Comparing Between Air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway and Ambu® AuraGain™
Nira
Comparing the Effectiveness Between Air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway and Ambu® AuraGain™ Laryngeal Mask for Controlled Ventilation in Paediatric Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
1 other identifier
interventional
64
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this randomized study is conducted is to evaluate the performance and safety of air-Q intubating laryngeal airway as primary airway device in various short surgical procedure in children compared to Ambu® AuraGain™ Laryngeal Mask. Current Supraglottic airway devices (SADs) available in are classic LMA (cLMA), proseal LMA (pLMA), supreme LMA (sLMA) and the newer is Ambu® AuraGain™laryngeal mask. As variety of newer SADs for children have emerged since their introduction in clinical practice, hope the outcomes of this study it help advancing our knowledge and acumen in selecting appropriate devices for paediatric population.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2016
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 2, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 26, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2018
CompletedJune 1, 2018
May 1, 2018
1.6 years
April 2, 2017
May 31, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
measure fibreoptic (FO) grade of laryngeal view
Flexible fibreoptic scope is use to view anatomical alignment of the device to the larynx, 1cm proximal to the ventilating orifice
5 minutes after insertion of the device when good tidal volume is achieved
Secondary Outcomes (8)
oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP)
5 minutes after insertion of the device when good tidal volume is achieved
number of attempt
Throughout the insertion process up to 5 minutes post induction
Time of insertion
The time from which the device first being hold until successful insertion up to 5 minutes post induction
Blood pressure
Time from pre-induction until 5 minutes post insertion
Heart rate
Time from pre-induction until 5 minutes post insertion
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Ambu Aura Gain
EXPERIMENTALAmbu Aura Gain supraglottic airway size 2 or 2.5 will be inserted once patients are paralyzed
Air-Q
ACTIVE COMPARATORAir-Q supraglottic airway size 1.5 and 2.0will be inserted once the patients are paralyzed
Interventions
Anesthesia is induced with sevoflurane in oxygen. The anesthesia plane is gradually deepened by increasing the inspired concentration of sevoflurane (2-8%) till the loss of eyelash reflex. After intravenous (IV) cannula is inserted and intravenous fentanyl 1mcg/kg and rocuronium 0.6mg/kg are administered. Use of neuromuscular blocking agent is to minimize the risk of reflex activation of the airway. After 3 minutes, the appropriate size (depending upon body weight) of Ambu Aura Gain is lubricated with water soluble lubricant (KY jelly) is inserted by investigator based on manufacturer recommendation with the patient's head in neutral position. The cuff then is inflated to an intra-cuff pressure of 40 cm H20, measured using a digital cuff pressure monitor.
Anesthesia is induced with sevoflurane in oxygen. The anesthesia plane is gradually deepened by increasing the inspired concentration of sevoflurane (2-8%) till the loss of eyelash reflex. After intravenous (IV) cannula is inserted and intravenous fentanyl 1mcg/kg and rocuronium 0.6mg/kg are administered. Use of neuromuscular blocking agent is to minimize the risk of reflex activation of the airway. After 3 minutes, the appropriate size (depending upon body weight) of Air-Q supraglottic airway is lubricated with water soluble lubricant (KY jelly) is inserted by investigator based on manufacturer recommendation with the patient's head in neutral position. The cuff then is inflated to an intra-cuff pressure of 40 cm H20, measured using a digital cuff pressure monitor.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age between 1-6 years
- Weight 10-30kg
- American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) physical status class I and II
- Any surgical procedures where supraglottic airway (SGA) management is appropriate
- Duration of procedure within 2hours
You may not qualify if:
- Active respiratory infection
- Anticipated and known difficult airway
- Lung disease requiring high airway pressure
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Universiti Sains Malaysialead
- Ambu A/Scollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Science Malaysia Hospital
Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, 16150, Malaysia
Related Publications (4)
Darlong V, Biyani G, Baidya DK, Pandey R, Chandralekha, Punj J, Upadhyay AD. Comparison of air-Q and Ambu Aura-i for controlled ventilation in infants: a randomized controlled trial. Paediatr Anaesth. 2015 Aug;25(8):795-800. doi: 10.1111/pan.12663. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
PMID: 25917434RESULTDarlong V, Biyani G, Pandey R, Baidya DK, Punj Ca. Comparison of performance and efficacy of air-Q intubating laryngeal airway and flexible laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized and paralyzed infants and children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2014 Oct;24(10):1066-71. doi: 10.1111/pan.12462.
PMID: 24961960RESULTJagannathan N, Hajduk J, Sohn L, Huang A, Sawardekar A, Gebhardt ER, Johnson K, De Oliveira GS. A randomised comparison of the Ambu(R) AuraGain and the LMA(R) supreme in infants and children. Anaesthesia. 2016 Feb;71(2):205-12. doi: 10.1111/anae.13330. Epub 2015 Dec 9.
PMID: 26648173RESULTWhyte SD, Cooke E, Malherbe S. Usability and performance characteristics of the pediatric air-Q(R) intubating laryngeal airway. Can J Anaesth. 2013 Jun;60(6):557-63. doi: 10.1007/s12630-013-9918-6. Epub 2013 Mar 22.
PMID: 23519724RESULT
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rhendra Hardy Mohamad Zaini, MD
Universiti of Science Malaysia
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 2, 2017
First Posted
April 26, 2017
Study Start
November 1, 2016
Primary Completion
June 1, 2018
Study Completion
June 1, 2018
Last Updated
June 1, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share