NCT07583615

Brief Summary

To examine whether the spatiotemporal organization of gaze strategies differs between children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and typically developing (TD) children during a staged joint attention interaction, and to identify at which phase differences emerge.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
66

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2024

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 22, 2024

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 27, 2026

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 27, 2026

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 6, 2026

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 13, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

May 13, 2026

Status Verified

May 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1.7 years

First QC Date

May 6, 2026

Last Update Submit

May 6, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Autism spectrum disorderJoint attentionEye tracking

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Percentage of Total Fixation Duration on Human Faces during Entire Video

    Percentage of total fixation duration on human faces was calculated as (total fixation duration on all face areas of interest / total fixation duration on the entire video) × 100. Fixation was defined as gaze maintained within a 1° visual angle for a minimum of 100 ms. This measure was compared between the ASD and TD groups.

    During the full 27-second video presentation

  • Total Fixation Duration on Human Faces during Entire Video

    Total fixation duration (in milliseconds) on human faces, calculated as the sum of all fixation durations that fell within face areas of interest (AOIs). This measure was compared between the ASD and TD groups.

    During the full 27-second video presentation

  • Percentage of Total Fixation Duration on Human Faces During Phase 4 (Emotional Feedback) by Condition

    Percentage of fixation duration on faces was calculated for the emotional feedback phase separately for Preference-congruent and Preference-incongruent trials. The interaction between Group (ASD vs. TD) and Condition (Congruent vs. Incongruent) was examined. Higher percentages indicate greater allocation of visual attention to faces during emotional feedback.

    During seconds 22-27 of the video

  • Total Scanpath Length During Entire Video

    During the full 27-second video presentation

  • Number of Gaze Shifts Between Face and Object Areas of Interest

    The number of saccadic gaze shifts that cross between pre-defined face and object areas of interest (AOIs) was counted. This was taken as an index of attentional switching between social and non-social information.

    During the full 27-second video presentation

  • Mean Distance of Fixation Points from the Center of the Face Area of Interest

    For each fixation, the Euclidean distance (in degrees of visual angle) from its location to the centroid of the pre-defined face AOI was calculated. The mean of these distances across all fixations was then computed. Larger values indicate that gaze tended to fall farther from the faces, reflecting less attention to facial information.

    During the full 27-second video presentation

Study Arms (2)

Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) Group

Typically Developing (TD) Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age3 Years - 11 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and typically developing (TD) peers. ASD participants were recruited from a institution in Chengdu, China; TD participants were recruited from a local kindergarten. The sample covers an age range of approximately 2 to 10 years and includes both males and females, all of whom completed an eye-tracking free-viewing task of social interaction videos.

You may qualify if:

  • \- For ASD group: confirmed clinical diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder. For TD group: Typically developing children without any developmental or neurological disorders.
  • Both groups: Normal or corrected-to-normal vision, no color vision deficiencies, and legal guardian provided written informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • \- Failure to meet the study's group-specific screening cutoffs on the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) and Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ) Known genetic syndromes, significant hearing loss, or uncorrectable visual impairment

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

School of Foreign Languages, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China

Chengdu, Sichuan, 611731, China

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Autism Spectrum Disorder

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Child Development Disorders, PervasiveNeurodevelopmental DisordersMental Disorders

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
CROSS SECTIONAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 6, 2026

First Posted

May 13, 2026

Study Start

July 22, 2024

Primary Completion

March 27, 2026

Study Completion

March 27, 2026

Last Updated

May 13, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-05

Locations