NCT07234214

Brief Summary

This clinical trial is studying different methods of preparing bone for dental implants. When a tooth is missing, a small titanium screw called a dental implant can be placed in the jaw to replace it. The stability of the implant during the first weeks after surgery is very important for long-term success. In this study, 100 patients each received a single dental implant. They were randomly assigned to one of five surgical methods: drilling at 50, 300, or 800 revolutions per minute (rpm), bone densification using special burs, or bone condensation using condenser drills. The goal was to compare how these techniques affect implant stability, measured by insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis, as well as the patient's anxiety before and after surgery. This research aims to find which technique provides the best balance between bone healing and patient comfort. All participants were healthy adults, and the study was approved by the institutional ethics committee.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2019

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2019

Completed
3.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2023

Completed
2.5 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 14, 2025

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 18, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

November 18, 2025

Status Verified

November 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

3.7 years

First QC Date

November 14, 2025

Last Update Submit

November 14, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Dental implantsOsteotomy protocolsImplant stabilityInsertion torqueResonance frequency analysisOsseodensificationBone condensationPatient anxiety

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Insertion Torque at Implant Placement

    Maximum insertion torque (Ncm) recorded at implant placement using a calibrated surgical motor and confirmed with a manual torque wrench when needed.

    At the time of implant placement.

  • Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ)

    Implant stability measured by resonance frequency analysis (RFA) using the Osstell Mentor™ device. Mean of buccolingual and mesiodistal measurements recorded.

    At baseline, 1 week, 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months after implant placement.

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Change in Patient-Reported Anxiety (VAS)

    Preoperative (within 30 minutes before surgery) and immediate postoperative (within 30 minutes after surgery).

  • Procedure-Related Adverse Events

    From surgery to 3 months.

Study Arms (5)

50 rpm - Ultra-low-speed drilling

EXPERIMENTAL

Sequential osteotomy drilling at 50 rpm without irrigation, followed by implant placement.

Procedure: Osteotomy technique - 50 Rpm

300 rpm - Moderate-speed drilling

EXPERIMENTAL

Sequential osteotomy drilling at 300 rpm with external irrigation, followed by implant placement.

Procedure: Osteotomy technique - 300 Rpm

800 Rpm - High-speed drilling

EXPERIMENTAL

Sequential osteotomy drilling at 800 rpm with external irrigation, followed by implant placement.

Procedure: Osteotomy technique - 800 Rpm

DNS - Osseodensification

EXPERIMENTAL

Osteotomy prepared with Densah® burs (Versah, USA) at 1200 rpm counterclockwise with irrigation, following pilot drilling.

Procedure: Osteotomy technique - DNS (Osseodensification)

CDS - Bone condensation

EXPERIMENTAL

Osteotomy prepared with condenser drills (Surgident, South Korea) at 50 rpm clockwise without irrigation, following pilot drilling at 800 rpm.

Procedure: Osteotomy technique - CDS (Bone Condensation)

Interventions

Ultra-low-speed sequential drilling at 50 rpm without irrigation.

50 rpm - Ultra-low-speed drilling

Moderate-speed sequential drilling at 300 rpm with irrigation.

300 rpm - Moderate-speed drilling

High-speed sequential drilling at 800 rpm with irrigation.

800 Rpm - High-speed drilling

Osseodensification using Densah® burs at 1200 rpm counterclockwise with irrigation.

DNS - Osseodensification

Bone condensation with condenser drills at 50 rpm clockwise without irrigation.

CDS - Bone condensation

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years - 78 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adults aged 20-78 years
  • Single-tooth healed edentulous ridge
  • First-time implant candidates
  • Preoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) available
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status I
  • Non-smokers or light smokers (\<10 cigarettes/day)
  • Provided written informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Previous grafting or sinus augmentation at the implant site, including socket grafting after extraction
  • Systemic contraindications to implant surgery
  • Intraoperative complications or postoperative infections
  • Missing insertion torque (IT) or ISQ data
  • Requirement for a submerged (two-stage) protocol
  • Deviations from the standardized surgical protocol or implant system

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Istanbul Aydın University, Faculty of Dentistry

Istanbul, 34295, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The surgeon could not be blinded due to the nature of the interventions. However, implant stability was measured by an independent assessor, and statistical analyses were performed by a blinded biostatistician.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: A randomized, controlled, parallel-group clinical trial comparing five different implant osteotomy techniques with respect to insertion torque, implant stability, and patient-reported anxiety.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 14, 2025

First Posted

November 18, 2025

Study Start

September 1, 2019

Primary Completion

May 1, 2023

Study Completion

May 1, 2023

Last Updated

November 18, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations