Traditional Vaginal Surgery VS Autologous Tissue in Pelvic Floor Repair
PREFAP
COMPARISON BETWEEN AUTOLOGOUS TISSUE RECONSTRUCTION USING vNOTES AND TRADITIONAL SURGERY IN TREATMENT OF PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE
1 other identifier
interventional
56
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this randomized, non blind, one center study is to compare the efficacy of vNOTES (vaginal natural orifice transluminal surgery) and traditional vaginal operation between the two groups by determining the risk of re-operation for anterior, posterior or apical prolapse within the study period. Participants with a POP-Q (Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification) of 3 or 4 and an indication for hysterectomy and prolapse repair will be selected and randomly divided in two groups. One group will be operated with standard technique for pelvic organ prolapse and in the other autologous graft will be used using vNOTES ICIQ-LUTSqol (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Quality of Life Module) and Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire IUGA revised (PISQ-IR) will be used as a subjective measurement of operative treatment. Objective evaluation of the effect of postoperative results will be done using transperineal ultrasound before operation, 6 and 12 months after procedure. EXPECTED CONTRIBUTION: In this research we will evaluate the feasibility and surgical outcome of vaginal NOTES (vNOTES) prolapse repair using posterior rectus fascia (PREFAP- Posterior Rectus Fascia Prolapse repair)
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 8, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 29, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 18, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 10, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 10, 2024
CompletedMay 9, 2023
May 1, 2023
6 months
November 8, 2022
May 7, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Traditional surgery vrs vNOTES PREFAP
Compare the efficacy of vNOTES autograft repair and traditional surgery between the two groups by determining the risk of reoperation for anterior, posterior or apical prolapse within the study period
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Complications
1 year
QoL
1 year
Subjective pelvic floor outcomes
1 year
Ultrasound measurement
1 year
Learning curve
1 year
Study Arms (2)
Traditional surgery
PLACEBO COMPARATORThis group of patients will be treated with standard technique (vaginal hysterectomy with anterior and/or posterior vaginal repair) for pelvic organ prolapse .
vNOTES PREFAP
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis group of patients will be treated with vNOTES aproach using autologous graft isolated from posterior rectus fascia for pelvic organ prolapse.
Interventions
Autologous tissue will be fixated on solid points in pelvis using vNOTES.
Vaginal hysterectomy will be done with anterior and/or posterior repair depending on the judgment of the surgeon at the time of the operation. Uterosacral and cardinal ligaments will be repositioned and attached to the vaginal vault after hysterectomy at the time of vault closure. A modified McCall culdoplasty will be done in this group to prevent enterocele and further apical prolapse
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients older than 18 years old with no desire to preserve fertility, POP-Q 3 or 4 stage of prolapse with indication for hysterectomy (abnormal uterine bleeding, enlarged fibrous uterus, premalignant cervical findings)
You may not qualify if:
- Virginity, pregnancy, acute urinary infection were considered contraindications; malignancy, previous PID or rectal surgery. Rectovaginal endometriosis. Contraindication for general anaesthesia, pneumoperitoneum or Trendelenburg position. Previous pelvic radiotherapy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Luka Matak MD
Zadar, 23000, Croatia
Related Publications (9)
Hokenstad ED, Glasgow AE, Habermann EB, Occhino JA. Readmission and Reoperation After Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2017 Mar/Apr;23(2):131-135. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000379.
PMID: 28067747RESULTGlazener CM, Breeman S, Elders A, Hemming C, Cooper KG, Freeman RM, Smith AR, Reid F, Hagen S, Montgomery I, Kilonzo M, Boyers D, McDonald A, McPherson G, MacLennan G, Norrie J; PROSPECT study group). Mesh, graft, or standard repair for women having primary transvaginal anterior or posterior compartment prolapse surgery: two parallel-group, multicentre, randomised, controlled trials (PROSPECT). Lancet. 2017 Jan 28;389(10067):381-392. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31596-3. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
PMID: 28010989RESULTSeth J, Toia B, Ecclestone H, Pakzad M, Hamid R, Greenwell T, Ockrim J. The autologous rectus fascia sheath sacrocolpopexy and sacrohysteropexy, a mesh free alternative in patients with recurrent uterine and vault prolapse: A contemporary series and literature review. Urol Ann. 2019 Apr-Jun;11(2):193-197. doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_85_18.
PMID: 31040607RESULTSharifiaghdas F. Autologous rectus fascia graft in the treatment of high-stage apical vaginal prolapse: preliminary results of a new surgical approach with native tissue. Int Urol Nephrol. 2022 May;54(5):1017-1022. doi: 10.1007/s11255-022-03167-8. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
PMID: 35286581RESULTGon LM, Riccetto CLZ, Coltro Neto F, Achermann APP, Pereira TA, Palma PCR. Sacrospinous hysteropexy with an autologous rectus fascia sling for treatment of advanced apical pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Aug;32(8):2291-2293. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04747-5. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
PMID: 33730231RESULTLee JC, Olaitan OK, Lopez-Soler R, Renz JF, Millis JM, Gottlieb LJ. Expanding the envelope: the posterior rectus sheath-liver vascular composite allotransplant. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Feb;131(2):209e-218e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182789c28.
PMID: 23358016RESULTAgarwal S, Dorafshar AH, Harland RC, Millis JM, Gottlieb LJ. Liver and vascularized posterior rectus sheath fascia composite tissue allotransplantation. Am J Transplant. 2010 Dec;10(12):2712-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03331.x.
PMID: 21114648RESULTRavindra KV, Martin AE, Vikraman DS, Brennan TV, Collins BH, Rege AS, Hollenbeck ST, Chinappa-Nagappa L, Eager K, Cousino D, Sudan DL. Use of vascularized posterior rectus sheath allograft in pediatric multivisceral transplantation--report of two cases. Am J Transplant. 2012 Aug;12(8):2242-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04088.x. Epub 2012 May 17.
PMID: 22594310RESULTBaekelandt JF, De Mulder PA, Le Roy I, Mathieu C, Laenen A, Enzlin P, Weyers S, Mol BWJ, Bosteels JJA. Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) adnexectomy for benign pathology compared with laparoscopic excision (NOTABLE): a protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 10;8(1):e018059. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018059.
PMID: 29326183RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- univ.mag spec Luka Matak M.D.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 8, 2022
First Posted
November 29, 2022
Study Start
March 18, 2023
Primary Completion
September 10, 2023
Study Completion
September 10, 2024
Last Updated
May 9, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
- Time Frame
- After the end of follow up period data will be available for one months
All data relevant to the research results will be published