Social Attention in ASD and TD Children
Dynamic Gaze Strategies in ASD Children During Social Interactions: An Eye-Tracking Investigation Under Intention-Congruent and -Incongruent Conditions
1 other identifier
observational
66
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To examine whether the spatiotemporal organization of gaze strategies differs between children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and typically developing (TD) children during a staged joint attention interaction, and to identify at which phase differences emerge.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Jul 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 22, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 27, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 27, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 6, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 13, 2026
CompletedMay 13, 2026
May 1, 2026
1.7 years
May 6, 2026
May 6, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Percentage of Total Fixation Duration on Human Faces during Entire Video
Percentage of total fixation duration on human faces was calculated as (total fixation duration on all face areas of interest / total fixation duration on the entire video) × 100. Fixation was defined as gaze maintained within a 1° visual angle for a minimum of 100 ms. This measure was compared between the ASD and TD groups.
During the full 27-second video presentation
Total Fixation Duration on Human Faces during Entire Video
Total fixation duration (in milliseconds) on human faces, calculated as the sum of all fixation durations that fell within face areas of interest (AOIs). This measure was compared between the ASD and TD groups.
During the full 27-second video presentation
Percentage of Total Fixation Duration on Human Faces During Phase 4 (Emotional Feedback) by Condition
Percentage of fixation duration on faces was calculated for the emotional feedback phase separately for Preference-congruent and Preference-incongruent trials. The interaction between Group (ASD vs. TD) and Condition (Congruent vs. Incongruent) was examined. Higher percentages indicate greater allocation of visual attention to faces during emotional feedback.
During seconds 22-27 of the video
Total Scanpath Length During Entire Video
During the full 27-second video presentation
Number of Gaze Shifts Between Face and Object Areas of Interest
The number of saccadic gaze shifts that cross between pre-defined face and object areas of interest (AOIs) was counted. This was taken as an index of attentional switching between social and non-social information.
During the full 27-second video presentation
Mean Distance of Fixation Points from the Center of the Face Area of Interest
For each fixation, the Euclidean distance (in degrees of visual angle) from its location to the centroid of the pre-defined face AOI was calculated. The mean of these distances across all fixations was then computed. Larger values indicate that gaze tended to fall farther from the faces, reflecting less attention to facial information.
During the full 27-second video presentation
Study Arms (2)
Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) Group
Typically Developing (TD) Group
Eligibility Criteria
Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and typically developing (TD) peers. ASD participants were recruited from a institution in Chengdu, China; TD participants were recruited from a local kindergarten. The sample covers an age range of approximately 2 to 10 years and includes both males and females, all of whom completed an eye-tracking free-viewing task of social interaction videos.
You may qualify if:
- \- For ASD group: confirmed clinical diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder. For TD group: Typically developing children without any developmental or neurological disorders.
- Both groups: Normal or corrected-to-normal vision, no color vision deficiencies, and legal guardian provided written informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- \- Failure to meet the study's group-specific screening cutoffs on the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) and Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ) Known genetic syndromes, significant hearing loss, or uncorrectable visual impairment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
School of Foreign Languages, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
Chengdu, Sichuan, 611731, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 6, 2026
First Posted
May 13, 2026
Study Start
July 22, 2024
Primary Completion
March 27, 2026
Study Completion
March 27, 2026
Last Updated
May 13, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-05