A Randomised Controlled Trial to Compare Two Supraglottic Airway Devices (Ambu AuraGain vs Air Q-3) in Terms of Performance Characteristics.
A Comparative Study of Air-Q3 and Ambu AuraGain Supraglottic Airway Device in Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery Under General Anaesthesia: A Randomised Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
90
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A supraglottic airway device (SAD) functions as a temporary device to maintain the patency of airway during the administration of anaesthesia. The Ambu AuraGain (Ambu, Ballerup, Denmark) is a second generation SAD, since introduced in 2014, has been widely used in clinical practice. The Ambu AuraGain is an anatomically curved, single-use supraglottic airway device that features a port for orogastric tube insertion and it is a conduit for intubation as well. It is also associated with fast insertion times and high seal pressures. The Air-Q3, on the other hand, is relatively new SAD, however rather similar to Ambu AuraGain, it is also anatomically curved with a built-up mask heel for improved seal and it serves as a conduit for intubation as it features a unique endotracheal tube ramp and epiglottis elevator which aids in fast easy and safe intubation. It also features a port for orogastric tube insertion. Given the relatively recent introduction of the Air-Q3 into the market, there exists a paucity of comprehensive data regarding its efficacy. Meanwhile, the Ambu AuraGain stands as one of the most frequently utilised SAD, especially in our centre. This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the performance characteristics of the Ambu AuraGain and Air Q-3 in 90 patients undergoing surgery under general anaesthesia. The primary objective is to evaluate oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP), while secondary objectives includes time to insertion, first-pass success rate, ease of orogastric tube (OGT) insertion, laryngeal alignment using a fiberoptic scope, and incidence of postoperative complications.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 26, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 24, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 24, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 31, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 6, 2025
CompletedApril 9, 2025
March 1, 2025
6 months
March 31, 2025
April 5, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) of the Air-Q3 and Ambu AuraGain supraglottic airway device
After induction of general anaesthesia, either one supraglottic airway device will be inserted, Oropharyngeal leak pressure will be determined by transiently halting ventilation and closing the adjustable pressure limiting valve up to 30cmH2O with a fresh gas flow of 3L/min. The airway pressure at equilibrium or when audible air leak is heard from the throat is recorded.
After induction of general anaesthesia until successful insertion of supraglottic airway device
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Other performance characteristics in terms of time to insertion, first pass success rate, ease of orogastric tube (OGT) insertion.
After induction of anaesthesia until comfirmation of correct orogastric tube placement will be established through aspiration of gastric contents or epigastric auscultation
Laryngeal alignment using fibreoptic scope by employing the standardised scale developed by Brimacombe
After insertion of supraglottic airway device till performing fibreoptic scope assessment
Incidence of complications of using both SADs such as post operative sore throat
From extubation until full consciousness in recovery area
Study Arms (2)
Ambu AuraGain
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients in this group, once under general anaesthesia, will have this supraglottic airway device inserted to maintain airway patency and maintenance of general anaesthesia.
Air Q-3
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients in this group, once under general anaesthesia, will have this supraglottic airway device inserted to maintain airway patency and maintenance of general anaesthesia.
Interventions
Oropharyngeal leak pressure and other performance characteristics including time to insertion, first-pass success rate, ease of orogastric tube (OGT) insertion, laryngeal alignment using a fiberoptic scope, and incidence of postoperative sore throat.
Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure and other performance characteristics including time to insertion, first-pass success rate, ease of orogastric tube (OGT) insertion, laryngeal alignment using a fiberoptic scope, and incidence of postoperative sore throat.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients (age 18 to 65 years) of either sex, who are scheduled for an elective surgery under general anaesthesia
- Patients with ASA physical status of I or II.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with anticipated difficult airway (Airway Difficulty Score \>8)
- Patients with high risk of aspiration and regurgitation
- Patients with body mass index (BMI) \> 40kg/m2
- Patients who exhibit evidence of upper respiratory tract infection
- Patients with history of radiotherapy to the neck
- Patients who are pregnant
- Patients who are unable or unwilling to consent for the study
- Patients who are mentally challenged and unable to understand the study instructions
- Planned operating time more than 4 hours
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine
Kuala Lumpur, Selangor, 50603, Malaysia
Related Publications (7)
Gupta R, Mahajan R, Jatinder M, Gulati S, Mehta A, Nazir R. A comparison between ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and Air-Q Blocker in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Jul-Sep;35(3):340-347. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_397_17.
PMID: 31543582BACKGROUNDPreece G, Ng I, Lee K, Mezzavia P, Krieser R, Williams DL, Stewart O, Segal R. A randomised controlled trial comparing fibreoptic-guided tracheal intubation through two supraglottic devices: Ambu(R) AuraGain laryngeal mask and LMA(R) Fastrach. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2018 Sep;46(5):474-479. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1804600508.
PMID: 30189821BACKGROUNDSingh A, Bhalotra AR, Anand R. A comparative evaluation of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway, I-gel and Supreme laryngeal mask airway in adult patients undergoing elective surgery: A randomised trial. Indian J Anaesth. 2018 Nov;62(11):858-864. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_153_18.
PMID: 30532321BACKGROUNDShariffuddin II, Teoh WH, Tang E, Hashim N, Loh PS. Ambu(R) AuraGain versus LMA Supreme Second Seal: a randomised controlled trial comparing oropharyngeal leak pressures and gastric drain functionality in spontaneously breathing patients. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2017 Mar;45(2):244-250. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1704500215.
PMID: 28267947BACKGROUNDChe Omar S, Hardy Mohamad Zaini R, Fui Wong T, Nazaruddin W Hassan WM. Comparison of the Air-Q intubating laryngeal mask airway and the Ambu AuraGain laryngeal mask airway as a conduit for fibreoptic assisted endotracheal intubation for simulated cervical spine injury. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2021;53(3):241-245. doi: 10.5114/ait.2021.105759.
PMID: 34006053BACKGROUNDJindal S, Mittal A, Anand LK, Singh M, Kapoor D. Comparative evaluation of Air-Q blocker and Proseal laryngeal mask airway in patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia: A randomised controlled trial. Indian J Anaesth. 2021 Mar;65(Suppl 1):S20-S26. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_1254_20. Epub 2021 Mar 20.
PMID: 33814586BACKGROUNDBrimacombe J, Berry A. A proposed fiber-optic scoring system to standardize the assessment of laryngeal mask airway position. Anesth Analg. 1993 Feb;76(2):457. No abstract available.
PMID: 8424538BACKGROUND
Related Links
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Ina Ismiarti Shariffuddin, Clinical Professor
Univerisity Malaya
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Medical Doctor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 31, 2025
First Posted
April 6, 2025
Study Start
July 26, 2024
Primary Completion
January 24, 2025
Study Completion
January 24, 2025
Last Updated
April 9, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share