NCT07223853

Brief Summary

20 million patients have surgery in the United States every year, with approximately 1 million of those patients requiring life-saving blood transfusion. Presurgical preparation for transfusion is important to allow for safe and timely transfusion during surgery; however, excessive preparation is unfortunately common, costly, and contributes to blood waste. This study aims to evaluate an intelligent clinical decision support system that helps clinicians prepare blood for patients who are likely to need it, while avoiding excessive preparation for patients who don't, potentially improving patient safety while reducing blood waste and healthcare costs.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable surgery

Timeline
6mo left

Started Oct 2025

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress54%
Oct 2025Jan 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 28, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 28, 2025

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 3, 2025

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2026

Expected
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2027

Last Updated

February 27, 2026

Status Verified

February 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

October 28, 2025

Last Update Submit

February 23, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

artificial intelligenceclinical decision supportmachine learningsurgeryperioperative blood managementanesthesiapretransfusion testing

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Frequency of patients with a type and screen order placed during the preoperative clinic assessment visit

    This is a binary outcome at the patient / surgical case level, which will be aggregated across all patients in the study to produce an overall frequency. Placement of a type and screen order during the preoperative clinic assessment visit will be evaluated at the patient / surgical case level. This includes orders placed and collected during the preoperative clinic assessment visit, as well as orders signed during the preoperative clinic assessment visit or subsequent follow up care and held to be drawn on the day of surgery.

    Decision made during the preoperative assessment clinic visit

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Frequency of a valid type and screen order at the start of surgery

    Start of surgery (1 hour after Anesthesia Start)

  • Frequency of red cell transfusion during surgery

    During surgery

  • Frequency of emergency release blood use during surgery

    During surgery

  • Frequency of red cell transfusion during surgery without an active type and screen at the start of surgery

    During surgery

  • Frequency of transfusion reaction

    From time of surgery to hospital discharge or 30 days after surgery

Other Outcomes (3)

  • Viewing S-PATH predictions (Implementation outcome)

    Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  • Acceptance of S-PATH recommendation (Implementation outcome)

    Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  • Cost assessment

    Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Study Arms (2)

Usual care

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Usual care for determining presurgical blood orders, including use of the institutional Maximum Surgical Blood Ordering Schedule (MSBOS)

Other: Usual care

S-PATH

EXPERIMENTAL

Access to the S-PATH clinical decision support system

Other: S-PATH clinical decision support system

Interventions

Access to the S-PATH electronic health record (EHR)-integrated clinical decision support system

S-PATH

Including use of the conventional Maximum Surgical Blood Ordering Schedule (MSBOS)

Usual care

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may not qualify if:

  • Clinician (resident physician or advanced practice provider) who works at a preoperative assessment clinic
  • None
  • Scheduled for surgery in one of the main operating room areas (non-remote) at Barnes Jewish Hospital
  • Evaluated in-person at one of the preoperative assessment clinics affiliated with BJC Healthcare
  • Have a valid S-PATH model prediction prior to their preoperative assessment clinic visit
  • Pregnant
  • Presence or history of red cell alloantibodies

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Washington University / Barnes Jewish Hospital

St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States

RECRUITING

Related Publications (4)

  • Yang P, Zijlstra EP, Hall BL, Gregory SH, Jackups R Jr, Li J, Abraham J, Lou SS. Challenges in reliable preoperative blood ordering: A qualitative interview study. Transfusion. 2024 Oct;64(10):1889-1898. doi: 10.1111/trf.18012. Epub 2024 Sep 16.

    PMID: 39279676BACKGROUND
  • Lou SS, Liu H, Lu C, Wildes TS, Hall BL, Kannampallil T. Personalized Surgical Transfusion Risk Prediction Using Machine Learning to Guide Preoperative Type and Screen Orders. Anesthesiology. 2022 Jul 1;137(1):55-66. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000004139.

    PMID: 35147666BACKGROUND
  • Lou SS, Liu Y, Cohen ME, Ko CY, Hall BL, Kannampallil T. National Multi-Institutional Validation of a Surgical Transfusion Risk Prediction Model. J Am Coll Surg. 2024 Jan 1;238(1):99-105. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000874. Epub 2023 Sep 22.

    PMID: 37737660BACKGROUND
  • Lou SS, Kumar S, Goss CW, Avidan MS, Kheterpal S, Kannampallil T; Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group. Multicenter Validation of a Machine Learning Model for Surgical Transfusion Risk at 45 US Hospitals. JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jun 2;8(6):e2517760. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.17760.

    PMID: 40577014BACKGROUND

Central Study Contacts

Sunny S Lou, MD, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SCREENING
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: Stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 28, 2025

First Posted

November 3, 2025

Study Start

October 28, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2027

Last Updated

February 27, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

For each clinician, the final dataset will include self-reported demographic information, exit interview transcripts, and behavioral and implementation outcomes relating to usage of the proposed clinical decision support (CDS) intervention. For each patient, the final dataset will include clinical and safety outcomes for the study. Trial materials, including consent forms, protocols, and code book for qualitative analysis will also be shared. To anonymize the data, all clinicians and patients will be assigned random identifiers to replace clinician names and patient medical record numbers. No dates for surgical encounters will be retained. All other incidental identifiers (such as mentions of care team member names, encounter numbers, or hospital units) will be stripped.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
Data will be made available within 12 months of the grant period ending or on publication of a manuscript using the data, whichever comes first. Data will be retained in the WashU Libraries Open Scholarship Digital Research Materials Repository for at least 10 years.
Access Criteria
The proposed clinical trial will involve a near-complete sampling of clinicians who work at the host institution's preoperative assessment clinic. Even with removal of identifiers, we believe it would be difficult to protect the identities of clinician participants given the type of demographic data collected and the very restricted setting in which recruitment will occur. In addition, even if patient data is anonymized, it may be possible to reidentify the patients using metadata alone. Therefore, access controls will be required prior to sharing of the all data, including patient and clinician data. Specifically, data will be shared only under a data-sharing agreement according to institutional guidelines that provides for: (1) a commitment to using the data only for research purposes and not to identify any individual participant; (2) a commitment to securing the data using appropriate computer technology; and (3) a commitment to destroying the data after analyses are complete.

Locations