NCT07108686

Brief Summary

Acute leukemia is a blood cancer marked by rapid growth of immature cells, causing bone marrow failure and serious complications. Among these, thrombosis and bleeding are major concerns, significantly increasing illness and death. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurs in about 9% of patients, with some studies showing rates up to 13.6% within the first six months after diagnosis (1,2,3). Bleeding complications are also frequent, with 60-80% of acute leukemia patients developing thrombocytopenia, a major risk factor for life-threatening hemorrhagic events such as intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). In fact, up to 26% of patients may experience clinically significant bleeding during induction therapy, often within the first two weeks of treatment (4,5). The development of thrombosis and bleeding in acute leukemia is complex and involves multiple factors. Leukemic blasts promote clotting, while chemotherapy, infections, and use of central venous catheters further elevate the risk of both bleeding and thrombosis (1,6). Despite the clinical significance of these complications, predicting which patients are at highest risk remains challenging. Several predictive scores have been developed for VTE and bleeding in cancer patients, but their utility in acute leukemia is limited due to the unique risk profile of this population. Recent efforts have focused on developing and validating simplified, leukemia-specific predictive models that incorporate clinical and laboratory parameters to better stratify risk and guide management (1,7). Owattanapanich W. and his colleagues designed a new Siriraj Acute Myeloid/Lymphoblastic Leukemia (SiAML) bleeding and thrombosis scoring system for thrombohemorrhagic complications in newly diagnosed acute leukemia. They reported that this score might be valuable for prognosticating individuals at risk for bleeding and thrombotic complications. However, several limitations were identified: the small sample size, especially for APL cases, prevented analysis by leukemia subtype and may have led to underreporting of thrombohemorrhagic events. The retrospective design also resulted in missing patient data. Lastly, external validation in diverse populations is needed to confirm the accuracy of the scoring systems (7). Therefore, in our study, we aim to extend the previous work by including two additional scores: the ISTH-BAT and the Khorana score. We will compare the sensitivity and specificity of the ISTH-BAT, ISTH-DIC, Khorana, and siAML scores in relation to hemorrhagic and thrombotic complications in patients with acute leukemia. Our study also seeks to validate the clinical utility and accuracy of these scores in predicting both types of complications across all subtypes of acute leukemia, to make sure that analysis of all subtypes will be performed. Furthermore, by adopting a prospective design, we aim to minimize missing data and enhance the reliability of our findings.

Trial Health

65
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
4mo left

Started Sep 2025

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress74%
Sep 2025Dec 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 31, 2025

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 7, 2025

Completed
25 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2025

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2026

Expected
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2026

Last Updated

August 7, 2025

Status Verified

July 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

July 31, 2025

Last Update Submit

August 6, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • the accuracy of the newly proposed SiAML score

    To validate the clinical accuracy of the newly proposed SiAML score in predicting both bleeding and thrombotic complications in patients with Acute Leukemia .

    6 months

  • the accuracy of the newly proposed SiAML score

    To validate the clinical utility and ensure the accuracy of the newly proposed SiAML score in predicting both bleeding and thrombotic complications in patients with Acute Leukemia .

    baseline

Study Arms (1)

study group

patient with Acute Myeloid/Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Newly diagnosed patients with acute leukemia

You may qualify if:

  • Newly diagnosed patients with acute leukemia, including: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) Acute myeloid leukemia (AML)

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with a known history of familial thrombophilia.
  • Patients who received antiplatelet or anticoagulant agents prior to the diagnosis of acute leukemia.
  • Patients who complained of bleeding related to any coagulation disorders

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Residant doctor at Assiut university hospital

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 31, 2025

First Posted

August 7, 2025

Study Start

September 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Last Updated

August 7, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-07