NCT07582107

Brief Summary

This study looks at how to place port catheters safely and accurately in children who need long-term intravenous treatment. For these treatments to work well and to avoid problems such as heart rhythm issues, blood clots, or infections, the tip of the catheter must be in the correct position inside a large vein near the heart. Doctors commonly use two different methods to estimate the correct catheter length. One method uses body measurements and surface landmarks on the chest. The other method, called intracavitary electrocardiography (IC-ECG), uses changes in the heart's electrical signal during the procedure to guide placement. In this study, researchers compared these two methods in children. They measured how closely the results of the two techniques matched and how much they differed. After the catheter was placed, chest X-rays were used to check whether the catheter tip was in the correct position. The goal of this study is to determine whether the simpler anatomical method can provide accurate and clinically reliable results compared to the IC-ECG method.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
53

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2024

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2024

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 30, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 30, 2025

Completed
1 year until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 6, 2026

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 12, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

May 12, 2026

Status Verified

May 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

May 6, 2026

Last Update Submit

May 6, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Agreement between anatomical landmark method and intracavitary electrocardiography for catheter length determination

    Assessment of the agreement between catheter length measurements obtained using the anatomical landmark method and intracavitary electrocardiography in pediatric patients undergoing port catheter placement. Measurements obtained by both methods were recorded in the same participants, and the difference between the two techniques was analyzed to evaluate consistency and agreement.

    During the procedure

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Radiographic accuracy of catheter tip position using the anatomical landmark method

    Within 1 day after the procedure

Study Arms (1)

Pediatric patients undergoing port catheter placement

Children undergoing port catheter placement in whom catheter length was assessed using both the anatomical landmark method and intracavitary electrocardiography (IC-ECG) within the same procedure.

Procedure: Anatomical Landmark MethodProcedure: Intracavitary Electrocardiography (IC-ECG)

Interventions

For each patient, two catheter length measurements were obtained: one using anatomical landmarks and one using intracavitary electrocardiography. Although both measurements were recorded for comparison, the catheter was trimmed and placed according to the anatomical landmark method. Intracavitary electrocardiography is a safe and cost-effective method that allows real-time confirmation of catheter tip position. In this study, a modified approach was created using standard anesthesia monitors. After venous access was established, the proximal end of the sterile guidewire was connected to an electrocardiogram electrode placed on the right shoulder. As the guidewire was advanced, changes in the cardiac P-wave were monitored continuously. The point of maximum P-wave amplitude, corresponding to the junction of the superior vena cava and the right atrium, was identified, and the corresponding intravascular length was recorded.

Pediatric patients undergoing port catheter placement

Port catheter placement procedures were performed under ultrasound guidance. To ensure correct positioning of the catheter tip, a length estimation method based on anatomical landmarks was used. This method was developed by reviewing contrast-enhanced chest computed tomography images of pediatric patients without thoracic deformities. In these images, the ideal catheter tip position was identified just above the junction of the superior vena cava and the right atrium. When this point was projected onto the chest wall, it most often corresponded to the upper border of the junction between the right third rib and the sternum. In clinical practice, the distance between the vascular puncture site and this anatomical landmark was measured on the skin using a ruler, and the catheter length was adjusted accordingly before placement.

Pediatric patients undergoing port catheter placement

Eligibility Criteria

Age1 Month - 17 Years
Sexall
Age GroupsChild (0-17)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Pediatric participants aged between 1 month and 17 years who underwent elective port catheter placement at a tertiary care center. All procedures were performed under standardized conditions, and participants were evaluated using both anatomical landmark-based measurements and intracavitary electrocardiography during the same procedure.

You may qualify if:

  • Pediatric participants aged between 1 month and 17 years scheduled for elective port catheter placement

You may not qualify if:

  • Participants with central venous anatomical variations or anomalies (such as persistent left superior vena cava or double superior vena cava)
  • Participants with thrombosis in the target veins
  • Participants with skeletal abnormalities, including anterior chest wall deformities or scoliosis
  • Participants for whom parental consent could not be obtained

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Ankara City Hospital Bilkent

Ankara, ÇANKAYA, 06800, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Study Officials

  • Çağrı Damar, Assoc Prof

    Ankara City Hospital Bilkent

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Target Duration
1 Day
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 6, 2026

First Posted

May 12, 2026

Study Start

November 1, 2024

Primary Completion

April 30, 2025

Study Completion

April 30, 2025

Last Updated

May 12, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-05

Locations