The Effects of GMA-TULIP, I-gel, and BlockBuster Laryngeal Mask in Surgeries With Lateral Position Under General Anesthesia
1 other identifier
interventional
102
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To compare the efficacy and safety of traditional inflatable laryngeal mask, i-gel non-inflatable laryngeal mask and GMA-TULIP non-inflatable laryngeal mask in surgeries with lateral position under general anesthesia, so that providing evidence for the selection of laryngeal mask in surgeries with lateral position.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2024
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 21, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 5, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 20, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2026
January 20, 2025
July 1, 2024
1.8 years
January 5, 2025
January 14, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
oropharyngeal leak pressure
After the laryngeal mask is successful inserted, set the fresh gas flow to 3 L/min in manual mode, turn the APL valve to 30 cmH2O, then listen to the neck. When hearing the sound of air leakage, the peak airway pressure at this time is the oropharyngeal leak pressure.
1 minute after the laryngeal mask is successful inserted, 5 and 30 minutes after the lateral position
Secondary Outcomes (24)
The rate of first-insertion success
1 minute after the first-attempt insertion of the laryngeal mask
The rate of total-insertion success
1 minute after the airway is successfully controlled.
Time of insertion
1 minute after successful insertion of the laryngeal mask
Times of laryngeal mask adjustment before the successful insertion
1 minute after the airway is successfully controlled.
Success rate of gastric tube insertion through laryngeal mask
1 minute after the laryngeal mask is successful inserted
- +19 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
GMA-TULIP Laryngeal Mask Group(D1 Group)
EXPERIMENTALAfter the anesthesia induction, use the GMA-TULIP laryngeal mask as the airway ventilation device.
i-gel Laryngeal Mask Group(D2 Group)
ACTIVE COMPARATORAfter the anesthesia induction, use the i-gel laryngeal mask as an airway ventilation device.
BlockBuster Laryngeal Mask Group(D3 Group)
ACTIVE COMPARATORAfter the anesthesia induction is over, use the BlockBuster laryngeal mask as the airway ventilation device.
Interventions
After the anesthesia induction, use the GMA-TULIP laryngeal mask as the airway ventilation device.
After the anesthesia induction, use the i-gel laryngeal mask as an airway ventilation device.
After the anesthesia induction is over, use the BlockBuster laryngeal mask as the airway ventilation device.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients received surgeries in lateral position with an estimated surgery duration of less than 3 hours under general anesthesia.
- Ages between 18 to 80, and body mass index less than 28 kg/m².
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Grades I-III.
- Patients are willing to participate and be able to understand and sign an informed consent form.
You may not qualify if:
- Individuals with an open bite of less than 2cm.
- Individuals with a history of obvious regurgitation of gastric contents and risk factors for aspiration.
- Patients with combined pharyngeal and laryngeal lesions.
- Predicting difficult airway patients.
- Hearing, intellectual, communication, and cognitive impairments.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
Chongqing, Chongqing Municipality, 400000, China
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Bing Chen
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 5, 2025
First Posted
January 20, 2025
Study Start
August 21, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2026
Last Updated
January 20, 2025
Record last verified: 2024-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- The data will become available when publish and keep it for 5 years.
- Access Criteria
- Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal.
Individual participant data (IPD) will be available with the responding author when required.