The Validity and Reliability of the Modified O'Sullivan Functional Balance (mOFB) Test for Multiple Sclerosis
Application of the Validity and Reliability of the Modified O'Sullivan Functional Balance (mOFB) Test in Multiple Sclerosis Patients
1 other identifier
observational
44
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to investigate the validity and reliability of the Modified O'Sullivan Functional Balance (OFB) Test, which is used to assess balance in individuals diagnosed with Multiple Sclerosis (MS). Multiple Sclerosis is a chronic nervous system disease that can cause symptoms such as balance problems, difficulty walking, and fatigue, which negatively affect daily life. Balance disorders are common in MS patients, increasing the risk of falls and leading to a decrease in physical activity levels. Therefore, the accurate and reliable assessment of balance in MS patients is of great importance. This study will include volunteer MS patients treated at the Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Department of SANKO University Sani Konukoğlu Application and Research Hospital who meet the inclusion criteria. After recording the participants' demographic and disease-related information, their balance, body control, and walking skills will be assessed using various clinical tests. These tests include the Berg Balance Test, Mini-BESTest, O'Sullivan Functional Balance Test, Modified O'Sullivan Functional Balance Test, Trunk Instability Scale, and L Test. Assessments will be conducted taking into account the fatigue commonly seen in MS patients, and participants will be allowed to rest when needed. The results obtained will reveal whether the Modified O'Sullivan Functional Balance Test is a reliable and applicable method for assessing balance in MS patients. It is anticipated that the results of this study will contribute to clinical practice in the assessment of balance in MS patients and assist in the more effective planning of the rehabilitation process.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Aug 2025
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 14, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 15, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 29, 2025
CompletedDecember 29, 2025
December 1, 2025
1 month
December 15, 2025
December 15, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Modified O'Sullivan Functional Balance (mOFB) Test
The mOFB is a modified version of the OFB that incorporates adjusted grading criteria, combined with external resistance to challenge static balance and weight shifting to challenge dynamic balance. A previous study found that this modified test had low to moderate reliability due to the lack of clear test instructions and scoring criteria. To address these limitations, we developed standardised test instructions and scoring criteria, as summarised in the Supplementary Material , before evaluating the psychometric properties of the mOFB. The assessment takes approximately 5 minutes and can be performed on a fixed bed or chair using only a stopwatch. The test condition consists of static sitting balance, dynamic sitting balance, static standing balance, and dynamic standing balance. Scoring is based on observing the patient's ability to maintain balance while sitting or standing quietly for 60 seconds, respond to external disturbances, and reach in various directions beyond
1 YEARS
O'Sullivan Functional Balance Test
The OFB is a scoring tool used to assess both static and dynamic balance in various positions. This test highlights the ability to maintain postural stability and make postural adjustments in response to voluntary movements such as turning the head or torso, reaching for an object on the ground, and shifting body weight. The OFB test uses a 5-level ordinal rating scale: zero, poor, fair, good, and normal. A zero score indicates an inability to maintain balance, while a 'normal' score reflects normal balance performance . This study converted the rating scale into sequential scores ranging from 0 to 4, where 0 indicates an inability to maintain balance independently and 4 indicates normal balance, assessed across four components: static sitting balance, dynamic sitting balance, static standing balance, and dynamic standing balance. The total OFB score is 16, and sub-scores can be given for individual test positions. For example, the static sitting balance sub-score ranges from 0 to 4.
1 YEARS
Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
The BBS is widely used and is currently accepted as the reference standard for assessing balance in individuals who have suffered a stroke. The BBS consists of 14 functional balance tasks that focus on the ability to maintain a position and make postural adjustments based on voluntary movements. It is simple to administer and requires minimal equipment and time to complete. Each item is scored between 0 and 4; 0 indicates inability to perform the task, while 4 indicates optimal performance. The maximum score is 56, and scores below 45 indicate a high risk of falling.
1 YEARS
Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS)
The Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS) is designed to measure motor impairment of the trunk by assessing static and dynamic sitting balance and trunk coordination. The original TIS assesses three components: static sitting balance (maximum score = 7), dynamic sitting balance (maximum score = 10), and trunk coordination (maximum score = 6), with a total of 23 points possible. A key advantage of the TIS is its minimal equipment requirement, making it highly practical for use in clinical settings.
1 YEARS
L test
This test indirectly assesses walking speed and dynamic balance during walking and turning activities. It is a modified version of the TUG test. The walking path is L-shaped. The L test is a more comprehensive test than the TUG test as it involves a greater walking distance and turning activity in both directions. The L test assesses the fundamental components of functional mobility, such as balance, transfer, walking, and turning. During the test, the individual stands up from the chair, walks 3 metres, turns right, walks 7 metres, then turns back and walks along the same path to sit down on the chair. The measured distance will be recorded in metres.
1 YEARS
Mini Best Test
This is one of the clinical tests used to assess walking and balance. It consists of four sub-parameters: preparatory movement, reactive postural control, sensory orientation, and dynamic walking, comprising a total of 14 items. It is a test scored out of a total of 28 points, taking an average of 10-15 minutes to complete. A high score indicates high function.
1 YEARS
Eligibility Criteria
Patients admitted to the Neurology Outpatient Clinic of SANKO University Sani Konukoğlu Application and Research Hospital with a diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis
You may qualify if:
- Participants aged 18-65 years
- Volunteers participating in the study
- Individuals not using any assistive devices
- Individuals unable to maintain the tandem stance test for more than 10 seconds
- Individuals with an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score ≤ 5.5
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant or within the first 3 months postpartum
- Received corticosteroid treatment within the last month
- Took any medication affecting walking ability within the last month
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Sanko Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Sanko Unıversıty
Gaziantep, şehitkamil, 27090, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
HAKAN POLAT, phd
Sanko University
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Sanko University
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 15, 2025
First Posted
December 29, 2025
Study Start
August 1, 2025
Primary Completion
September 1, 2025
Study Completion
December 14, 2025
Last Updated
December 29, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12