Figure-of-eight Backward Walk Test in Elderly
elderly
Determination of Reliability, Validity, and Minimal Detectable Change (MDC) of the Figure-of-eight Backward Walking Test in Elderly Adults
1 other identifier
observational
87
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Mobility is a fundamental element of healthy aging. Balance is a necessary function during mobility for all movements throughout life in elderly individuals. Falls due to balance disorders in elderly individuals cause a decrease in the quality of life. Studies in the literature indicate that 13% of individuals aged 65-69 experience falls, and this rate rises to 46% in individuals over 85. Lower extremity muscle volume and strength gradually decrease with aging. This decreased muscle strength directly impacts individuals' activities of daily living.Normal walking speed for elderly individuals is related to balance and overall health performance. However, walking assessments generally focus on walking activities in a forward direction and in a straight line. However, in daily life, we may need to sit on a chair, walk backward to navigate a narrow space, or change direction suddenly due to obstacles or environmental cues. Walking backward requires more complex motor control, and these gait training programs are known to be effective in improving balance and walking skills.Clinically, balance assessments in the elderly persons are commonly measured by using the TUG, 10-meter walk test, functional reach test, 4-square step test, and Berg balance scale. The methods used to assess balance are still not fully standardized. The best test for assessing dynamic balance and fall risk is still up for debate, especially when it comes to elderly individuals who live freely in the community. Further research is needed to determine whether lateral walking tests can identify those at high risk of falling in elderly adults. The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability, validity, and minimal detectable change (MDC) of the Figure-of-8 backward walking test in healthy elderly adults.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started May 2025
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 5, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 18, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 15, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 30, 2026
CompletedDecember 19, 2025
December 1, 2025
9 months
September 5, 2025
December 18, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
figure-of-eight backward walking test
In the figure-of-eight backward walking (F8BWT) test, participants begin at the midpoint of two cones 1.5 m apart. Participants walk backward, circle both cones, and record the time it takes to return to the starting point. The test is administered by both raters on the first and second days.The assessments will be conducted by two separate specialists(physiotherapists). Individuals' completion times for each activity during the tests will be recorded using a stopwatch. Assessments will be conducted over two days, in two sessions per day. On the first day, in the first session, the first assessor (PT1) will perform the F8BWT twice. In the second session, the second assessor (PT2) will perform the F8BWT twice. The average of the two recorded times will be noted. On the second day of the assessment, the PT2 will begin by performing the F8BWT. PT2 will then perform the F8BWT twice. The average of the two recorded times will be noted.
On the day 1, in the first session, the first assessor (PT1) will perform the F8BWT twice. In the second session, the second assessor (PT2) will perform the F8BWT twice.
Secondary Outcomes (8)
SOCIODEMOGRAPHIC FORM
On the day1, in the first session, the first assessor (PT1) will record.
8-Figure Walk Test
On the day1, in the first session, the first assessor (PT1) will record.
Timed Up and Go Test (TUG)
On the first day1, in the first session, the first assessor (PT1) will record.
Modified 4-Square Step Test (mFSST)
On the first day1, in the first session, the first assessor (PT1) will record.
3-Meter Backward Walk Test (3MGYT)
On the day1, in the first session, the first assessor (PT1) will record.
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
1/study group
Healthy elderly individuals over the age of 65 living in the city center of Kahramanmaraş
Eligibility Criteria
It is planned to include elderly individuals over 65 years of age residing in the Kahramanmaraş city center in the scope of the research, and healthy elderly individuals over 65 years of age (n=87) who can be reached by random sampling method will be included in the research.
You may qualify if:
- Healthy elderly individuals over 65 years of age.
- Elderly individuals who have fluent in Turkish and able to communicate.
- Elderly individuals who have no cognitive impairment.
You may not qualify if:
- Elderly individuals who have any neurological problems (Parkinson's, hemiplegia, etc.)
- Elderly individuals who have any orthopedic problems (fractures, etc., in the last year)
- Elderly individuals who have a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 40 kg/m2
- Elderly individuals who havevision problems
- Elderly individuals who have had any lower extremity surgery in the last year
- Elderly individuals who use any mobility aids
- Elderly individuals who refuse to participate in the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Kahramanmaraş Sütçü imam University, Faculty of Health Science, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation
Kahramanmaraş, Onikişubat, 46100, Turkey (Türkiye)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
hatice adıgüzel tat, Associate Professor
Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Abdülkadir Ertürk, Msc
Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University
- STUDY CHAIR
Yusuf Şinasi Kırmacı, Asisstant Prof
Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University
- STUDY CHAIR
mehmet göğremiş, Asisstant Prof
Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University
- STUDY CHAIR
Mehtap Sönmez, Professor
Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Suat Erel, Professor
Pamukkale University
- STUDY CHAIR
Emel Taşvuran Horata
Sakarya University of Applied Sciences
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 5, 2025
First Posted
September 18, 2025
Study Start
May 1, 2025
Primary Completion
January 15, 2026
Study Completion
January 30, 2026
Last Updated
December 19, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share