Performance of Fanfilcon A Toric Lenses After at Least One Month Wearing Enfilcon A Toric Lenses
1 other identifier
interventional
37
1 country
4
Brief Summary
This is a prospective, multi-center, subject-masked, bilateral, daily wear, two-month dispensing study
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2016
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 29, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 3, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 21, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 13, 2018
CompletedApril 10, 2018
March 1, 2018
4 months
September 29, 2016
December 22, 2017
March 13, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Visual Acuity
High contrast distance visual acuity is measured by LogMAR.
baseline, 2 weeks, 1 month
Centration
Lens centration is assessed (optimum, decentration acceptable, decentration unacceptable).
baseline, 2 weeks, 1 month
Corneal Coverage
Corneal coverage will be assessed (yes/no)
baseline, 2 weeks, 1 month
Post-blink Movement
Post-blink lens movement assessed using the following evaluations (0-4): 0=Insufficient, unacceptable, 1=Minimal, acceptable, 2=Optimal, 3=Moderate, acceptable, 4=Excessive, unacceptable)
baseline, 2 weeks, 1 month
Fit Acceptability
Investigator fit acceptability for each lens pair. Scale 0-4: (0=should not be worn, 1=borderline but unacceptable, 2=minimally acceptable, early review, 3=not perfect but OK to dispense, 4=perfect)
baseline, 2 weeks, 1 month
Study Arms (2)
enfilcon A (habitual)
NO INTERVENTIONAll participants wear enfilcon A toric lens (habitual) and then refitted with fanfilcon A toric lenses.
fanfilcon A
ACTIVE COMPARATORAll participants wear enfilcon A toric lens (habitual) and then refitted with fanfilcon A toric lenses.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Is between 18 and 40 years of age (inclusive)
- Has had a self-reported eye exam in the last two years
- Is a habitual soft toric lens wearer
- Can be successfully fit with study lenses (≥ grade 2 fit acceptance)
- Has a contact lens spherical prescription between -1.00 to -6.00D with a cylinder between -0.75 and -1.75D (Diopters) (inclusive)
- Has a spectacle cylinder of at least 0.75D in each eye.
- Can achieve best corrected spectacle refraction distance visual acuity of 20/25 (0.10 logMAR) or better in each eye.
- Can achieve a distance visual acuity of 20/30 (0.18 logMAR) or better in each eye with the study contact lenses.
- Has clear corneas and no active ocular disease
- Has read, understood and signed the information consent letter
- Has a contact lens refraction that fits within the available parameters of the study lenses
- Is willing to comply with the wear schedule (at least 5 days per week, \> 8 hours/day assuming there are no contraindications for doing so)
- Is willing to comply with the visit schedule.
You may not qualify if:
- A person will be excluded from the study if he/she:
- Has a history of not achieving comfortable CL (Contact Lens) wear (5 days per week; \> 8 hours/day)
- Presents with clinically significant anterior segment abnormalities
- Presents with ocular or systemic disease or need of medications which might interfere with contact lens wear
- Presents with slit lamp findings that would contraindicate contact lens wear such as:
- Pathological dry eye or associated findings
- Significant pterygium, pinguecula, or corneal scars within the visual axis
- Neovascularization \> 0.75 mm in from of the limbus
- Anterior uveitis or iritis (or history in past year)
- Seborrheic eczema of eyelid region, Seborrheic conjunctivitis
- History of corneal ulcers or fungal infections
- Poor personal hygiene
- Has a known history of corneal hypoesthesia (reduced corneal sensitivity)
- Has aphakia, keratoconus or a highly irregular cornea.
- Has presbyopia or has dependence on spectacles for near work over the contact lenses.
- +3 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (4)
Hospital Contact Lens Service
Miami, Florida, 33136, United States
Debbie Kim
Closter, New Jersey, 07624, United States
West Village Eyecare
New York, New York, 10014, United States
Spokane Eye Clinic
Spokane, Washington, 99204, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Jose Vega, O.D., MSc., FAAO
- Organization
- CooperVision
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 29, 2016
First Posted
October 3, 2016
Study Start
October 1, 2016
Primary Completion
February 1, 2017
Study Completion
March 21, 2017
Last Updated
April 10, 2018
Results First Posted
March 13, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share