NCT07362329

Brief Summary

This study will examine the effects of an upper-body resistance "exercise snack" (ES) protocol on upper-body strength, endurance, and power. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: a submaximal effort repeated throughout the exercise day ES group, a maximal effort performed once per exercise day ES group, and a control group that continues usual activity (Control: no resistance exercise). Both exercise groups will perform two exercises, push-ups and planks, three days per week. The submaximal repeated effort ES group (SMR\_ES) will perform approximately 33% of the maximal number of push-ups and maintain a plank position for 33% of maximal time, three times per day. The maximal once-per-day effort ES group (MO\_ES) will perform the maximal number of push-ups and maintain a plank position for maximal time, once per day. Therefore, both ES groups (SMR\_ES and MO\_ES) will perform the same weekly volume (repetitions and time) of both exercises across the six-week intervention period. Before and after the six-week intervention period, all participants will undergo testing to assess upper-body performance. Outcome measures will include push-up endurance (maximum repetitions), plank endurance (maximum time), push-up power (assessed using force plates), and maximal push strength (assessed using hand-held dynamometry). Pre- and post-intervention changes in outcomes will be compared among all three groups. If significant changes are identified, additional comparisons will be conducted between the SMR\_ES and Control groups, as well as between the SMR\_ES and MO\_ES groups. The primary aim of this study is to determine whether repeated submaximal efforts performed three times per day, three days per week, increase upper-body endurance, power, and strength compared to a control group performing no resistance exercise. The secondary aim is to determine whether submaximal efforts performed three times per day, three days per week, produce changes in upper-body strength, endurance, and power that are not different from maximal efforts performed once per day, three days per week. These aims address whether exercise distribution influences strength and power adaptations beyond total weekly volume. The findings may help inform time-efficient, lower subjective-effort resistance training strategies that can be implemented in educational, athletic, or general fitness settings.

Trial Health

55
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2026

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 6, 2026

Completed
17 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 23, 2026

Completed
9 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2026

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 24, 2026

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 25, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

April 9, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

January 6, 2026

Last Update Submit

April 6, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Exercise snacksresistance exerciseupper body fitness

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Maximal Upper Body Push Strength

    Upper-body muscular strength will be assessed using a hand-held dynamometer during a standardized pushing task. Participants will push a barbell upward against an immovable strap connected to a pull dynamometer. Peak force output (Newtons) will be recorded.

    Change from baseline after 6 weeks

  • Push-Up Endurance (Repetitions)

    Upper-body muscular endurance will be assessed by the maximum number of push-ups completed using standardized form criteria.

    Change from baseline after 6 weeks.

  • Plank Endurance (Seconds)

    Core and upper-body endurance will be assessed by the maximum duration (seconds) participants can maintain a standardized plank position.

    Change from baseline after 6 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Upper-Body Power - Peak Force (Newtons)

    Change from baseline after 6 weeks.

  • Upper-Body Power - Time to Task Completion (Seconds)

    Change from baseline after 6 weeks

Other Outcomes (3)

  • Upper-Body Power - Mean Force (Newtons)

    Observed over 6 weeks.

  • Participant Retention (%)

    Observed over 6 weeks

  • Protocol Adherence (%)

    Observed over 6 weeks

Study Arms (3)

A submaximal repeated effort exercise snack (SMR_ES)

EXPERIMENTAL

The SMR\_ES group will perform approximately 33% of their individual number of maximal push-up and maximal plank time, three times per day, three days per week.

Behavioral: Submaximal Repeated Exercise Snack

A maximal effort one-time exercise snack (MO_ES)

EXPERIMENTAL

The MO\_ES group will perform the maximal number of push-ups and hold a plank position for their maximal time, once per day, three days per week.

Behavioral: Maximal One-Time Exercise Snack

Control group

NO INTERVENTION

Continues usual activity with no upper body resistive exercise.

Interventions

Participants perform frequent, low-dose submaximal upper-body exercise snacks spread throughout the day. The SMR\_ES group will perform approximately 33% of their individual number of maximal push-up and maximal plank time, three times per day, three days per week.

A submaximal repeated effort exercise snack (SMR_ES)

Participants perform a single daily maximal-effort upper-body exercise snack. The MO\_ES group will perform the maximal number of push-ups and hold a plank position for their maximal time, once per day, three days per week.

