High-Fidelity Simulation Training: A Mixed Method Study
Approach to the Coronavirus With Patient With High-Fidelity Simulation Training: A Mixed Method Study
1 other identifier
interventional
52
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare in describe first-year nursing students' skills. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Are nursing students who perform the simulation practice with the scenario-based high-fidelity simulation manikin higher than those who perform the practice with the standard demonstration method?
- Are the satisfaction levels of nursing students who perform the simulation practice with the scenario-based high-fidelity simulation manikin higher than those who perform the practice with the standard demonstration method? Researchers will compare two groups of nursing students training with high-fidelity simulation manikin and training with standard demonstration method.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started May 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 15, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 15, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 25, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 17, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 29, 2022
CompletedNovember 29, 2022
November 1, 2022
1 month
October 17, 2022
November 21, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Assessing nursing students of skills in wearing-removing personal protective equipment
Procedural Steps Checklist was used to assess nursing wearing-removing skills. The checklist for PPE wearing-removal skills was created by the researchers based on their review of the relevant literature (Göçmen Baykara et al. 2020; Patricia Potter et al. 2020; World Health Organization 2021). Opinions were received from five faculty members with expertise in Fundamentals of Nursing for the checklist, and Kendall's W coefficient for the checklist was found as 0.776 (p \< .001). The Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the checklist was calculated as 0.64, which showed a moderate level of internal consistency. The checklist to be used for assessment was finalized, and it consisted of 17 items. Each item was scored as 0 or 1, and the minimum and maximum total scores of the checklist were 0 and 17. When the participant performed the procedural step, they received 1 point for the related item, while they received 0 points when they failed to perform the step.
1 month
Describing nursing students of satisfaction levels
VAS was used to determine which model was more satisfactory to nursing students. VAS was used to measure the satisfaction levels of the participants based on their own assessment between "0 (not satisfied at all) and 10 (very satisfied)".
1 month
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Establish fear of COVID-19 levels of nursing students
Through study completion, an average of 1 month
Study Arms (2)
Intervention
EXPERIMENTALIn the process of teaching personnel protective equipment (PPE) use with the scenario-based high-fidelity simulation mannikin, a simulation application was made with 26 students. The simulation scenario was implemented with 13 groups consisting of 3 students each playing different roles (nurse, head nurse, patient relative). Throughout the scenario, the students who played the role of the nurse and the head nurse simulated the PPE wearing-removal practice in a way to cover all steps of the process (preparation, implementation, and evaluation). During the implementation of the scenario, the student playing the role of the patient's relative provided guiding clues to the nurse when needed. Debriefing was started right after the simulation. Frequency of administration the implementation of each group is once and the debriefing stage where the learning process was reinforced and lasted 30 minutes.
Control
OTHERThe 26 students who constituted the control group performed the personnel protective equipment (PPE) wearing-removal practice once under the supervision of the researcher at the Fundamentals of Nursing skills laboratory. Frequency of administration the implementation of each group is once. The students applied experiential learning principles through active experience and reflective observation.
Interventions
A high-fidelity simulator was developed to teach skills in nursing education, and it is sized to represent an adult male patient. The mannequin can be controlled using a computer program, it can breathe, and its vital signs can be monitored using a bedside monitor.
Training for 26 nursing students who constituted the control group performed personnel protective equipment (PPE) wearing-removal practice
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- First-year nursing students
- Not have been trained in simulation before
- Taking a nursing fundamentals course for the first time
- Open to communication and volunteering to be involved in the study
You may not qualify if:
- Not volunteering to participate in the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Sakarya University
Sakarya, 54050, Turkey (TĂ¼rkiye)
Related Publications (24)
Koukourikos K, Tsaloglidou A, Kourkouta L, Papathanasiou IV, Iliadis C, Fratzana A, Panagiotou A. Simulation in Clinical Nursing Education. Acta Inform Med. 2021 Mar;29(1):15-20. doi: 10.5455/aim.2021.29.15-20.
PMID: 34012208BACKGROUNDAhorsu DK, Lin CY, Imani V, Saffari M, Griffiths MD, Pakpour AH. The Fear of COVID-19 Scale: Development and Initial Validation. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2022;20(3):1537-1545. doi: 10.1007/s11469-020-00270-8. Epub 2020 Mar 27.
PMID: 32226353BACKGROUNDKuru Alici N, Ozturk Copur E. Anxiety and fear of COVID-19 among nursing students during the COVID-19 pandemic: A descriptive correlation study. Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2022 Jan;58(1):141-148. doi: 10.1111/ppc.12851. Epub 2021 May 20.
PMID: 34018195BACKGROUNDAlsolais A, Alquwez N, Alotaibi KA, Alqarni AS, Almalki M, Alsolami F, Almazan J, Cruz JP. Risk perceptions, fear, depression, anxiety, stress and coping among Saudi nursing students during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Ment Health. 2021 Apr;30(2):194-201. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2021.1922636. Epub 2021 May 12.
PMID: 33978543BACKGROUNDApisarnthanarak A, Apisarnthanarak P, Siripraparat C, Saengaram P, Leeprechanon N, Weber DJ. Impact of anxiety and fear for COVID-19 toward infection control practices among Thai healthcare workers. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2020 Sep;41(9):1093-1094. doi: 10.1017/ice.2020.280. Epub 2020 Jun 8. No abstract available.
PMID: 32507115BACKGROUNDBakioglu F, Korkmaz O, Ercan H. Fear of COVID-19 and Positivity: Mediating Role of Intolerance of Uncertainty, Depression, Anxiety, and Stress. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2021;19(6):2369-2382. doi: 10.1007/s11469-020-00331-y. Epub 2020 May 28.
