A Comparison of the Ambu®AuraGain™ and the Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme™ in Normal Airway Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The study is designed to compare the performance of the Ambu AuraGain Laryngeal Mask Airway and LMA Supreme in normal airway patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2017
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 14, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 11, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 31, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 31, 2017
CompletedApril 12, 2017
April 1, 2017
10 months
March 14, 2017
April 11, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Oropharyngeal leak pressure
The airway pressure at which an airway leak is observed after successful placement of the device
Up to 1 minute after the time of confirmed device placement
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Insertion time
Up to 1 minute on each insertion attempt
Ease of insertion
Up to 1 minute on each insertion attempt
Fiberoptic Grade of Laryngeal View
Up to 1 minute after placement of device
Postoperative Complications
2 hours after removal of the device
Study Arms (2)
Ambu AuraGain
EXPERIMENTALSubjects will receive the Ambu AuraGain size 3 to size 5 based on manufacturer guidelines
LMA Supreme
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects will receive the LMA Supreme size 3 to size 5 based on manufacturer guidelines
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- American Society of Anesthesiologists Ⅰ-Ⅲ classification
- Patients evaluated as eligible for a LMA
- Body Mass Index ≤35kg/m2
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with known or predicted difficult airway
- Active respiratory infection
- Risk of aspiration
- Head and neck surgery
- Emergent surgery
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
ChineseAMS
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100144, China
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Liu Juhui, MD
Plastic Surgery Hospital, ChineseAMS
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Plastic Surgery Hospital
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 14, 2017
First Posted
April 11, 2017
Study Start
January 1, 2017
Primary Completion
October 31, 2017
Study Completion
October 31, 2017
Last Updated
April 12, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-04