Alternative to Gait Speed in Sarcopenia Assessment
The Reliability of the Elbow Isotonic Contraction Test as an Alternative to the Gait Speed Test in Assessing Sarcopenia Severity
1 other identifier
observational
96
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to assess the reliability of the Elbow Performance Test as an upper extremity-based alternative for evaluating sarcopenia severity. Unlike traditional lower extremity-focused assessments, this test may offer a practical solution for individuals with mobility limitations or comorbidities affecting the lower limbs. Participants will include older adults with sarcopenia and healthy young adults. Functional tests, including the 4-meter Gait Speed Test, SPPB, TUG, and the Elbow Performance Test, will be administered twice within a 7-10-day interval. Reliability will be analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Apr 2025
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 3, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 15, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 27, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 27, 2025
CompletedJuly 30, 2025
July 1, 2025
4 months
July 3, 2025
July 27, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
the Elbow Performance Test
The total time required to complete thirty consecutive elbow flexion-extension movements, performed with a one-kilogram sandbag attached to the distal forearm of the dominant arm.
Two assessment sessions conducted seven to ten days apart to evaluate test-retest reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC).
Secondary Outcomes (3)
the 4-meter Gait Speed Test
Two assessment sessions conducted seven to ten days apart to evaluate test-retest reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC).
the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)
Two assessment sessions conducted seven to ten days apart to evaluate test-retest reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC).
Timed Up and Go (TUG)
Two assessment sessions conducted seven to ten days apart to evaluate test-retest reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC).
Study Arms (2)
Group 1
older adults with sarcopenia
Group 2
healthy young adults
Interventions
All participants underwent the 4-meter Gait Speed Test, the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, and the Elbow Performance Test twice, with a 7-10-day interval between sessions. In the Elbow Performance Test, a 1-kilogram sandbag was fixed to the distal forearm of the dominant arm, and participants were asked to perform 30 consecutive elbow flexion-extension movements.
Eligibility Criteria
Sarcopenia Group and Healthy Young Control Group
You may qualify if:
- Individuals who consent to participate in the study
- \*Sarcopenia Group
- Male participants aged 60 years or older
- Diagnosed with sarcopenia according to EWGSOP2 criteria
- \*Healthy Young Control Group
- Male participants aged 40 years or younger
- SARC-F screening test score \< 4
You may not qualify if:
- Inability to cooperate
- Poor general condition due to acute medical problems
- Chronic decompensated cardiac, renal, or hepatic failure
- Presence of rheumatologic, psychiatric, or neurological disorders
- Use of performance-enhancing or fatigue-reducing medications
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Istanbul Physical Medicine Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospital
Istanbul, 31180, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (4)
Bahat G, Tufan A, Tufan F, Kilic C, Akpinar TS, Kose M, Erten N, Karan MA, Cruz-Jentoft AJ. Cut-off points to identify sarcopenia according to European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) definition. Clin Nutr. 2016 Dec;35(6):1557-1563. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.02.002. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
PMID: 26922142BACKGROUNDPower GA, Dalton BH, Rice CL. Human neuromuscular structure and function in old age: A brief review. J Sport Health Sci. 2013 Dec;2(4):215-226. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2013.07.001.
PMID: 27011872BACKGROUNDKaracan I, Turker KS. Exploring neuronal mechanisms of osteosarcopenia in older adults. J Physiol. 2024 Aug 9. doi: 10.1113/JP285666. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 39119811BACKGROUNDCruz-Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J, Boirie Y, Bruyere O, Cederholm T, Cooper C, Landi F, Rolland Y, Sayer AA, Schneider SM, Sieber CC, Topinkova E, Vandewoude M, Visser M, Zamboni M; Writing Group for the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People 2 (EWGSOP2), and the Extended Group for EWGSOP2. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing. 2019 Jan 1;48(1):16-31. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afy169.
PMID: 30312372BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
İlhan Karacan, Prof.
Istanbul Physical Medicine Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- M.D.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 3, 2025
First Posted
July 15, 2025
Study Start
April 1, 2025
Primary Completion
July 27, 2025
Study Completion
July 27, 2025
Last Updated
July 30, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share