Emotion Regulation For All (ER4ALL) Study
MASHUP1
A Pilot Feasibility Study for an Emotion Regulation Skills Training (ER4ALL) for Students in Higher Education
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In the present study, the investigators aim to examine the feasibility of a classroom-based emotion regulation skills training within a tertiary curriculum. The primary objective of this study is to assess the acceptability and feasibility of the "ER4ALL", a brief course for enhancing emotion regulation skills for students in higher education. The secondary objective of this study is to collect preliminary evidence for beneficial effects in increasing students' acquired knowledge on adaptive emotion regulation, thus improvement on general psychological wellbeing. A two-arm pilot RCT will be conducted in University of Cyprus.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 17, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 27, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 30, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 28, 2024
CompletedMarch 30, 2023
March 1, 2023
8 months
February 17, 2023
March 29, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Feasibility of the course
At post-training, principal researchers involved in the development and delivery of the intervention in each site, will complete Structured Assessment of FEasibility (SAFE; Bird et al. 2014), a standardised measure of the feasibility of complex interventions (Bird et al. 2014). The SAFE measure comprises 16 items grouped into two sub-scales: Blocks (8 items) and Enablers (8 items). SAFE guidelines recommend that reviewers attend to the individual items of the scale, instead of using summary scores, since items have unequal weight. Τhe tool has shown excellent interrater reliability (k = 0.84, 95% CI 0.79-0.89) and test-retest reliability (k = 0.89, 95% CI 0.85-0.93).
up to 10 weeks
Acceptability of the course
At post-training, all participants will complete a course satisfaction/acceptability questionnaire. The questionnaire will consist of two parts: In part A (quantitative) students will be asked several Likert-scale questions, while part B (qualitative) while contain open-ended response questions relating to their experience, satisfaction, and the challenges/enablers associated with design and implementation of the course. Qualitative data from open-ended questions will be considered alongside the quantitative measures to assess the feasibility of the intervention. The feasibility and acceptability of the intervention will be evaluated, using multiple primary endpoints such as: 1. Adherence (Total registrations, Attendance Rates, Homework Adherence, Dropouts) 2. Course acceptability and satisfaction ratings 3. Training preference.
up to 10 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Emotion Beliefs Questionnaire
up to 10 weeks
Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II
up to 10 weeks
Psyflex
up to 10 weeks
Positive Mental Health Scale (PMH-scale)
up to 10 weeks
Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21)
up to 10 weeks
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (2)
Participants characteristics
up to 10 weeks
Fidelity
up to 10 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Music-Based ER module
EXPERIMENTALThe program will involve the following modules: a) VALUES \& SETTING GOALS FOR ENHANCING MOTIVATION, b) MODULE 2. UNDERSTANDING EMOTIONS, c) MODULE 3. MINDFUL EMOTION AWARENESS AND RELAXATION, d) MODULE 4. THINKING FLEXIBLY, e) MODULE 5. COUNTERING INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIORS. The rationale of the training was built based on the framework of Unified Protocol (Barlow, et al. 2018) and training activities were selected and adapted from a compilation of foundational works on contemporary evidence-based approaches, (i.e. Cognitive Behavioral approach, Acceptance and Commitment approach, and Dialectical Behavior approach). Activities were adapted using core components of music-based interventions (Dingle \& Fay, 2016; McFerran, 2016; Saarikallio, 2019) with emphasis on emotion recognition in music, regulation of stress and negative emotions through active music listening, and self-reflective awareness of emotional responses to music.
Standard ER module
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants will receive the same training modules in the same chronological order as the music-based group. The only difference is that modules will be mainly text/language based (instead of using music methodologies).
Interventions
Each module contains a) the session outline, b) review of previous session's homework, c) theoretical background and module's rationale, d) skills activities, and e) homework assignment. Each group will attend five 1.5-hour sessions with their allocated instructor. Participants in both groups will receive the same training modules in the same chronological order. For consistency across modalities, participants will receive an instructor's manual containing the core material for facilitating the ER4ALL training, and a companion students' workbook with supporting information and activities.
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Cypruslead
- VU University of Amsterdamcollaborator
- University of Cretecollaborator
- Eotvos Lorand Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Cyprus
Nicosia, 1678, Cyprus
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr. Georgia Panayiotou, Professor of Clinical Psychology, Department of Psychology and Center for Applied Neuroscience
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 17, 2023
First Posted
February 27, 2023
Study Start
March 1, 2023
Primary Completion
October 30, 2023
Study Completion
February 28, 2024
Last Updated
March 30, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-03