Study Stopped
COVID-19
Effectiveness of Quick Icing (QI) Technique on Strenght of Jump.
QIJ
Effectiveness of Quick Icing Technique on Force of Jump: Valuation Through a Jump Platform and a Mobile Application.
1 other identifier
interventional
150
1 country
1
Brief Summary
It is known that cryotherapy has various therapeutic applications, among which are the control of the inflammatory process, resolution of edema, analgesia and decreased spasticity. In addition, the use of cold as an agent to decrease or facilitate neuromuscular activity has been documented. The scientific information that supports the relationship of short duration cold with the improvement of the motor response is scarce and outdated. The objective of this design is to evaluate the effectiveness of rapid cooling or Quick Icing technique in the improvement of muscular performance. The foregoing would be relevant in the field of Kinesiology (Physiotherapy) because it would attribute cold properties that could influence the increase in muscle strength, favoring the performance of different therapeutic exercises, training or high performance sport, in addition to supporting the proposal of this intervention in patients with particular neurological disorders.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 30, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 5, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 21, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2025
CompletedAugust 14, 2025
August 1, 2025
7 months
June 30, 2019
August 12, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Comparing maximum jump strength changes pre and post application of cold.
Force evaluated through movil aplication and jump plataform.
Baseline and 2 hours later (1 session of treatment)
Study Arms (3)
Experimental: Quick Icing
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup receiving the application of cold on the ventral side of the thigh (bilaterally) for 30 seconds, using the technique of ice beakers dynamically.
Experimental: Prolonged Cold
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup receiving the intervention of "ice bag" for a period of eight minutes n the ventral side of the thigh (bilaterally).
Control:
NO INTERVENTIONGroup that does not receive intervention and that will rest for ten minutes.
Interventions
Brief Application of cold, for a period of up to 30 seconds on a body surface which seeks to promote the activation of the nervous system to produce increased excitability.
Prolonged application of cold, for at least 5 minutes or more, on a body surface that aims to reduce nervous system activation by reducing the decreased nerve conduction velocity.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Students of the Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences of Andrés Bello University, belonging to Occupational Therapy, Phonoaudiology and Kinesiology careers (first to third year).
- Over 18 years.
- No musculoskeletal conditions (sprains, tears, fractures, dislocations, peripheral neuropathies and contusions) in the lower extremities in the last six months.
You may not qualify if:
- Presence of pain or discomfort when performing the jump test against movement of the Bosco test.
- Intolerance to the cold.
- Pathologies such as cryoglobulinemia, Raynaud's disease or paroxysmal hemoglobinuria induced by cold.
- Rheumatoid diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus, multiple myeloma or rheumatoid arthritis.
- Adverse reactions to the ice cube test (positive test).
- Osteosynthesis materials or endoprosthesis in the lower limb.
- Elimination Criteria
- No tolerance to the intervention with cold that forces to suspend the treatment.
- Non-completion of the evaluation protocol (Attendance at all scheduled sessions).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Universidad Andrés Bello
Santiago, Las Condes, 7591538, Chile
Related Publications (16)
Lewis M, Clayfield J. Temperature changes following quick icing: a brief investigation. Aust J Physiother. 1981 Dec;27(6):175-8. doi: 10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60756-X.
PMID: 25025468BACKGROUNDGoff B. The application of recent advances in neurophysiology to Miss M. Rood's concept of neuromuscular facilitation. Physiotherapy. 1972 Dec 10;58(12):409-15. No abstract available.
PMID: 4668364BACKGROUNDMoseley BE, Williams E. Repair of damage; DNA in bacteria. Adv Microb Physiol. 1977;16:99-156. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2911(08)60048-x. No abstract available.
PMID: 343549BACKGROUNDOliver RA, Johnson DJ, Wheelhouse WW, Griffin PP. Isometric muscle contraction response during recovery from reduced intramuscular temperature. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1979 Mar;60(3):126-9.
PMID: 485802BACKGROUNDLee JM, Warren MP, Mason SM. Effects of ice on nerve conduction velocity. Physiotherapy. 1978 Jan;64(1):2-6. No abstract available.
PMID: 628689BACKGROUNDCLARKE RS, HELLON RF, LIND AR. Vascular reactions of the human forearm to cold. Clin Sci. 1958 Feb;17(1):165-79. No abstract available.
PMID: 13511729BACKGROUNDBelitsky RB, Odam SJ, Hubley-Kozey C. Evaluation of the effectiveness of wet ice, dry ice, and cryogenic packs in reducing skin temperature. Phys Ther. 1987 Jul;67(7):1080-4. doi: 10.1093/ptj/67.7.1080.
PMID: 3602101BACKGROUNDChesterton LS, Foster NE, Ross L. Skin temperature response to cryotherapy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002 Apr;83(4):543-9. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2002.30926.
PMID: 11932859BACKGROUNDOtte JW, Merrick MA, Ingersoll CD, Cordova ML. Subcutaneous adipose tissue thickness alters cooling time during cryotherapy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002 Nov;83(11):1501-5. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2002.34833.
PMID: 12422316BACKGROUNDWarren TA, McCarty EC, Richardson AL, Michener T, Spindler KP. Intra-articular knee temperature changes: ice versus cryotherapy device. Am J Sports Med. 2004 Mar;32(2):441-5. doi: 10.1177/0363546503258864.
PMID: 14977671BACKGROUNDHerrera E, Sandoval MC, Camargo DM, Salvini TF. Motor and sensory nerve conduction are affected differently by ice pack, ice massage, and cold water immersion. Phys Ther. 2010 Apr;90(4):581-91. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20090131. Epub 2010 Feb 25.
PMID: 20185615BACKGROUNDVan Hooren B, Zolotarjova J. The Difference Between Countermovement and Squat Jump Performances: A Review of Underlying Mechanisms With Practical Applications. J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Jul;31(7):2011-2020. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001913.
PMID: 28640774BACKGROUNDBobbert MF, Gerritsen KG, Litjens MC, Van Soest AJ. Why is countermovement jump height greater than squat jump height? Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1996 Nov;28(11):1402-12. doi: 10.1097/00005768-199611000-00009.
PMID: 8933491BACKGROUNDEarp JE, Joseph M, Kraemer WJ, Newton RU, Comstock BA, Fragala MS, Dunn-Lewis C, Solomon-Hill G, Penwell ZR, Powell MD, Volek JS, Denegar CR, Hakkinen K, Maresh CM. Lower-body muscle structure and its role in jump performance during squat, countermovement, and depth drop jumps. J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Mar;24(3):722-9. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181d32c04.
PMID: 20195084BACKGROUNDRuiz-Cardenas JD, Rodriguez-Juan JJ, Rios-Diaz J. Relationship between jumping abilities and skeletal muscle architecture of lower limbs in humans: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Mov Sci. 2018 Apr;58:10-20. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2018.01.005. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
PMID: 29334674BACKGROUNDCooper CN, Dabbs NC, Davis J, Sauls NM. Effects of Lower-Body Muscular Fatigue on Vertical Jump and Balance Performance. J Strength Cond Res. 2020 Oct;34(10):2903-2910. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002882.
PMID: 30273290BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hernán A de la Barra Ortiz, Mg.
Universidad Andrés Bello
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Investigator and Clinical Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 30, 2019
First Posted
July 5, 2019
Study Start
April 21, 2025
Primary Completion
December 1, 2025
Study Completion
December 1, 2025
Last Updated
August 14, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share