Physical Activity and Exercise During Early Treatment Phases for Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia to Protect Against Muscle Loss and Improve Frailty Outcomes
PROTECT
The PROTECT Trial Physical Activity and Exercise During Early Treatment for Children With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia to Protect Against Sarcopenia and Improve Frailty Outcomes: a Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a small trial testing out a new approach before doing a bigger study. Researchers are observing a group of children/adolescents (ages 5-17) with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and testing a physical activity and exercise program on a group of them who after 5 weeks of treatment show signs of weakness or frailty. Kids who are NOT losing muscle aren't part of the exercise trial - they're just monitored over time to see how they do. The goal: To see if an exercise program helps kids who are getting weaker from acute lymphoblastic leukemia treatment build back/maintain their strength, compared to kids who don't do the extra intervention. The study will also look at if this way of measuring muscle weakness works well for kids with cancer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2026
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 18, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 8, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 24, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 17, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2028
April 13, 2026
January 1, 2026
2.4 years
December 18, 2025
April 8, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (11)
Mean change in muscle mass of rectus femoris on muscle ultrasound
Muscle mass is measured via ultrasound by cross-sectional area and thickness of rectus femoris at enrolment/diagnosis compared with pre-delayed intensification (post-intervention). This will be used to determine the sample size required for a future randomised controlled trial.
Baseline, 16 weeks
Mean change in grip strength with handheld dynamometry
Grip strength is measured by handheld dynamometry at post-induction (pre-intervention) compared with pre-delayed intensification (post-intervention). This will be used to determine the sample size required for a future randomised controlled trial.
5 weeks, 16 weeks
Mean change in knee extension strength on handheld dynamometry
Knee extension strength is measured by using handheld dynamometry at post-induction (pre-intervention) and pre-delayed intensification (post-intervention). This will be used to determine the sample size required for a future randomised controlled trial.
5 weeks, 16 weeks
Mean change in lean muscle mass on Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) scan
Quantity of lean muscle mass as measured on DEXA scan. This will be used to determine the sample size required for a future randomised controlled trial.
5 weeks and 24 weeks
Qualitative acceptability
Measured by a semi-structured interview designed with Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and TFA theory
16 weeks
Fidelity of the intervention
Measured using the National Institutes of Health Behavior Change Consortium (NIH BCC) framework for fidelity of delivery, receipt and enactment.
Post-randomisation through to the final intervention session [anticipated at 15 weeks]
Feasibility of the trial measured by recruitment rate
Number of participants recruited compared with those given the study brief, and reasons for refusal.
through study recruitment completion, approximately 15 months
Feasibility of the trial measured by lost recruitment opportunities
the number of participants screened by the research team compared to number of eligible children admitted to ward across the study period.
through study recruitment completion, approximately 15 months
Feasibility of the intervention measured by the attrition rate
Rate and reasons for attrition of participants from the trial
through study completion, approximately 17 months
Trial safety is measured by the frequency and severity of recorded adverse events related to the trial
Adverse events will be assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0
through study completion, approximately 17 months
Feasibility of assessments is measured by the number of completed assessments
Percentage of data recorded for each individual outcome measure compared to the number of planned outcome measures, and reasons for non-completed data.
Through study completion, approximately 17 months
Secondary Outcomes (32)
Acceptability measured by Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA) survey
Baseline, mid intervention (4-7 weeks), 16 weeks (post intervention)
Satisfaction of participants during the intervention
Post-randomisation through to the final intervention session [anticipated at 15 weeks]
Mean change in Lumbar spine bone mineral density measured by DEXA
5 weeks and 24 weeks
Mean change of appendicular lean muscle mass on DEXA
5 weeks and 24 weeks
Mean change in hip bone mineral density measured by DEXA
5 weeks and 24 weeks
- +27 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Observation cohort
NO INTERVENTIONThese participants did not have early signs of sarcopenia at the post induction therapy assessment point, but will be followed up at all timepoints to better understand the natural progression of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Usual care is a ward based physiotherapist service which is reactive and referral based only.
Usual care control group
NO INTERVENTIONThese participants demonstrated early signs of sarcopenia at the post induction phase of treatment assessment point and were randomised to the control group. Usual care is a ward based physiotherapist service which is reactive and referral based only.
Intervention group
EXPERIMENTALThese participants demonstrated early signs of sarcopenia at the post induction phase of treatment assessment point and were randomised to the intervention group. The intervention group receives 9 weeks of goal setting and physical activity behaviour change coaching, as well as concurrently receiving 8 weeks of structured exercise sessions weekly (45-60 minutes per session x 3/week). These sessions are individualised based on the participant's functional performance outcomes from the assessment prior to randomisation, with a resistance strength training and progressive overload principles. The delivery of the specific exercises will be based on a pragmatic, participation based focus and will incorporate the individual's development stage, age, interests and enjoyment.
Interventions
These participants demonstrated early signs of sarcopenia at the post induction phase of treatment assessment point and were randomised to the intervention group. The intervention group receives 9 weeks of goal setting and physical activity behaviour change coaching (with activity tracking via Fitbit for continuous feedback) as well as concurrent 8 weeks of 3x45-60 minute structured exercise sessions weekly. These are individualised based on their functional performance outcomes from the assessment prior to randomisation with a resistance strength training and progressive overload principles. The delivery of the specific exercises will be based on a pragmatic, participation based focus and will incorporate the individuals development stage, age, interests and enjoyment.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Aged 5-17 years at the time of consent
- New diagnosis of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia \<7 days
- Is planned to receive management for their cancer treatment at the trial site for the duration of the trial period
- Has a legally acceptable representative capable of understanding the informed consent document in English and providing consent on the participant's behalf
- Have a family electronic device that can be linked with the tool to be used (Fitbit)
You may not qualify if:
- none
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Royal Children's Hospital
Melbourne, Victoria, 3052, Australia
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Rachel Conyers, A/Prof Paediatric Oncologist
Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital (Melbourne), University of Melbourne
Central Study Contacts
Ella Thorburn, Bachelor of Physiotherapy(hon)
CONTACT
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Due to the nature of the intervention the provider of the intervention will not be blinded and nor will the participant. The investigator will be blinded where possible and any unblinding will be recorded and reported.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 18, 2025
First Posted
January 8, 2026
Study Start
February 24, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
July 17, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2028
Last Updated
April 13, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
There is an optional consent for the data collected to be used in future studies however, there are no data sharing agreements in place and therefore future studies would be using data under the original data agreements and protocols. A protocol publication is planned and will be linked to the registration when it is complete.