prospective case series study" (IIS 43/17), published as "Cardaropoli D, Tamagnone L, Roffredo A, Demaria A. Clinical and radiological evaluation of a fully tapered implant with immediate placement in the aesthetic zone: a prospective case series study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2022 Sep-Oct;42(5):631-637" will be used for comparison. Study power N total: 24 Anticipated drop-out rate %: 15 Adequate power analysis and justification A power calculation before the study revealed that a sample size of 20 was necessary to detect a difference of 0.5 mm in the vertical position of the implant between planning and execution of 0.5 mm assuming a maximal standard deviation of 0.7 mm using a paired t test with 80% power and .05 level of significance. Study intervention - test arm Study Device BLC Implant Test treatment name Fully digital immediate placement/immediate restoration Test Treatment description An immediate BLC implant inserted in post-extraction sites in the upper maxilla, from 15 to 25, with immediate restoration. Primary outcome parameter Pink Esthetic Score (PES from 0 to 14), at 1 year Marginal Bone Level expressed in mm, at 1 year Secondary outcome parameter PROMS - Patients' satisfaction using VAS scale, at day of surgery and at 1 year Duration of the procedure, at day of surgery Probing Depth (PD) and Bleeding on Probing (BoP) at 1 year Materials and Methods Population and indication 24 adult systemically healthy patients requiring tooth extraction and single implant tooth replacement, from 1.5 to 2.5 Treatments In the case study phase, a 3D cone-beam radiograph and an intraoral scan are acquired. A computer guided surgical stent is produced from the virtual planning. By sharing the virtual planning, the laboratory designs and produces a temporary crown. On the day of surgery the tooth is extracted, the implant is inserted and the temporary is delivered. The final ceramic crown is delivered 3 months later. Follow-up will end 1 year after implant placement.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
24

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
26mo left

Started Jan 2026

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress12%
Jan 2026Jun 2028

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 7, 2025

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 19, 2025

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 27, 2026

Completed
2.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2028

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2028

Last Updated

January 9, 2026

Status Verified

December 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2.3 years

First QC Date

December 7, 2025

Last Update Submit

January 8, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

oral implant placementcomputer guided surgeryImmediata implant placement

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Pink Esthetic Score

    1 year

  • Marginal Bone Level

    1 year

Interventions

fully guided implant placement with a computer guided surgical stant

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

24 adults systemically healthy patient requiring tooth extraction and single implant tooth replacement, from 1.5 to 2.5

You may qualify if:

  • adult systemically healthy patient requiring tooth extraction and single implant tooth replacement, from 1.5 to 2.5

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Studio Dottor Cardaropoli

Turin, Piedmont, 10129, Italy

RECRUITING

Related Publications (1)

  • Cardaropoli D, Tamagnone L, Roffredo A, De Maria A. Clinical and Radiologic Evaluation of a Fully Tapered Implant with Immediate Placement in the Esthetic Zone: A Prospective Case Series Study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2022 Sep-Oct;42(5):631-637. doi: 10.11607/prd.5682.

    PMID: 36044694BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Mutagenesis, Insertional

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Protein EngineeringGenetic EngineeringGenetic TechniquesInvestigative TechniquesMutationGenetic VariationGenetic PhenomenaMutagenesis

Central Study Contacts

Daniele Franco Cardaropoli, dds

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE ONLY
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Prof Dr

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 7, 2025

First Posted

December 19, 2025

Study Start

January 27, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2028

Last Updated

January 9, 2026

Record last verified: 2025-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations