Laparoscopic Pectopexy and Laparoscopic Colporrhaphies in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Treatment
1 other identifier
observational
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This prospective cohort study investigates the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic pectopexy and laparoscopic colporraphy performed at the Wellbeing Services County of South Ostrobothnia. The primary outcome measure is to assess changes in sensation of bulge and pressure. Secondary outcome measures include evaluating other prolapse symptoms and pain, quality of life, anatomical correction of prolapse, surgical safety parameters, and postoperative complications. Approximately 40-50 laparoscopic pectopexies will be performed over two years by a single experienced surgeon. The study requires preoperative and postoperative assessments, including standardized patient questionnaires and anatomical measurements.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Feb 2024
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 17, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 30, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 28, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 28, 2027
March 30, 2025
March 1, 2025
3.1 years
March 17, 2025
March 24, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Patient-reported postoperative sensation of bulging at 12 months postoperatively
During the history-taking process, symptoms such as a sensation of bulging or pressure are actively inquired about and documented accordingly. Results variables are presented as counts and percentages.
From the enrollment til follow-up visit at 12 months postoperatively
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Change in Pelvic Floor Organ function (PFDI-20 score)
From enrollment til the follow-up visit 12 months postoperatively
Change in sexual function and urinary incontinence (PISQ-12 score).
From the enrollment til follow-up visit at 12 months postoperatively
Change in quality of life. (15D questionnaire score)
From the enrollment til follow-up visit at 12 months postoperatively
Change in pelvic pain (VAS score)
From the enrollment til follow-up visit at 12 months postoperatively
Post voiding residual in ml.
From enrollment til the follow-up visit 12 months postoperatively
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Laparoscopic pectopexy with or without concomitant laparoscopic colporraphy
Patients undergoing laparoscopic pectopexy for pelvic organ prolapse, with or without concomitant laparoscopic anterior and posterior vaginal wall repair using sutures. The procedure involves the placement of a 3x15 cm Dynamesh PRP PVDF mesh to the vaginal apex or uterine cervical stump with monofilament and multifilament sutures and anchored to the pectineal ligaments bilaterally. Follow-up assessments will be conducted 12 months postoperatively to evaluate symptom relief, anatomical correction, and surgical safety.
Eligibility Criteria
Patients with symptomatic vaginal or uterine prolapse at least to the hymenal level and who have an indication for vaginal apex (DeLancey level I) prolapse repair using mesh are being recruited for the surgery.
You may qualify if:
- Symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse
- Uterine or vaginal vault prolapse reaching the hymenal ring (POP-Q classification: ≥0 cm)
- If uterus in situ, consent for supracervical hysterectomy
- Suitable for laparoscopic mesh surgery
- Age: 18-79 years
- Non-pregnant, no pregnancy desire.
- Sufficient Finnish language skills
- Concurrent anterior and/or posterior prolapse repair if POP-Q criteria met: tvl \>8 cm and Aa, Ba, Ap, Bp ≥0
You may not qualify if:
- Unwillingness to undergo surgery or mesh implantation
- High anesthetic or surgical risk due to comorbidities
- Indication for laparoscopic sacrocolporectopexy due to rectal intussusception
- Desire to preserve the uterus
- Pregnancy or planning future pregnancy
- Inability to understand Finnish or study-related forms due to cognitive impairments
- Need for concomitant urinary incontinence surgery
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Tampere University Hospitallead
- Seinajoki Central Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
The Wellbeing Services County of South Ostrobothnia
Seinäjoki, 60200, Finland
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Kirsi Kuismanen, MD, PhD
Tampere University
- STUDY CHAIR
Kari Nieminen, MD, PhD
Tampere University
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 17, 2025
First Posted
March 30, 2025
Study Start
February 1, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
February 28, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
February 28, 2027
Last Updated
March 30, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
In this study, it is not possible to share IPD, because of several issues: 1. Regulatory and Ethical Constraints: IPD will not be shared due to ethical considerations and data privacy regulations, including compliance with GDPR and other applicable laws protecting patient confidentiality. 2. Lack of Consent for Data Sharing: participants did not provide explicit consent for data sharing beyond the primary study objectives. 3. Institutional or Sponsor Policy: The study sponsor and institutional policies do not allow the sharing of individual participant data. 4. Confidentiality and Privacy Risks: Due to the sensitive nature of the collected data and the risk of re-identification, IPD will not be made publicly available. 5. No Plan for Secondary Use of Data: There are no current plans for sharing IPD as the study was not designed for secondary data use.