Evaluation of Daily Disposable Toric Soft Lenses Manufactured With an Alternative Hydration Process
1 other identifier
interventional
281
1 country
20
Brief Summary
This is a prospective, multi-site, dispensing, randomized, controlled, double-masked, bilateral wear, 2x2 crossover study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the test lens.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
20 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 22, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 25, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 13, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 14, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 14, 2025
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 15, 2026
CompletedSeptember 28, 2026
September 1, 2026
3 months
April 22, 2025
July 10, 2026
September 24, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Distance Monocular logMAR Visual Acuity
Distance Monocular visual acuity was measured on a logMAR (Logarithm of Minimal Angle of Resolution) scale under high luminance high contrast condition. Visual acuity is assessed using ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) charts. Letter-by-letter results calculated the visual performance score for each chart read. LogMAR scores closer to zero, or below zero, indicate better visual acuity. A logMAR visual performance score of 0.0 is equivalent to Snellen visual acuity of 20/20.
1-Week Follow-up
Proportion of Eyes With Absolute Rotation Less Than or Equal to 10 Degrees
Absolute rotation was assessed for each subject eye using a slit lamp 15 minutes after lens insertion. Acceptable absolute rotation was dichotomized into a binary response where Y=1 if absolute rotation was less than or equal to 10 degrees and Y=0 otherwise (absolute rotation greater than 10 degrees). The proportion of eyes with absolute rotation less than or equal to 10 degrees was reported for each lens.
15-Minutes after Lens Insertion
Proportion of Eyes With Rotational Stability Less Than or Equal to 5 Degrees
Rotational Stability was assessed for each subject eye using a slit lamp 15 minutes after lens insertion. Rotational Stability was dichotomized into a binary response where Y=1 if Rotational Stability was less than or equal to 5 degrees and Y=0 otherwise (Rotational Stability greater than 5 degrees). The proportion of eyes with Rotational Stability less than or equal to 5 degrees was reported for each lens.
15-minutes after lens insertion
Proportion of Eyes With Grade 3 or Higher Slit Lamp Findings
Slit Lamp Findings (SLF) were assessed using a biomicroscope and were graded using the FDA grading scale (Grade: 0, 1,2, 3 and 4) with grade 0 represents the absence of findings and 1 to 4 representing successively worse findings (i.e. Grade 1 = trace, Grade 2 = Mild, Grade 3 = moderate and Grade 4 = severe). This was performed on each subject eye at every study visit (baseline, unscheduled visits and 1-week follow-up). The data was then dichotomized into two groups. Those with grade 3 or higher and those with grade 2 or lower. The proportion of eyes with SLF with grade 3 or higher was reported for each lens.
Up to 1-Week Follow-up
Proportion of Eyes With Acceptable Lens Fitting
Contact lens fitting acceptance was assessed for each subject eye using a biomicroscope post lens insertion at the 1-week follow-up. Lens fit was a binary variable where acceptable lens fit=1 and unacceptable lens fit=0. The proportion of eyes with acceptable lens fit was reported for each lens.
Up to 1-Week Follow-up
Secondary Outcomes (3)
CLUE Vision Score
1-Week Follow-up
CLUE Comfort Score
1-Week Follow-up
CLUE Handling Score
1-Week Follow-up
Study Arms (2)
Test/Control
EXPERIMENTALEligible subjects will be randomized to the Test/Control sequence, to wear the Test Lens followed by the Control Lens bilaterally for approximately 1-week each in a daily disposable modality with a washout period of approximately 1-week between wear periods.
Control/Test
EXPERIMENTALEligible subjects will be randomized to the Control/Test sequence, to wear the Control Lens followed by the Test Lens bilaterally for approximately 1-week each in a daily disposable modality with a washout period of approximately 1-week between wear periods.
Interventions
Control Lens
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (20)
James R. Dugue, Optometrist
Mission Viejo, California, 92691, United States
Scripps Poway Eyecare & Optometry
San Diego, California, 92131, United States
Stam & Associates Eye Care
Jacksonville, Florida, 32256, United States
Pearson Research Center PA
Longwood, Florida, 32779, United States
Maitland Vision Centers - North Orlando Ave
Maitland, Florida, 32751, United States
Mid-State Eye
Clinton, Illinois, 61727, United States
Franklin Park Eye Center, P.C.
Franklin Park, Illinois, 60131, United States
Kannarr Eye Care - 101 North Broadway
Pittsburg, Kansas, 66762, United States
Complete Eye Care of Medina
Medina, Minnesota, 55340, United States
Advanced Eyecare - Raytown, MO
Raytown, Missouri, 64133, United States
The Koetting Associates
St Louis, Missouri, 63144, United States
ABQ Eye Care
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87109, United States
Spectrum Eye Care
Jamestown, New York, 14750, United States
Sacco Eye Group
Vestal, New York, 13850, United States
ProCare Vision Centers
Granville, Ohio, 43023, United States
Professional Vision Care Inc. - Westerville
Westerville, Ohio, 43081, United States
Optometry Group, PLLC
Memphis, Tennessee, 38111, United States
Total Eye Care
Memphis, Tennessee, 38119, United States
Tyler Eye Associates
Tyler, Texas, 75703, United States
Clarke EyeCare Center
Wichita Falls, Texas, 76308, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Study Contact - JJVC
- Organization
- Johnson & Johnson Vision Care
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. Clinical Trial
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 22, 2025
First Posted
May 13, 2025
Study Start
April 25, 2025
Primary Completion
July 14, 2025
Study Completion
July 14, 2025
Last Updated
September 28, 2026
Results First Posted
September 15, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
Johnson \& Johnson Medical Device Companies have an agreement with the Yale Open Data Access (YODA) to serve as the independent review panel for evaluation of requests for clinical study reports and participant level data from investigators and physicians for scientific research that will advance medical knowledge and public health. Requests for access to the study data can be submitted through the YODA Project site at http://yoda.yale.edu