A maximal effort one-time exercise snack (MO_ES)

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years - 35 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Healthy, as determined by self-reported health history
  • Enrolled as a college or university student (full-time or part-time)
  • Not currently participating in a structured upper-body resistance training program
  • No participation in upper-body resistance training (e.g., weightlifting, calisthenics, CrossFit, bodyweight strength programs) for ≥ 3 months prior to study enrollment
  • Willing and able to perform maximal and submaximal push-up and plank exercises
  • Willing to refrain from initiating any new upper-body resistance training during the study period
  • Able to provide written informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Current participation in an upper-body resistance training program or engagement in upper-body strength training within the past 3 months
  • History of upper extremity, shoulder, elbow, wrist, or trunk injury within the past 6 months that could limit exercise performance
  • History of neurological, cardiovascular, metabolic, or musculoskeletal disorders that contraindicate resistance exercise
  • Current pain or discomfort in the shoulders, elbows, wrists, hands, neck, or low back during pushing or plank activities
  • Previous surgery to the upper extremities or spine within the past 12 months
  • Use of medications that may significantly affect muscle performance, fatigue, or neuromuscular function
  • Pregnancy or suspected pregnancy
  • Any condition deemed by the investigators to pose an increased risk during maximal or repeated resistance exercise

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

New York Institute of Technology

Old Westbury, New York, 11568, United States

Location

Related Publications (42)

  • Marijancic V, Grubic Kezele T, Peharec S, Dragas-Zubalj N, Pavicic Zezelj S, Starcevic-Klasan G. Relationship between Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior, Spinal Curvatures, Endurance and Balance of the Trunk Muscles-Extended Physical Health Analysis in Young Adults. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Oct 18;20(20):6938. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20206938.

    PMID: 37887676BACKGROUND
  • Jett KM, Daniels BT, Brigance M, Passarelli JL, Howie EK. A Qualitative Description of Graduate Students' Perceived Decline in Physical Activity from Undergraduate School. Int J Exerc Sci. 2024 Aug 1;17(5):1038-1055. doi: 10.70252/ORGX1052. eCollection 2024.

    PMID: 39257547BACKGROUND
  • Stork MJ, Marcotte-Chenard A, Jung ME, Little JP. Exercise in the workplace: examining the receptivity of practical and time-efficient stair-climbing "exercise snacks". Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2024 Jan 1;49(1):30-40. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2023-0128. Epub 2023 Sep 25.

    PMID: 37748202BACKGROUND
  • DiFrancisco-Donoghue J, Werner W, Douris PC. Comparison of once-weekly and twice-weekly strength training in older adults. Br J Sports Med. 2007 Jan;41(1):19-22. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2006.029330. Epub 2006 Oct 24.

    PMID: 17062657BACKGROUND
  • Brandt T, Schwandner CTL, Schmidt A. Resistance exercise snacks improve muscle mass in female university employees: a prospective, controlled, intervention pilot-study. Front Public Health. 2024 Feb 6;12:1347825. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1347825. eCollection 2024.

    PMID: 38379679BACKGROUND
  • Perkin OJ, McGuigan PM, Stokes KA. Exercise Snacking to Improve Muscle Function in Healthy Older Adults: A Pilot Study. J Aging Res. 2019 Oct 3;2019:7516939. doi: 10.1155/2019/7516939. eCollection 2019.

    PMID: 31687210BACKGROUND
  • Yin M, Zheng H, Bai M, Huang G, Chen Z, Deng S, Lyu M, Deng J, Zhang B, Li H, Zhang X, Liu Q, Little JP, Li Y. Effects of Integrating Stair Climbing-Based Exercise Snacks Into the Campus on Feasibility, Perceived Efficacy, and Participation Perspectives in Inactive Young Adults: A Randomized Mixed-Methods Pilot Study. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2024 Dec;34(12):e14771. doi: 10.1111/sms.14771.

    PMID: 39587826BACKGROUND
  • Yin M, Deng S, Chen Z, Zhang B, Zheng H, Bai M, Li H, Zhang X, Deng J, Liu Q, Little JP, Li Y. Exercise snacks are a time-efficient alternative to moderate-intensity continuous training for improving cardiorespiratory fitness but not maximal fat oxidation in inactive adults: a randomized controlled trial. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2024 Jul 1;49(7):920-932. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2023-0593. Epub 2024 Apr 3.

    PMID: 38569204BACKGROUND
  • Jenkins EM, Nairn LN, Skelly LE, Little JP, Gibala MJ. Do stair climbing exercise "snacks" improve cardiorespiratory fitness? Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2019 Jun;44(6):681-684. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2018-0675. Epub 2019 Jan 16.