PMID: 32837421BACKGROUNDBasak T, Unver V, Moss J, Watts P, Gaioso V. Beginning and advanced students' perceptions of the use of low- and high-fidelity mannequins in nursing simulation. Nurse Educ Today. 2016 Jan;36:37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2015.07.020. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
PMID: 26282193BACKGROUNDBouchoucha SL, Phillips NM, Lucas J, Kilpatrick M, Hutchinson A. An investigation into nursing students' application of infection prevention and control precautions. Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Sep;104:104987. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104987. Epub 2021 May 29.
PMID: 34098422BACKGROUNDCampanati FLDS, Ribeiro LM, Silva ICRD, Hermann PRS, Brasil GDC, Carneiro KKG, Funghetto SS. Clinical simulation as a Nursing Fundamentals teaching method: a quasi-experimental study. Rev Bras Enferm. 2021 Oct 18;75(2):e20201155. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2020-1155. eCollection 2021. English, Portuguese.
PMID: 34669900BACKGROUNDCheng A, Kessler D, Mackinnon R, Chang TP, Nadkarni VM, Hunt EA, Duval-Arnould J, Lin Y, Cook DA, Pusic M, Hui J, Moher D, Egger M, Auerbach M; International Network for Simulation-based Pediatric Innovation, Research, and Education (INSPIRE) Reporting Guidelines Investigators. Reporting guidelines for health care simulation research: extensions to the CONSORT and STROBE statements. Adv Simul (Lond). 2016 Jul 25;1:25. doi: 10.1186/s41077-016-0025-y. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 29449994BACKGROUNDDriscoll B, Evans D. Nursing Infection Control Practice Adherence, Related Barriers, and Methods of Intervention. J Nurs Adm. 2022 Mar 1;52(3):132-137. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000001120.
PMID: 35170577BACKGROUNDElo S, Kyngas H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008 Apr;62(1):107-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x.
PMID: 18352969BACKGROUNDEyikara E, Baykara ZG. Effect of simulation on the ability of first year nursing students to learn vital signs. Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Jan;60:101-106. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.09.023. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
PMID: 29078202BACKGROUNDFawaz MA, Hamdan-Mansour AM. Impact of high-fidelity simulation on the development of clinical judgment and motivation among Lebanese nursing students. Nurse Educ Today. 2016 Nov;46:36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.08.026. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
PMID: 27591378BACKGROUNDGraneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004 Feb;24(2):105-12. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001.
PMID: 14769454BACKGROUNDLei YY, Zhu L, Sa YTR, Cui XS. Effects of high-fidelity simulation teaching on nursing students' knowledge, professional skills and clinical ability: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Nurse Educ Pract. 2022 Mar;60:103306. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103306. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
PMID: 35202957BACKGROUNDMedina Fernandez IA, Carreno Moreno S, Chaparro Diaz L, Gallegos-Torres RM, Medina Fernandez JA, Hernandez Martinez EK. Fear, Stress, and Knowledge regarding COVID-19 in Nursing Students and Recent Graduates in Mexico. Invest Educ Enferm. 2021 Feb;39(1):e05. doi: 10.17533/udea.iee.v39n1e05.
PMID: 33687809BACKGROUNDNajjar RH, Lyman B, Miehl N. Nursing students' experiences with high-fidelity simulation. Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2015 Mar 19;12:/j/ijnes.2015.12.issue-1/ijnes-2015-0010/ijnes-2015-0010.xml. doi: 10.1515/ijnes-2015-0010.
PMID: 25803087BACKGROUNDPadilha JM, Machado PP, Ribeiro A, Ramos J, Costa P. Clinical Virtual Simulation in Nursing Education: Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2019 Mar 18;21(3):e11529. doi: 10.2196/11529.
PMID: 30882355BACKGROUNDPol-Castaneda S, Carrero-Planells A, Moreno-Mulet C. Use of simulation to improve nursing students' medication administration competence: a mixed-method study. BMC Nurs. 2022 May 16;21(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-00897-z.
PMID: 35578199BACKGROUNDTabah A, Ramanan M, Laupland KB, Buetti N, Cortegiani A, Mellinghoff J, Conway Morris A, Camporota L, Zappella N, Elhadi M, Povoa P, Amrein K, Vidal G, Derde L, Bassetti M, Francois G, Ssi Yan Kai N, De Waele JJ; PPE-SAFE contributors. Personal protective equipment and intensive care unit healthcare worker safety in the COVID-19 era (PPE-SAFE): An international survey. J Crit Care. 2020 Oct;59:70-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.06.005. Epub 2020 Jun 13.
PMID: 32570052BACKGROUNDVerbeek JH, Rajamaki B, Ijaz S, Sauni R, Toomey E, Blackwood B, Tikka C, Ruotsalainen JH, Kilinc Balci FS. Personal protective equipment for preventing highly infectious diseases due to exposure to contaminated body fluids in healthcare staff. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 15;4(4):CD011621. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011621.pub4.
PMID: 32293717BACKGROUNDWatson C, Gomez-Ibanez R, Granel N, Bernabeu-Tamayo MD. Nursing students first experience on high fidelity simulation: A phenomenological research study. Nurse Educ Pract. 2021 Aug;55:103162. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103162. Epub 2021 Jul 23.
PMID: 34332280BACKGROUNDYu M, Yang MR. Effectiveness and Utility of Virtual Reality Infection Control Simulation for Children With COVID-19: Quasi-Experimental Study. JMIR Serious Games. 2022 May 27;10(2):e36707. doi: 10.2196/36707.
PMID: 35575818BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 17, 2022
First Posted
November 29, 2022
Study Start
May 15, 2022
Primary Completion
June 15, 2022
Study Completion
August 25, 2022
Last Updated
November 29, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Planning to make a manuscript for this study and sharing participant identification information and outcomes.