ERFs Game-based Assessment in AYAs: Validation of Game-based Assessment of Emotion Regulation Abilities
Validation of Game-based Assessment of Emotion Regulation Abilities Using the REThink Life Online Game in a Population of Adolescents and Young Adults
1 other identifier
interventional
230
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This activity will have the objective of establishing the validity of in-game emotion regulation abilities assessment for adolescents and young adults.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Feb 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 15, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 24, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 15, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2025
CompletedAugust 28, 2025
August 1, 2025
4 months
April 24, 2025
August 27, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Emotion regulation
The Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ-short) is an 18-item scale assessing nine different emotion regulation strategies, namely Self-blame, Other-blame, Rumination, Catastrophizing, Positive refocusing, Planning, Positive reappraisal, Putting into perspective and Acceptance. Children and adolescents were asked to express the frequency of using each strategy on a 5-point Likert-type scale, from 1 ("almost never") to 5 ("almost always"). Higher scores on adaptive strategies (e.g., positive reappraisal, refocus on planning, positive refocusing, putting into perspective, acceptance) are equivalent to a better outcome (more adaptive coping). Higher scores on maladaptive strategies (e.g., rumination, catastrophizing, self-blame, other-blame) are equivalent to worse outcomes (less adaptive coping).
Baseline
Behavioral difficulties
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a brief behavioural screening questionnaire for children aged 2 to 17 years old, encompassing emotional symptoms, conduct problems, hyperactivity/inattention, peer relationship problems, and prosocial behavior. Total difficulties score: Sum of all subscales except Prosocial → Range: 0 to 40. Prosocial score is reported separately → Range: 0 to 10. Higher scores on total difficulties and the four problem subscales are equivalent to worse outcomes. Higher scores on the prosocial subscale are equivalent to better outcomes.
Baseline
Stress
The Adolescent Stress Scale (ADOSS) will be used to capture students' level of stress in the following domains: personal, academic, family, and social. Total score ranges from 20 to 100, with higher scores indicating higher levels of stress.
Baseline
Study Arms (1)
REThink Life
OTHERThe participants will complete the scale measurements after receiving the four levels of the REThink Life game, each focusing on an emotion regulation skill and an associated assessment system.
Interventions
REThink Life is a therapeutic game developed by David and collaborators (2019) and it is composed of four levels, each training a different emotion regulation ability (emotion recognition, mindfulness, distinguishing between rational and irrational thoughts, and positive attention bias).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- adolescents and young adults with between 10 and 24 years old provided with written parental consent where applicable
You may not qualify if:
- intellectual disability or physical limitations precluded the use of the computer program
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Babes-Bolyai University
Cluj-Napoca, Cluj, 400015, Romania
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Oana A. David, Ph.D
Babes-Bolyai University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 24, 2025
First Posted
May 1, 2025
Study Start
February 15, 2025
Primary Completion
June 15, 2025
Study Completion
June 30, 2025
Last Updated
August 28, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share