    PMID: 30649897BACKGROUND
  • Wang T, Laher I, Li S. Exercise snacks and physical fitness in sedentary populations. Sports Med Health Sci. 2024 Feb 27;7(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.smhs.2024.02.006. eCollection 2025 Jan.

    PMID: 39649791BACKGROUND
  • Western MJ, Welsh T, Keen K, Bishop V, Perkin OJ. Exercise snacking to improve physical function in pre-frail older adult memory clinic patients: a 28-day pilot study. BMC Geriatr. 2023 Aug 4;23(1):471. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04169-6.

    PMID: 37542234BACKGROUND
  • Rodriguez MA, Quintana-Cepedal M, Cheval B, Thogersen-Ntoumani C, Crespo I, Olmedillas H. Effect of exercise snacks on fitness and cardiometabolic health in physically inactive individuals: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2026 Jan 19;60(2):133-141. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2025-110027.

    PMID: 41057224BACKGROUND
  • Hanson, Melanie. "Student Loan Debt Statistics" EducationData.org, 2025-08-08,

    BACKGROUND
  • Herazo-Beltran Y, Pinillos Y, Vidarte J, Crissien E, Suarez D, Garcia R. Predictors of perceived barriers to physical activity in the general adult population: a cross-sectional study. Braz J Phys Ther. 2017 Jan-Feb;21(1):44-50. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2016.04.003. Epub 2017 Jan 14.

    PMID: 28442074BACKGROUND
  • Scroggs GJ, Battista RA, Kappus RM. Bridging the Gap: Promoting Physical Activity in College-Aged Students. Prev Chronic Dis. 2025 Jul 10;22:E36. doi: 10.5888/pcd22.250118. No abstract available.

    PMID: 40638806BACKGROUND
  • Douris PC, D'Agostino NA, Mathew SK, et al. The Physiological and Psychological Effects of the First Year of an Entry-Level Physical Therapist Education Program on Students. Journal of Physical Therapy Education. 2020;34(3):186-191

    BACKGROUND
  • Stephens MB, Cochran C, Hall JM, Olsen C. Physical fitness during medical school: a 4-year study at the Uniformed Services University. Fam Med. 2012 Nov-Dec;44(10):694-7.

    PMID: 23148000BACKGROUND
  • Rimmer JH, Riley B, Wang E, Rauworth A, Jurkowski J. Physical activity participation among persons with disabilities: barriers and facilitators. Am J Prev Med. 2004 Jun;26(5):419-25. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.02.002.

    PMID: 15165658BACKGROUND
  • Milner JD, DeFroda SF, Cruz AI Jr. Fitness habits and barriers to exercise during residency training. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2020 Nov 24;12(3):8507. doi: 10.4081/or.2020.8507. eCollection 2020 Nov 24.

    PMID: 33312484BACKGROUND
  • Gomez-Lopez M, Gallegos AG, Extremera AB. Perceived barriers by university students in the practice of physical activities. J Sports Sci Med. 2010 Sep 1;9(3):374-81. eCollection 2010.

    PMID: 24149629BACKGROUND
  • Cottrell R, Girvan J, McKenzie J, Seabert D, Sterns P. Principles and Foundations of Health Promotion and Education. 7th ed. Pearson Education; 2018.

    BACKGROUND
  • Lindsay Smith G, Banting L, Eime R, O'Sullivan G, van Uffelen JGZ. The association between social support and physical activity in older adults: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Apr 27;14(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0509-8.

    PMID: 28449673BACKGROUND
  • NHS. Physical activity guidelines for adults aged 19 to 64. NHS. Published May 22, 2024.

    BACKGROUND
  • Physical Activity and Your Heart - Recommendations | NHLBI, NIH. www.nhlbi.nih.gov. Published March 24, 2022.

    BACKGROUND
  • American Heart Association. American Heart Association Recommendations for Physical Activity in Adults and Kids. American Heart Association. Published January 19, 2024

    BACKGROUND
  • American College of Sports Medicine. Physical Activity Guidelines. ACSM. Published 2025.

    BACKGROUND
  • Jiahao L, Jiajin L, Yifan L. Effects of resistance training on insulin sensitivity in the elderly: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Exerc Sci Fit. 2021 Oct;19(4):241-251. doi: 10.1016/j.jesf.2021.08.002. Epub 2021 Aug 19.

    PMID: 34552636BACKGROUND
  • Gordon BR, McDowell CP, Hallgren M, Meyer JD, Lyons M, Herring MP. Association of Efficacy of Resistance Exercise Training With Depressive Symptoms: Meta-analysis and Meta-regression Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 Jun 1;75(6):566-576. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.0572.

