Reliability and Quality of YouTube Videos Related to Balance Exercise
Evaluating the Suitability of YouTube as a Platform for Enhancing Dynamic Balance
1 other identifier
observational
91
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aimed to find out how useful and trustworthy YouTube videos are when it comes to teaching dynamic balance exercises. Researchers watched and analyzed selected videos to check the accuracy of the information, how reliable the sources were, and how well the videos were made to help viewers learn. The goal was to help people find better-quality videos for safe and effective balance training.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Aug 2025
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 4, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 12, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 15, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2025
CompletedSeptember 9, 2025
September 1, 2025
17 days
August 4, 2025
September 8, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Quality of videos
The DISCERN tool is a standardized questionnaire developed to enable researchers to systematically evaluate the quality of health information related to treatment options. The instrument comprises 15 specific items followed by an overall assessment question aimed at rating the general quality of the information provided
From registration until the end of the second week
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Quality of videos 2
From registration until the end of the second week
Other Outcomes (1)
Video popularity
From registration until the end of the second week
Interventions
In the study, there will be no participant groups; YouTube videos searched using the keyword "balance exercise" will be evaluated based on specific criteria.
Eligibility Criteria
Videos searched on the YouTube platform using the keyword "balance exercises."
You may qualify if:
- Videos retrieved using the keyword "dynamic balance exercise"
- Videos in English
- Presence of audio narration or explanation
- Demonstration of exercise practices within the video content
You may not qualify if:
- Duplicate videos (i.e., videos with identical or highly similar content)
- Videos with unclear or unintelligible audio and/or visual content
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Nigde Omer Halisdemir University, Bor Faculty of Health Sciences
Niğde, Bor, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (4)
Erdem MN, Karaca S. Evaluating the Accuracy and Quality of the Information in Kyphosis Videos Shared on YouTube. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Nov 15;43(22):E1334-E1339. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002691.
PMID: 29664816RESULTAnastasio AT, Tabarestani TQ, Bagheri K, Bethell MA, Prado I, Taylor JR, Adams SB. A New Trend in Social Media and Medicine: The Poor Quality of Videos Related to Ankle Sprain Exercises on TikTok. Foot Ankle Orthop. 2023 May 4;8(2):24730114231171117. doi: 10.1177/24730114231171117. eCollection 2023 Apr.
PMID: 37151477RESULTSari F, Bazancir Apaydin Z, Sari S. Assessment of reliability and quality of YouTube(R) exercise videos in people with rheumatoid arthritis. Physiother Theory Pract. 2025 Feb;41(2):362-369. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2024.2334753. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
PMID: 38536002RESULTZorlular A, Zorlular R. Evaluating online video platforms for dynamic balance exercises: a focus on YouTube. Phys Sportsmed. 2025 Dec 1:1-8. doi: 10.1080/00913847.2025.2597183. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 41307528DERIVED
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 4, 2025
First Posted
August 12, 2025
Study Start
August 15, 2025
Primary Completion
September 1, 2025
Study Completion
September 1, 2025
Last Updated
September 9, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09