NCT07009275

Brief Summary

This study aims to improve nursing students' skills in measuring vital signs using a 3D animation-based game simulation. Measuring vital signs is a key responsibility for nurses and requires both knowledge and hands-on practice. To help students learn without risking patient safety, we developed an educational game that uses 3D animation technology. A total of 73 nursing students participated in this randomized controlled study. One group used the 3D game simulation, while the other group received traditional teaching. We compared students' test scores, their satisfaction with the learning method, and their confidence in what they learned.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
73

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2023

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 25, 2023

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 12, 2023

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 10, 2023

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 20, 2025

Completed
17 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 6, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

June 6, 2025

Status Verified

May 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

May 20, 2025

Last Update Submit

May 29, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

nursing educationvital signsanimationacademic acheivementsatisfaction

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Academic Achievement Test of Vital Sings Measurement Skills

    The researchers developed the Academic Achievement Test of Vital Signs Measurement Skills to measure vital signs. The researchers first identified the gains that students should make in measuring vital signs. In line with the literature \[6, 12, 13\], five-choice multiple-choice questions were prepared covering the goals and behaviours determined for each outcome. A total of 58 questions, including 23 questions on blood pressure measurement skills, 12 questions on apical pressure measurement skills, 10 questions on body temperature measurement skills, 7 questions on pulse taking skills, and 6 questions on respiration counting skills, were submitted for expert opinion by email. The questions were rearranged according to the experts' feedback. The questions were administered to 303 nursing students and a pretest was conducted. Question items were analysed and validity and reliability analyses of the questions were performed. In the final stage, inappropriate questions were removed.

    From enrollment to the end of implementation at 4 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale

    From enrollment to the end of implementation at 4 weeks.

Study Arms (2)

Intervention group

EXPERIMENTAL

The intervention group consisted of students using the game-based simulation application developed using 3D animation technology.

Other: The game-based simulation application developed using 3D animation technology

Control group

NO INTERVENTION

Interventions

The intervention group consisted of students using the game-based simulation application developed using 3D animation technology, while the control group consisted of students using traditional learning methods.

Intervention group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Being enrolled as a student in the Faculty of Nursing,
  • Voluntarily agreeing to participate in the study,
  • Not having previously received theoretical and practical training on vital signs,
  • Not being an international student,
  • Not having transferred to the Faculty of Nursing from other health sciences programs with different educational or assessment practices.

You may not qualify if:

  • Not being enrolled in the Faculty of Nursing,
  • Refusing to participate or withdrawing consent,
  • Having prior theoretical or practical education related to vital signs,
  • Being an international student,
  • Having transferred from other health sciences programs that use different clinical or educational evaluation systems.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Kocaeli University

İzmit, Kocaeli, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (23)

  • Yılmaz D, Çınar G. The effect of simulator use in blood pressure measurement training on nursing students' psychomotor skills. Sağlık ve Toplum Dergisi. 2020;20(1):104-10

    BACKGROUND
  • Bayram SB, Caliskan N. The use of virtual reality simulations in nursing education, and patient safety. Contemporary Topics in Patient Safety-Volume 1: IntechOpen; 2020

    BACKGROUND
  • Luctkar-Flude M, Tyerman J, Tregunno D, Bell C, Lalonde M, McParland T, et al. Designing a virtual simulation game as presimulation preparation for a respiratory distress simulation for senior nursing students: Usability, feasibility, and perceived impact on learning. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2021;52:35-42

    BACKGROUND
  • Bayram ŞB, Çalışkan N. Using a game-based virtual reality application in psychomotor skills acquisition: An experience sharing Journal of Human Sciences. 2019;16(1):155-63

    BACKGROUND
  • Verkuyl M, Hughes M. Virtual gaming simulation in nursing education: A mixed-methods study. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2019;29:9-14

    BACKGROUND
  • Atthill S, Witmer D, Luctkar-Flude M, Tyerman J. Exploring the impact of a virtual asynchronous debriefing method after a virtual simulation game to support clinical decision-making. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2021;50:10-8

    BACKGROUND
  • Şahin G, Başak T. Game-based learning in nursing education. Gümüşhane University Journal of Health Sciences. 2019;8(3):308-14

    BACKGROUND
  • Mohammed QH. Knowledge and practices of nursing college student's regarding blood pressure measurement in Hospitals at Kirkuk City. Kufa Journal for Nursing Sciences. 2016;6(2):177-84