    PMID: 29800984BACKGROUND
  • Massini DA, Nedog FH, de Oliveira TP, Almeida TAF, Santana CAA, Neiva CM, Macedo AG, Castro EA, Espada MC, Santos FJ, Pessoa Filho DM. The Effect of Resistance Training on Bone Mineral Density in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Jun 17;10(6):1129. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10061129.

    PMID: 35742181BACKGROUND
  • Hong AR, Kim SW. Effects of Resistance Exercise on Bone Health. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2018 Dec;33(4):435-444. doi: 10.3803/EnM.2018.33.4.435.

    PMID: 30513557BACKGROUND
  • Liu CJ, Latham NK. Progressive resistance strength training for improving physical function in older adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 8;2009(3):CD002759. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002759.pub2.

    PMID: 19588334BACKGROUND
  • Hunter GR, McCarthy JP, Bamman MM. Effects of resistance training on older adults. Sports Med. 2004;34(5):329-48. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200434050-00005.

    PMID: 15107011BACKGROUND
  • Al-Ozairi E, Alsaeed D, Alroudhan D, Voase N, Hasan A, Gill JMR, Sattar N, Welsh P, Gray CM, Boonpor J, Celis-Morales C, Gray SR. Skeletal Muscle and Metabolic Health: How Do We Increase Muscle Mass and Function in People with Type 2 Diabetes? J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021 Jan 23;106(2):309-317. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa835.

    PMID: 33336682BACKGROUND
  • Jun JE, Lee SE, Lee YB, Kim G, Jin SM, Jee JH, Kim JH. Low Skeletal Muscle Mass Accompanied by Abdominal Obesity Additively Increases the Risk of Incident Type 2 Diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2023 Apr 13;108(5):1173-1180. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgac662.

    PMID: 36394524BACKGROUND
  • von Haehling S, Morley JE, Anker SD. An overview of sarcopenia: facts and numbers on prevalence and clinical impact. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2010 Dec;1(2):129-133. doi: 10.1007/s13539-010-0014-2. Epub 2010 Dec 17.

    PMID: 21475695BACKGROUND
  • Falls and Fractures in Older Adults: Causes and Prevention. National Institute on Aging. Accessed November 20, 2025.

    BACKGROUND
  • Landi F, Calvani R, Martone AM, Salini S, Zazzara MB, Candeloro M, Coelho-Junior HJ, Tosato M, Picca A, Marzetti E. Normative values of muscle strength across ages in a 'real world' population: results from the longevity check-up 7+ project. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2020 Dec;11(6):1562-1569. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12610. Epub 2020 Nov 4.

    PMID: 33147374BACKGROUND
  • Brown RT, Diaz-Ramirez LG, Boscardin WJ, Cappola AR, Lee SJ, Steinman MA. Changes in the Hierarchy of Functional Impairment From Middle Age to Older Age. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2022 Aug 12;77(8):1577-1584. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glab250.

    PMID: 34498040BACKGROUND
  • Drescher C, Konishi M, Ebner N, Springer J. Loss of muscle mass: current developments in cachexia and sarcopenia focused on biomarkers and treatment. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2015 Dec;6(4):303-11. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12082. Epub 2015 Nov 18.

    PMID: 26676067BACKGROUND
  • Leon AS. Attenuation of Adverse Effects of Aging on Skeletal Muscle by Regular Exercise and Nutritional Support. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2016 Jun 23;11(1):4-16. doi: 10.1177/1559827615589319. eCollection 2017 Jan-Feb.

    PMID: 30202306BACKGROUND
  • Volpi E, Nazemi R, Fujita S. Muscle tissue changes with aging. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2004 Jul;7(4):405-10. doi: 10.1097/01.mco.0000134362.76653.b2.

    PMID: 15192443BACKGROUND
  • Keller K, Engelhardt M. Strength and muscle mass loss with aging process. Age and strength loss. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2014 Feb 24;3(4):346-50. eCollection 2013 Oct.

    PMID: 24596700BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Alexander Rothstein

    New York Institute of Technology

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
BASIC SCIENCE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 6, 2026

First Posted

January 23, 2026

Study Start

February 1, 2026

Primary Completion

March 24, 2026

Study Completion

April 25, 2026

Last Updated

April 9, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

We will upload our shared anonymized data using DryAd.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
Time Frame
The information will be available May 2026 and remain for 5 years.
Access Criteria
Access will require access to DryAd or a request for access to the researchers.

Locations