Key Insights

Highlights

Success Rate

95% trial completion (above average)

Clinical Risk Assessment

Based on trial outcomes

Low Risk

Score: 27/100

Termination Rate

2.4%

1 terminated out of 41 trials

Success Rate

94.7%

+8.2% vs benchmark

Late-Stage Pipeline

15%

6 trials in Phase 3/4

Results Transparency

44%

8 of 18 completed with results

Key Signals

8 with results95% success

Data Visualizations

Phase Distribution

31Total
Not Applicable (24)
P 1 (1)
P 3 (1)
P 4 (5)

Trial Status

Completed18
Unknown14
Recruiting4
Active Not Recruiting2
Enrolling By Invitation1
Not Yet Recruiting1

Trial Success Rate

94.7%

Benchmark: 86.5%

Based on 18 completed trials

Clinical Trials (41)

Showing 20 of 20 trials
NCT07566949Not ApplicableNot Yet RecruitingPrimary

The Finnish Uterine Prolapse Surgery Trial (The Fin-UP Trial)

NCT05063331Not ApplicableActive Not RecruitingPrimary

Patient-Centered Outcomes in the Surgical Treatment of Uterovaginal Prolapse

NCT07120945Not ApplicableRecruiting

Hugo™ Robotic-Assisted Surgery (RAS) System in Gynecological Subjects (Embrace Gynecology)

NCT07295782RecruitingPrimary

The Assessment of Fibrin Clot Phenotype and Thrombin Generation in Women After Urogynecological Surgeries.

NCT07094815Completed

Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension With or Without Hysterectomy in Pelvic Organ Prolapse

NCT06024109Recruiting

Performance of SYMMCORA® vs. V-Loc® Suture Material in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Total Hysterectomy

NCT06902909Enrolling By Invitation

Laparoscopic Pectopexy and Laparoscopic Colporrhaphies in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Treatment

NCT06524700Not ApplicableActive Not RecruitingPrimary

Pectopexy Autologous Vs Mesh

NCT02431897Phase 4Completed

Investigation to Minimize Prolapse Recurrence of the Vagina Using Estrogen

NCT04038099Phase 4Completed

Lessons on Urethral Lidocaine in Urodynamics

NCT05586984Recruiting

Transvaginal Sacrospinous Hysteropexy Versus Laparoscopic Uterine Lateral Suspension

NCT00475540Not ApplicableCompleted

Efficacy Study of Vaginal Mesh for Prolapse

NCT01594372Not ApplicableTerminatedPrimary

Comparison of Laparoscopic to Vaginal Surgical Repair for Uterine Prolapse

NCT01097200Not ApplicableUnknown

Sacrocolpopexy Versus Vaginal Mesh Procedure for Pelvic Prolapse

NCT04637022Unknown

4K Versus 3D Laparoscopic Colporraphy by Surgeons in Training: a Prospective Randomized Trial

NCT00557882Phase 4Completed

Efficacy Study of Vaginal Mesh for Anterior Prolapse

NCT02680145Not ApplicableCompleted

Prediction of Postsurgical Symptomatic Outcomes With Preoperative Pessary Use

NCT02812186Phase 4Completed

Deep Versus Moderate Neuromuscular Blockade During Laparoscopic Surgery

NCT04209036Unknown

Can 3D Laparoscopy Improve Surgical Performances in Surgeons in Training?

NCT02888093Not ApplicableCompleted

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Permanent vs Absorbable Suture for Uterosacral Ligament Suspension

Scroll to load more

Research Network

Activity Timeline