The Finnish Uterine Prolapse Surgery Trial (The Fin-UP Trial)
Fin-UP
Manchester Procedure Versus Vaginal Hysterectomy for Women With Uterine Prolapse: A Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Study (The Fin-UP Trial)
1 other identifier
interventional
426
1 country
6
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the Manchester procedure and vaginal hysterectomy in treating patients with symptomatic uterine prolapse. The main question it aims to answer is:
- What is the difference in the success rates at the the two year follow-up Participants will:
- be randomized in either the Manchester procedure or vaginal hysterectomy group and operated as such
- visit the clinic at 2 and 5 years after the operation
- fill in questionnaires at 1, 2, 5 and 10 years after the operation
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2026
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
6 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 8, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 13, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 5, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2033
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2041
May 5, 2026
April 1, 2026
7.6 years
April 8, 2026
April 27, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Success at two year follow-up
Success is defined as a composite outcome including 1. the absence of POP beyond the hymen in any compartment (POP-Q Aa, Ap, Ba, Bp, C (and D for those in the MP group) all ≤ 0;), and 2. the absence of bulge symptoms defined as a negative response to the question, "Do you usually have a bulge or something falling out that you can see or feel in your vaginal area?" (PFDI-20 question 3 score 0), and 3. the absence of retreatment (surgery and/or pessary treatment for POP indication). Participants are classified as having achieved success if they meet all criteria.
Two year follow-up
Secondary Outcomes (19)
Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I)
1, 2, 5 and 10 year follow-up
Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS)
1, 2, 5 and 10 year follow-up
Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PFDI-20)
1, 2, 5 and 10 year follow-up
Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12)
1, 2, 5 and 10 year follow-up
Generic health related quality of life measured by EuroQol-5D-5L
1, 2, 5 and 10 year follow-up
- +14 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
The Manchester procedure
EXPERIMENTALVaginal Hysterectomy
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
The vaginal epithelium around the cervix is circumcised, and the bladder is dissected off the cervix. The posterior peritoneum is opened if considered technically feasible and clinically appropriate. The cardinal-uterosacral ligament complex is clamped, transected, and ligated. The ligament complex is sutured to the proximal part of the anterior cervix. The cervix is amputated using diathermy, and the patency of the cervical canal is ensured. The vaginal epithelium is sutured circumferentially around the remaining cervical stump. Concomitant anterior and posterior colporrhaphy as well as perineorrhaphy will be performed when deemed indicated by the surgeon.
The vaginal epithelium around the cervix is circumcised, and the bladder is dissected off the cervix. Both the anterior and posterior peritoneum are opened. The cardinal-uterosacral ligament complex is clamped, transected, and ligated. The uterus is removed in multiple steps by clamps and sutures. The adnexa are checked for abnormalities. Apical suspension is performed using a 0-polyglactin (braided, delayed-absorbable) suture. The suture incorporates the ligament complex on both sides and passes twice through the peritoneum and the full thickness of the posterior vaginal wall, exiting into the posterior fornix and returning through the same tissue layers. The suture is tightened to obliterate the cul-de-sac. In case of a large enterocele, an additional transverse suture may be placed proximally. The ligament pedicles are tied together in the midline. The vaginal wall is closed. Concomitant anterior and posterior colporrhaphy as well as perineorrhaphy will be performed when indicated.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Fit for elective vaginal surgery according to standard preoperative assessment
- Women aged over 18 years
- No previous POP surgery
- Symptomatic POP stage 2 or higher, with uterine descent of at least stage 2 (POP-Q point C ≥ minus 1) and with POP-Q point D ≤ minus 1. Patients with concurrent anterior or posterior compartment defects will be included.
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy or future plans of pregnancy
- Active malignancy of any kind
- Contraindication to vaginal hysterectomy (e.g. extensive intra-abdominal adhesions)
- Patient's preference for uterine removal or preservation
- Planned concomitant incontinence procedure
- Inability to speak Finnish or Swedish, understand the purpose of the study, or commit to follow-up
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Helsinki University Central Hospitalcollaborator
- Turku University Hospitalcollaborator
- Kuopio University Hospitalcollaborator
- Oulu University Hospitalcollaborator
- Central Finland Central Hospitalcollaborator
- Tampere University Hospitallead
Study Sites (6)
Helsinki University Hospital
Helsinki, Finland
Hospital Nova, The Wellbeing Services County of Central Finland
Jyväskylä, Finland
Kuopio University Hospital
Kuopio, Finland
Oulu University Hospital
Oulu, Finland
Tampere University Hospital
Tampere, Finland
Turku University Hospital
Turku, Finland
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- The treatment groups will be coded as Group A and Group B during the analysis phase. Researchers will analyze the data and reach a consensus on the interpretation of results before the treatment codes are disclosed.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 8, 2026
First Posted
May 5, 2026
Study Start
April 13, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2033
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2041
Last Updated
May 5, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04