    BACKGROUND
  • Özsaban A, Turan N, Beki Ç, Aşti T. The relationship between nurses' attitudes toward vital signs monitoring and emotional ıntelligence levels. Genel Tıp Dergisi. 2022;32(6):652-7

    BACKGROUND
  • Kısacık ÖG, Gündoğan AÖ, Yılmaz E. Attitudes of Nurses and Nursing Students Towards Vital Signs: A Comparatıve Study. Journal of Nursing Effect. 2024;17(4):575-90

    BACKGROUND
  • Gülnar E, Yılmaz ED, Özveren H. Hemşirelerin yaşam bulgularina ilişkin tutum ve uygulamalarinin belirlenmesi. Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi. 2020;22(3):377-85

    BACKGROUND
  • Öztürk D, Göçmen Baykara Z. The effect of peer education on the teaching of nursing skills. Journal of Education and Research in Nursing. 2019;16(4):295-300

    BACKGROUND
  • Foronda CL, Fernandez-Burgos M, Nadeau C, Kelley CN, Henry MN. Virtual Simulation in Nursing Education: A Systematic Review Spanning 1996 to 2018. Simul Healthc. 2020 Feb;15(1):46-54. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000411.

    PMID: 32028447BACKGROUND
  • Ordu Y, Caliskan N. The effect of virtual game simulation on students' perception of nursing diagnosis and clinical practice: Post-test only randomized controlled trial. Nurse Educ Pract. 2023 Oct;72:103792. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103792. Epub 2023 Sep 26.

    PMID: 37769493BACKGROUND
  • Carrero-Planells A, Pol-Castaneda S, Alamillos-Guardiola MC, Prieto-Alomar A, Tomas-Sanchez M, Moreno-Mulet C. Students and teachers' satisfaction and perspectives on high-fidelity simulation for learning fundamental nursing procedures: A mixed-method study. Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Sep;104:104981. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104981. Epub 2021 May 25.

    PMID: 34062333BACKGROUND
  • Alshehry AS, Cruz JP, Bashtawi MA, Almutairi KO, Tumala RB. Nursing Students' Knowledge, Competence and Attitudes towards Vital Signs Monitoring during Clinical Practice. J Clin Nurs. 2021 Mar;30(5-6):664-675. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15586. Epub 2020 Dec 16.

    PMID: 33259648BACKGROUND
  • Connor N, McArthur D, Camargo Plazas P. Reflections on vital sign measurement in nursing practice. Nurs Philos. 2021 Jan;22(1):e12326. doi: 10.1111/nup.12326. Epub 2020 Oct 1.

    PMID: 33001547BACKGROUND
  • Gillan PC, Delaney LJ, Tutticci N, Johnston S. Factors influencing nursing students' ability to recognise and respond to simulated patient deterioration: A scoping review. Nurse Educ Pract. 2022 Jul;62:103350. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103350. Epub 2022 Apr 20.

    PMID: 35468343BACKGROUND
  • Kellett J, Sebat F. Make vital signs great again - A call for action. Eur J Intern Med. 2017 Nov;45:13-19. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2017.09.018. Epub 2017 Sep 20.

    PMID: 28941841BACKGROUND
  • Mok W, Wang W, Cooper S, Ang EN, Liaw SY. Attitudes towards vital signs monitoring in the detection of clinical deterioration: scale development and survey of ward nurses. Int J Qual Health Care. 2015 Jun;27(3):207-13. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzv019. Epub 2015 Apr 16.

    PMID: 25888564BACKGROUND
  • Kamio T, Kajiwara A, Iizuka Y, Shiotsuka J, Sanui M. Frequency of vital sign measurement among intubated patients in the general ward and nurses' attitudes toward vital sign measurement. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2018 Oct 15;11:575-581. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S179033. eCollection 2018.

    PMID: 30410344BACKGROUND
  • Eyikara E, Baykara ZG. Effect of simulation on the ability of first year nursing students to learn vital signs. Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Jan;60:101-106. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.09.023. Epub 2017 Oct 13.

    PMID: 29078202BACKGROUND
  • Tanrikulu F, Gundogdu H, Erol F, Dikmen Y. A comparison of 3D game-based simulation versus traditional methods in vital signs education. BMC Med Educ. 2025 Oct 2;25(1):1344. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07980-4.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Personal Satisfaction

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavior

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: A randomized controlled experimental design
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Dr.

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 20, 2025

First Posted

June 6, 2025

Study Start

January 25, 2023

Primary Completion

May 12, 2023

Study Completion

September 10, 2023

Last Updated

June 6, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations