Comparison of Automated Control Anesthesia and Manual Control Anesthesia in Minimal Flow Anesthesia

NCT05554263 | Completed DMC

• 1 other identifier: Autocontrolled Anesthesia
• Study Type: observational
• Target: 80
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 2

Brief Summary

With the introduction of technology into our lives, we come across two different anesthesia management modules in anesthesia machines. The first of these is the traditional method, the manual controlled anesthesia technique; the other is the automatic controlled anesthesia technique. In our daily practice, both anesthesia techniques can be used in patients who have undergone general anesthesia. These two techniques can be used in both high-flow anesthesia and low-flow anesthesia applications.

Conditions

Anesthesia; Sevoflurane; Monitoring

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• ET-AA

  searching the time needed to reach the target end tidal anesthetic agent (ET-AA) concentration and the amount of anesthetic agent consumption

  10 minutes

Secondary Outcomes (1)

• target values

  4 hours

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 18 Years - 75 Years
• Gender Eligibility Details: Patients scheduled for elective gynecological oncology operation under general anesthesia will be included in the study.
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
• Sampling Method: Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients scheduled for elective gynecological operation under general anesthesia will be included in the study.

You may qualify if:

• Between 18-75 year-old
• ASA 1-3
• Will undergo gynecological operation
• Expected surgery time (\>1 hour)

You may not qualify if:

• ❖ BMI \>30
• Chronic opioid use
• Contraindication to any of the anesthetic agents to be used
• Neurological disorders
• Surgery lasting \<1 hour

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Sakarya University: lead

Study Sites (2)

Sakarya University Medicine Faculty Department of Anaesthesiaology and Reanimation

Sakarya, 54100, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Sakarya University Research and Training hospital

Sakarya, 54100, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (2)

• Tay S, Weinberg L, Peyton P, Story D, Briedis J. Financial and environmental costs of manual versus automated control of end-tidal gas concentrations. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2013 Jan;41(1):95-101. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1304100116.

  PMID: 23362897 RESULT

• Singaravelu S, Barclay P. Automated control of end-tidal inhalation anaesthetic concentration using the GE Aisys Carestation. Br J Anaesth. 2013 Apr;110(4):561-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/aes464. Epub 2013 Jan 4.

  PMID: 23293274 RESULT

Study Officials

• Rezan Şerefoğlu

  Sakarya University Research And Training hospital

  PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

• Study Type: observational
• Observational Model: COHORT
• Time Perspective: PROSPECTIVE
• Target Duration: 1 Day
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: Research assistant

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: September 21, 2022
• First Posted: September 26, 2022
• Study Start: September 1, 2022
• Primary Completion: September 1, 2022
• Study Completion: May 1, 2023
• Last Updated: August 25, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-08

Locations

TU (2)