Improving Access to Surgical Care: Safety, Efficacy, and Satisfaction With Postoperative Telehealth
1 other identifier
interventional
3,000
1 country
4
Brief Summary
Background: A quarter of US Veterans reside in rural communities and are significantly older than their urban counterparts. Providing timely access to care is especially important in this older, independent and medically complex cohort. Virtual care, by phone or video, has improved access to care in non-surgical specialties; however, its utilization in surgery is less than 10% and has continued to decline after the COVID pandemic. Recent studies in surgical patients have demonstrated no difference in missed adverse events, emergency department visits or readmissions; but these data are limited to routine, low-risk procedures in large, urban centers. Routine telehealth for low and high-complexity surgery could be of particular benefit to rural patients by reducing travel challenges, costs, improving scheduling flexibility and reinforcing independence. The hypothesis is that routine telehealth follow-up for elective surgical procedures, of all complexity, will provide equivalent outcomes and improved patient satisfaction and access in comparison to face-to-face follow-up. Significance: VA Integrated Service Network (VISN) 19 is the largest geographic region in the VA system and includes four intermediate/complex VA Medical Centers (VAMC) serving rural and urban patients across 10 states. Almost 4000 unique patients are seen annually at these 4 centers resulting in 2600 operations and over 16,000 patient encounters. Another 2500 unique patients are referred to community care (CC) at a cost of over $5 million in FY23. Improving access through telehealth in this largely rural VISN will positively impact Veterans and reduce community care expenditures in addition to improving patient and provider satisfaction. Innovation \& Impact: There are currently no funded or published randomized trials evaluating the efficacy of telehealth in providing postoperative surgical care to rural patients. The proposal will provide robust, Level 1 data confirming the safety of postoperative telehealth care. In addition, the investigators will provide the only evaluation of both the patient and provider experience in rural, surgical telehealth care. They will leverage the largest geographic region, VISN19, to ensure broad applicability of findings to rural and urban Veterans. Specific Aims: Aim 1: Evaluate the safety of postoperative telehealth in rural and urban Veterans. Aim 2: Evaluate the usability and patient satisfaction of telehealth in comparison to in-person postoperative follow-up. Aim 3: Evaluate the usability and provider satisfaction of telehealth in comparison to in-person follow-up. Methodology: Patients undergoing elective general surgical procedures (both inpatient and outpatient) at four VA medical centers (Denver, CO; Oklahoma City, OK; Muskogee, OK; Salt Lake City, UT) in VISN 19 will be randomized to post-operative follow-up in person or via telehealth. Patients who discharge with drains or wound vacuum therapy, permanent suture or staples will be excluded. Aim 1: 30-day morbidity, missed adverse events (complications that may have been recognized with in-person follow-up), 30-day mortality, 30-day readmission, and 30-day ED visits will be compared evaluated to determine safety of telehealth follow-up. Aim 2: Post-operative surveys at 6 weeks after surgery will quantify acceptability of telehealth follow-up via the standardized Telehealth Usability Questionnaire; satisfaction and usability will be compared via the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Outpatient and Ambulatory Surgery survey (S-CAHPS) between the groups. Patients will also be characterized by baseline demographics, distance to nearest facility, socioeconomic vulnerability and procedure type to further define optimal cohorts for future telehealth participation and implementation. Aim 3: Usability and satisfaction for Providers will be determined by self-developed survey. Bi-monthly responses will be recorded to define trends and optimize future implementation. Next Steps/Implementation: If safe and acceptable to patients and providers, standardization for telehealth follow-up after surgery can be implemented nation-wide to improve access to care and satisfaction.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable surgery
Started Jan 2025
Typical duration for not_applicable surgery
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 11, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 18, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2027
January 18, 2024
January 1, 2024
1.9 years
December 11, 2023
January 6, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Missed Adverse Events
Complications that could have been identified with routine follow-up
30 days
Patient Satisfaction
5-point Likert Scale
6 weeks
Provider Satisfaction
5-Point Likert Scale
6 weeks
Study Arms (2)
In-Person
NO INTERVENTIONPatients will follow-up in-person after surgery
Telehealth
EXPERIMENTALPatients will follow-up via phone after surgery
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients undergoing general surgery or surgical oncologic surgeries
You may not qualify if:
- patients with placement of permanent sutures, wound vacuum devices, staples or other wound devices or drains that would require in-person postoperative follow-up for removal
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (4)
Rocky Mountain Regional VAMC
Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States
Eastern Oklahoma VAMC
Muskogee, Oklahoma, 74401, United States
Oklahoma CIty VAMC
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104, United States
Salt Lake City VAMC
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84148, United States
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- FED
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Deputy Chief of Surgery
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 11, 2023
First Posted
January 18, 2024
Study Start
January 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 1, 2027
Last Updated
January 18, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Given the multiple site locations, we are unable to share data without sharing information that can be used to identify individual Veterans and VA Medical Centers.